Is Marchbank a must?

[Torpedo10]

Scores seem flowered

71 to 97 scaling and Nank going backwards 10 is just wrong

And Dochers going back 7?

He wasn't seen in the last quarter but the game was dead by then.

[Cookie Monster]

Scores seem flowered

71 to 97 scaling and Nank going backwards 10 is just wrong

It is, it's fkn ridiculous.

But i'm not complaining.

[tommy10]

SC has him on 97 atm  :o

Would be insane if that was true!

It is...so far. With what's happened with the site at sc wouldn't be surprised if it was scaled down

[BratPack]

Nor am I if true. GIMME GIMME GIMME

[King_Robbo]

Scores seem flowered

71 to 97 scaling and Nank going backwards 10 is just wrong

Nuh they have butchered the scoring- Docherty was on 88 at 3/4 time and I'd only on 91.. They'll fix it in a tick

[RaisyDaisy]

Scores have gone from orange to green in SC indicating their finalised

Most ridiculous scaling I've seen

[PowerBug]

I think those are the final scores lads. Scaling looks to have happened and scores added to the SC site :) 97 for Marchbank!!!

[RaisyDaisy]

I've got Marchbank so I should be happy with the biggest scale up to ever happen in SC history lol but I'm filthy that Nank and Dochers lost so much!

[GoLions]

Scores have gone from orange to green in SC indicating their finalised

Most ridiculous scaling I've seen

I don't think it was scaling, I think the scores were just flowered all night and now they're fixed.

[Goosey]

Scores have gone from orange to green in SC indicating their finalised

Most ridiculous scaling I've seen

I don't think it was scaling, I think the scores were just flowered all night and now they're fixed.

And fixed well  ;D

[Bully]

I've got Marchbank so I should be happy with the biggest scale up to ever happen in SC history lol but I'm filthy that Nank and Dochers lost so much!

It all balances out in the end.

[Cookie Monster]

I've got Marchbank so I should be happy with the biggest scale up to ever happen in SC history lol but I'm filthy that Nank and Dochers lost so much!

Okay.


Nank 123 and Marchbank 71

or Nank 114 and Marchbank 97

No sure on Docherty's scaling but I don't think he lost 15.

[hawkers65]

Marchbank finished on 71 - scaled up to 97
Prestia finished on 98 - scaled up to 115
Dusty finished on 144 - scaled up to 159
Marc Murphy finished on 123 - scaled up to 138
Nankervis scaled from 123 down to 114
Dochertty scaled from 97 down to 91

[TyphnnP16]

more ridiculous is how Rance scored 59....with 9 disposals @ 88%, 4 marks, 4 tackles, 3 FA & 4 clangers...


SC loves him...


I don't think SC knows how to score in there own system...  but happy Marchbank gained 26 points!!!!

[GoLions]

more ridiculous is how Rance scored 59....with 9 disposals @ 88%, 4 marks, 4 tackles, 3 FA & 4 clangers...


SC loves him...


I don't think SC knows how to score in there own system...  but happy Marchbank gained 26 points!!!!

4 marks and 4 tackles will give you around 25 points, give or take (depending on contested vs uncontested, where abouts on the ground, etc). 7 kicks and 2 handballs at 88%, of which 5 were contested, is going to get you around 40 points. 3 frees against and the 1 clanger possession loses you about 16. And he had quite a few 1%ers which don't show in the regular stats sheet. 59 basically bang on imo.