Hunt vs Waters

[Will$i@c!]

Who should i take out waters or hunt
And then for who should i put them in for ???
i have 126k in the bank thusfar :) cheers

[Will$i@c!]

Keen for some advice PLEEEAAASSSEEEE ill pay you back

[starz]

very very tough decision depending on your team i would go hunt just because he will definatley make you money. where as waters has the ability to sky rocket with scores or 100 plus but also has the ability to crash and even decrease in value lol.

just depends on your teamn

[Will$i@c!]

my team looks like this
Backs: Enright, Hodge, Gilbert/Carrazzo, Shaw, Malceski, Hunt, Waters
Subs: Maguire, Silvagne
Midfield: Bartel, Pendlebury, Boak, Ball, Martin, Barlow
Subs: Banner, Bastinac
Rucks: Sandilands, Ottens
Subs: Warnock, Lobbe
Forwards:Riewoldt, Brown, Giansiracusa, Franklin, Gray, Warren, Dangerfield
Subs: Rockliff, Hitchcock

with $108,400 left in the kitty


Hey mate what do you think about the Gilbert/Carazzo situation it was origanally carazzo but then i changed my mind coz Fisher is injured which may mena gilbert gets more of the ball??? :)

[elephants]

i have both risky i know but i reckon it could pay off.

if you had to choose hunt will get you consistent 70-80 scores whilst waters will get you 50-100 scores up to you but if one is chose probly hunt on the consistency

can you have your say in the poll premo defenders would love to here your thoughts

[Will$i@c!]

alright mate
Elephants what do you think about gilbert/carazzo situation??

[Plastic Boy]

how can u say hunt will get consistent 70-80 scores when he's never averaged above 68.

Hunt will score 50-60 every week with an occasional 70

[chatters24]

As a bit of an alternative to both of these guys, Matt Sucking from the Hawks could also be another option if picked rd 1.