Round 3 Thread

Started by Jukes, April 04, 2017, 03:06:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kilbluff1985

Quote from: fanTCfool on April 09, 2017, 09:12:18 PM
Late VC change to the 'in-form' Higgins from Curnow was... well...
Would it possible for a full score breakdown given the margin was a singular point?

yeah i blame Lahug made me do Zerrett over Danger

Jukes

Quote from: fanTCfool on April 09, 2017, 09:12:18 PM
Late VC change to the 'in-form' Higgins from Curnow was... well...
Would it possible for a full score breakdown given the margin was a singular point?

Here's where my math and/or some wrong score gets exposed aha

Colorado Avalanche vs Quito Quetzals
D: Robbie Tarrant 76 // Zac Tuohy 66 // Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti 68 // Heath Grundy 53
M: Marc Murphy (C) 158x2 // Brad Ebert (VC) 107x1.5 // Tom Scully (DVC) 111 // Aaron Hall 95 // Ryan Griffen 39 //  Sam Gibson 66
R: Tom Hickey 112
F:  Isaac Smith 62 // Savage 59 // Mav Weller 65 // Levi Greenwood 74
U: Jared Polec 77 // Connor Blakely 69 // Harley Balic 38
add HGA: 38


Def: Callum Mills 83, Matthew Suckling 98, Ryan Burton (D/F) 80, Josh Smith 61
Mid: Ed Curnow (EVC) 117, Seb Ross (C) 99x2, David Swallow 117, Tom Phillips (M/F) 84, Hugh McCluggage (M/F) 43, Alex Neal-Bullen (M/F) 127
Ruck: Tom Campbell 45
Fwd: Shaun Higgins (VC) 58x1.5, Matthew Wright 49, Jeremy Cameron 112, Rich 118
Ut: Mitch McGovern (F) 50, Tom J Lynch (F) 94, Nick Haynes (D) 81

Note: Rich is in at F4 on Quito because he's the sub

kilbluff1985

WAIT WE STILL DO SUBS?

Jukes


Nige

#34
Carolina Panthers 20.7.127 defeated Anaheim Mighty Ducks 17.10.112
(Real: 1898 vs 1687)

Carolina were great and deserved to win this eight-point crunch match with the usually high-flying (for a duck, at least) Anaheim, who put up a pretty poor showing, but will be happy with Hannebery's return to form. The usual Dusty and Bont show prevailed for the Panthers, with great service in the ruck by Mumford and Grundy.

Best
Carolina: Martin, Bontempelli, Mumford, Docherty, Kelly, Kennedy, Grundy
Anaheim: Mundy, Dangerfield, Hannebery, Sandilands, Merrett


San Francisco Grizzlies 20.11.131 defeated New Brooklyn Hawks 16.13.109
(Real: 1971 vs 1628)

The Grizzlies finally got back on the winners list after three straight losses with a convincing win over the Hawks - and they will only get better with Coniglio, Pittard, Steven, and Deledio back in the side as a few guys they would replace had awful outings (Young 29, Swallow 52, and Wright 47). Liberatore tackled and handballed his way to a successful captaincy and the Hawks had a few good scores, but simply not enough to get the win in San Fran.

Best
San Francisco: Montagna, Goddard, Martin, Wines, Watts, Hawkins, Williams, Leuenberger, Viney
New Brooklyn: Liberatore, Sidebottom, Acres, Cripps


Boston Terriers 21.12.138 defeated Chicago Sharks 16.13.109
(Real: 2074 vs 1640)

As expected, Boston preserve their unbeaten run with a big win over the Sharks, who were let down massively by two of their starting midfielders combining for 52. It's a good side on paper and they will succeed once they gel - but when will that be?

Best
Boston: Riewoldt, Martin, Pendlebury, Dahlhaus, Selwood, Cotchin, Gibbs, Nankervis, Priddis
Chicago: Gaff, Hunt, Lynch, Oliver, Roughead


Reserves

North Carolina Tar Heels 8.5.53 defeated Birmingham Dragons 2.4.16
(Real: 534 vs 164)

Stanford Cardinal 3.8.26 lost to Harlem Naggers 10.9.69
(Real: 261 vs 692)

Suffolk Terriers 10.6.66 defeated Rockford Bears 9.6.60
(Real: 662 vs 598)

kilbluff1985

lol thought we got rid of the sub thing for some reason good to know

Jukes

I'll have the league and ressies ladders up tomorrow when I get home

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on April 09, 2017, 09:24:25 PM
lol thought we got rid of the sub thing for some reason good to know

At least it didn't cost you any wins like it potentially could have later on!

