Adam Treloar

[MontyJnr]

Owner of both Adams & Treloar and surprised they scored as well as they did. They couldn't hit the broad side of a barn tonight.

And people suggesting that Treloar will pass Pendlebury in 2017 is laughable. Pendlebury an absolute class above. Superstar. Taking his VC score all the way to the bank :)

[Dudge]

96 for Treloar

96 still seems low.

I know he had 5 clangers but still.

Was thinking he would at least get 105-110 SC.

On a brighter note I am wrapped with my Hoskin Elliot selection at F5 and wacking the VC on Pendles.  ;D

And happy with Adams but everyone has him....  :-X

Not me, some of us are stupid :(

Yeah that's me

We have this discussion every year has to SC scoring and each year we come back and still complain so something must be OK to bring us back or we would not.
For the newer ones SC has a points allocation from CD of 3300 points per game so very subjectively they say they review scores after full time and make adjustments accordingly to get the 3300 points. So the scaling is the issue we have each year.
Will keep coming back and keep cursing CD over some scores part of the fun of the game.


Mod Editing a Mod: 3300 Ringo, not 3200 ;)

For me Ringo, it's only because of Elxam overall, otherwise i wouldn't play SC

[Grazz]

I've only ever played SC, never DT. Seems DT is a fairer reflection on the impact on games?

You'd probably have a lot of SC guru's suggest it's the opposite
which I tend to agree with to a point.  ;)

[Gigantor]

I've only ever played SC, never DT. Seems DT is a fairer reflection on the impact on games?

Not really, in DT you get points even if you kick straight to the opposition

[Ringo]

I've only ever played SC, never DT. Seems DT is a fairer reflection on the impact on games?

Not really, in DT you get points even if you kick straight to the opposition

Yep each of the comps has their own little quirks which makes playing all 3 very interesting.

[Dudge]

I've only ever played SC, never DT. Seems DT is a fairer reflection on the impact on games?

Not really, in DT you get points even if you kick straight to the opposition

Yeah, but it's not someones interpretation sitting at CD. You have to admit, some scores are plain ridiculous. Plus the rolling lockout, when people work during games. At least in the other formats, you get what you actually get, good or bad

[Grazz]

We're not going to rehash the same old same old for the 10th year running are we.
It is what it is and we love it still.  ??? ( do feel for those who work though )

[tkringle]

I've only ever played SC, never DT. Seems DT is a fairer reflection on the impact on games?

You'd probably have a lot of SC guru's suggest it's the opposite
which I tend to agree with to a point.  ;)

[Dudge]

We're not going to rehash the same old same old for the 10th year running are we.
It is what it is and we love it still.  ??? ( do feel for those who work though )

Easy bigfella lol

[Grazz]

We're not going to rehash the same old same old for the 10th year running are we.
It is what it is and we love it still.  ??? ( do feel for those who work though )

Easy bigfella lol

I mentioned those that work fossil.  ;)

[Dudge]

We're not going to rehash the same old same old for the 10th year running are we.
It is what it is and we love it still.  ??? ( do feel for those who work though )

Easy bigfella lol

I mentioned those that work fossil.  ;)

Unfair enough i suppose

[GoLions]

Treloar didn't have a big impact on the game after quarter time. Too much uncontested ball and butchers it every now and then as well.

Locked in DT and AF, Pendles soooo much better in SC

[Judd Magic]

Treloar didn't have a big impact on the game after quarter time. Too much uncontested ball and butchers it every now and then as well.

Locked in DT and AF, Pendles soooo much better in SC

I don't know if I should trade out Treloar if he goes under 100 again next week.

Didn't really realise that he is more DT than SC as I have never had him before.

Maybe a round 2 correctional trade to JPK, Rockcliff, Bont if another Treloar sub 100 performance....  :-\

[GoLions]

Treloar didn't have a big impact on the game after quarter time. Too much uncontested ball and butchers it every now and then as well.

Locked in DT and AF, Pendles soooo much better in SC

I don't know if I should trade out Treloar if he goes under 100 again next week.

Didn't really realise that he is more DT than SC as I have never had him before.

Maybe a round 2 correctional trade to JPK, Rockcliff, Bont if another Treloar sub 100 performance....  :-\

He's still a decent pick, will be a top 15 mid i reckon. But i don't really get why some people dropped Pendles for him and are shocked at his score tonight. It was a 110-115 game at best, but with so many DT points scored, SC scores were going to be comparatively lower, so 96 is pretty close to the mark for him tonight.

[Judd Magic]

Treloar didn't have a big impact on the game after quarter time. Too much uncontested ball and butchers it every now and then as well.

Locked in DT and AF, Pendles soooo much better in SC

I don't know if I should trade out Treloar if he goes under 100 again next week.

Didn't really realise that he is more DT than SC as I have never had him before.

Maybe a round 2 correctional trade to JPK, Rockcliff, Bont if another Treloar sub 100 performance....  :-\

He's still a decent pick, will be a top 15 mid i reckon. But i don't really get why some people dropped Pendles for him and are shocked at his score tonight. It was a 110-115 game at best, but with so many DT points scored, SC scores were going to be comparatively lower, so 96 is pretty close to the mark for him tonight.

I have Pendles too and put the VC on him. Hah!

Treloar was one of my last mid spots.

Just had no idea who to put there out of him, Rocky, JPK, Bont.

Current midfield is Danger, Pendles, Fyfe, Beams, Tich, Treloar, O'Meara, Petrevski Seton (Powell-Pepper, Barrett, Parfitt)