player dilemmas, help!

[bigadz]

hey guys, im having a few sleepless nights trying to decide on these players, who do you think are the ones most likey to a: play all year...b: be possible keepers and c: not make me want to throw things at the computer.

starting from the back line....

lockyer v walker v buckley v pratt.

all have scoring ability with each player being 20k less than the last, does anyone rate any of thee players for any particular reason? lock has the runs on the board, walker injury plagued, buckley playing in a poor team but can get mid field time and pratt scored well late last year.

grimes v hill v geary

one a first year player, the other 2 possibly not in the best 22, is it worth the risk on a first year player to save 40k?

suban v broughton

both seem like they will play at some stage, anyone have any prefs?

then in the middle....

selwood v pendlebury v knights.

again price differeces could matter, do we think they will ave about the same?

morton v masten.

huge one for me, i just cant decide between them, both 2nd year ,can be magnets, anyone have any thoughts?

and last one...

rielly v tuck v mackay

reckon tuck will play all year and is the best 22?..is the money difference between mackay and rielly worth it?

cheers for your help.

[love4thegame]

lockyer

Grimes, but they all will get alot of gametime.

Suban

Selwood, knights is also a solid performer

morton and masten, masten will save you $$$$

Rielly.