Koop

Quote from: Jukes on April 09, 2017, 09:16:56 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 09, 2017, 09:12:18 PM
Late VC change to the 'in-form' Higgins from Curnow was... well...
Would it possible for a full score breakdown given the margin was a singular point?

Here's where my math and/or some wrong score gets exposed aha

Colorado Avalanche vs Quito Quetzals
D: Robbie Tarrant 76 // Zac Tuohy 66 // Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti 68 // Heath Grundy 53
M: Marc Murphy (C) 158x2 // Brad Ebert (VC) 107x1.5 // Tom Scully (DVC) 111 // Aaron Hall 95 // Ryan Griffen 39 //  Sam Gibson 66
R: Tom Hickey 112
F:  Isaac Smith 62 // Savage 59 // Mav Weller 65 // Levi Greenwood 74
U: Jared Polec 77 // Connor Blakely 69 // Harley Balic 38
add HGA: 38


Def: Callum Mills 83, Matthew Suckling 98, Ryan Burton (D/F) 80, Josh Smith 61
Mid: Ed Curnow (EVC) 117, Seb Ross (C) 99x2, David Swallow 117, Tom Phillips (M/F) 84, Hugh McCluggage (M/F) 43, Alex Neal-Bullen (M/F) 127
Ruck: Tom Campbell 45
Fwd: Shaun Higgins (VC) 58x1.5, Matthew Wright 49, Jeremy Cameron 112, Rich 118
Ut: Mitch McGovern (F) 50, Tom J Lynch (F) 94, Nick Haynes (D) 81

Note: Rich is in at F4 on Quito because he's the sub

Quick questions on a couple of things Jukes. Don't understand the rules myself so just curious.

Do Savage & Rich in this situation (seeing as Rich slots into F4 as a Mid and Savage into F3 as a Def) get half points for OOP? I dont think they do currently.

My interpretation of the sub rule was it replaced the lowest scoring player on the respective line. Could be very wrong on that so forgive me if I am.

Whats the EMG rule for Americas SC? Does Varcoe as the FWD EMG come straight on for Elliott, does Savage slot in there as OOP, or does Balic move to the forwards and Savage slots onto the UTL bench?

kilbluff1985

sub has always gotten full points in any position

Koop

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on April 09, 2017, 09:41:10 PM
sub has always gotten full points in any position

oh look who's aware of the rules in a competition for once  :o

Also thats really OP ahaha

fanTCfool

So you can always name a premo midfielder as sub and have your worst position covered?

Nige

Quote from: fanTCfool on April 09, 2017, 10:09:19 PM
So you can always name a premo midfielder as sub and have your worst position covered?
Basically.

Jukes

Quote from: fanTCfool on April 09, 2017, 10:09:19 PM
So you can always name a premo midfielder as sub and have your worst position covered?

It's certainly one way to go about it, I just go with it as my 19th best player every week though.

powersuperkents

HOLY SHOWER!!!

I thought we had lost when Gawn went down - carn the Gold Coast  ;D

Jukes

#44
League Ladder
Boston Terriers   3   0   394   323   121.98
Carolina Panthers   3   0   374   336   111.31
Houston Bombers   2   1   372   346   107.51
Wisconsin Cockerels   2   1   350   334   104.79
Ottawa Otters   2   1   303   294   103.06
Anaheim Mighty Ducks   2   1   362   361   100.28
--------------------------------------------------------------------
San Francisco Grizzlies   1   2   364   374   97.33
Colorado Avalanche   1   2   317   332   95.48
Chicago Sharks   1   2   335   362   92.54
New Brooklyn Hawks   1   2   324   358   90.50
Quito Quetzals   0   3   300   321   93.46
Las Vegas Sinners   0   3   332   368   90.22

Reserves Ladder
Milwaukee Roosters   3   0   187   115   162.61
Nevada Desert Coyotes   3   0   187   151   123.84
North Carolina Tar Heels   2   1   160   115   139.13
Harlem Naggers   2   1   190   148   128.38
Montreal Moose   2   1   127   131   96.95
Stanford Cardinal   2   1   158   166   95.18
------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio Grande Valley Rockets   1   2   196   162   120.99
Colorado Bootleggers   1   2   148   154   96.10
Suffolk Terriers   1   2   156   177   88.14
Galápagos Tortoise   1   2   125   160   78.13
Rockford Bears   0   3   146   188   77.66
Birmingham Dragons   0   3   90   170   52.94