Round 1 progressive scores

[Millsy999]

2236. Happy with that for the opening round.

[LaHug]

Can't be upset with 2225. Only really disappointed in Taranto and not being home to trade out Swallow before it was too late.

[crowls]

2180,   difficult weekend.   Cheap rookies sucked,  Macmillan failed.  stuffed C allocation as well.     Take a couple of days and decide if I want to wait a week for corrective trades or not.   I start SC as well as Webber starts a grand prix.

[Money Shot]

2267 which I am quite happy with.

Pretty happy with all my selections but the rookies are looking shower this year.

[HappyDEZ]

Can't be upset with 2225. Only really disappointed in Taranto and not being home to trade out Swallow before it was too late.

Same boat LaHug except I deliberately left Swallow in. Still hoping it turns out for the better in the long run. I mean $280 for a guy that should go 85-95 is great value if he can just get on the deck.

[LaHug]

Can't be upset with 2225. Only really disappointed in Taranto and not being home to trade out Swallow before it was too late.

Same boat LaHug except I deliberately left Swallow in. Still hoping it turns out for the better in the long run. I mean $280 for a guy that should go 85-95 is great value if he can just get on the deck.

Yeah, that's a pretty good point. Just gotta hop he plays this week.

[LordSneeze]

Can't be upset with 2225. Only really disappointed in Taranto and not being home to trade out Swallow before it was too late.

Same boat LaHug except I deliberately left Swallow in. Still hoping it turns out for the better in the long run. I mean $280 for a guy that should go 85-95 is great value if he can just get on the deck.

Problem here is he is still in 38% of sides. Great value if he can hit that, but the injury justified to me not taking that risk over WHE

[HappyDEZ]

Can't be upset with 2225. Only really disappointed in Taranto and not being home to trade out Swallow before it was too late.

Same boat LaHug except I deliberately left Swallow in. Still hoping it turns out for the better in the long run. I mean $280 for a guy that should go 85-95 is great value if he can just get on the deck.

Problem here is he is still in 38% of sides. Great value if he can hit that, but the injury justified to me not taking that risk over WHE

85-95 might be a bit optimistic I suppose Lord but even 75-85 will do if he can just play a game. If he is not named this week he will be tough to hold.

[OdisCrows]

2307 rank #1627

[GoLions]

2231 for me. Premos were mostly really good, and rookies were really bad :p

[js19]

An interesting note - the top rd 1 team doesn't have Danger, and used the money well elsewhere.

Vc on Dusty, but no loop so got Fyfes C score

[piesfan1989]

An interesting note - the top rd 1 team doesn't have Danger, and used the money well elsewhere.

Vc on Dusty, but no loop so got Fyfes C score

That is interesting...I guess the argument I'd have against that he doesn't have a perma captain option, whereas danger offers that.

The guy coming first had pretty much the perfect rd 1 team with JJK + butler + mcgrath starting (not to mention his mid-pricers in tuohy & mills putting in respectable scores). If I compare him to my team and swap out buddy for JJK and otten/taranto for mcgrath/butler (+ a small buffer for my mid-pricer not working), our scores would be within ~15 points of each other.

Whether or not omitting dangerfield has strongly contributed to that, I'm not entirely sure.

Good observation, though.

[Rusty00]

An interesting note - the top rd 1 team doesn't have Danger, and used the money well elsewhere.

Vc on Dusty, but no loop so got Fyfes C score

Yeah I noticed that. No Danger or Pendles.

[Hagebear]

Somehow managed 2,378. Ranked 159 after round 1. Can't complain with that.

[HappyDEZ]

Somehow managed 2,378. Ranked 159 after round 1. Can't complain with that.

Nice one.