Round 2 - Geelong v North Melbourne - Sunday 2nd April - Etihad

[miamis_finest]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

[AaronKirk]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

He did take a contested mark inside 50 which attracts more points, hence why he went up at that point in time.

[_wato]

GHS making it really easy for me to trade him to WHE

Get involved FFS!!

Hopeless at this stage. Always gives frees against instead of getting his own points ffs

He was the 30th player picked in my team, so kind of in their by default and circumstance so I won't be giving it a second thought - out as soon as lockout is over

haha he sat on the bench for 18 minutes that quarter. ridiculous

[Mat0369]

Horlin-Smith

[miamis_finest]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

He did take a contested mark inside 50 which attracts more points, hence why he went up at that point in time.

For enough but 30 points for 8 disposals at 50% with atleast one clangers, and no tackles is strange.

[RaisyDaisy]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

He did take a contested mark inside 50 which attracts more points, hence why he went up at that point in time.

For enough but 30 points for 8 disposals at 50% with atleast one clangers, and no tackles is strange.

I don't see any problem with 29SC for 8 possessions, 5 of them contested

[miamis_finest]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

He did take a contested mark inside 50 which attracts more points, hence why he went up at that point in time.

For enough but 30 points for 8 disposals at 50% with atleast one clangers, and no tackles is strange.

I don't see any problem with 29SC for 8 possessions, 5 of them contested

Not worrying about efficiency now? Alright.

[Gigantor]

Wonder if Goldy would have played if Preuss wasn't an option

[RaisyDaisy]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

He did take a contested mark inside 50 which attracts more points, hence why he went up at that point in time.

For enough but 30 points for 8 disposals at 50% with atleast one clangers, and no tackles is strange.

I don't see any problem with 29SC for 8 possessions, 5 of them contested

Not worrying about efficiency now? Alright.

I think you need to read the rules about how and what scores in SC

[GoLions]

I have to laugh at supercoach, all the things you guys spew about Treloar doesn't effect Dangerfield. I watched his score after a direct turnover, he didn't lose any points, and then I'm watching his score go up by 1's every now and then for not going near the pill or tackles.  In fact I just watch him get an uncontested possession and kick it out of bounds into the 50 missing a target, and went up by 5 points.

He just kicked a behind, so he will probably go up 5-10 points.

Yup, for kicking a point he just went from 23 points to 30.

He did take a contested mark inside 50 which attracts more points, hence why he went up at that point in time.

For enough but 30 points for 8 disposals at 50% with atleast one clangers, and no tackles is strange.

I don't see any problem with 29SC for 8 possessions, 5 of them contested

Not worrying about efficiency now? Alright.

As long as it's not a clanger, an ineffective contested possession will still get you a few points. An uncontested ineffective possession will get you flower all.

I think you need to read the rules about how and what scores in SC

^

[miamis_finest]

Dangerfield at less than 40% now on 13 touches for 40 points. Yes mate I understand how supercoach works, I also understand that dependng on what you're name is you get more points for doing certain things. That's been evident in Ablett and Dangerfield's career, and I've had them plenty of times.

[Gigantor]

Slow clap for Marley haha

[RaisyDaisy]

LOL Pruess

That's just reckless

[Woppa15]

So who of us just traded in Pruess only to miss next week lol

[Mat0369]

I wish Thurlow wasn't an emergency round 1 and actually named.