Is Marchbank a must?

[King_Robbo]

Marchbank finished on 71 - scaled up to 97
Prestia finished on 98 - scaled up to 115
Dusty finished on 144 - scaled up to 159
Marc Murphy finished on 123 - scaled up to 138
Nankervis scaled from 123 down to 114
Dochertty scaled from 97 down to 91

The most bizare scaling and SC scoring I've ever seen...
Dochery was on 41 at half time (DT 50) as he was butchering the ball a bit..
88 at 3qtr time after he blizted the 3rd term with (from memory) 8-9 touches and some very damaging long kicks
then he picked up only a few disposals when the game was well and truly done, went up to 97 then somehow got scaled back to 91?! Craziness..
Marchbank played well but 97 is laughable! I do have him so I'm happy but it is ridiculous to think that he had more of an impact on that game than Docherty and others..
@ Champion data - pull your finger out!

[Bully]

As far as Marchbank goes I'm just looking at the cash situation, Doch was a little disappointing but he's still in good form, that's the main thing.

[Mat0369]

Marchbank had a lot of intercept possessions which is what gave him the big SC. He butchered it as the game went on but the instruction looked to be to take risks.

Doc barely touched it in the last which is why I think he was scaled down.

[Grufflez]

Yeah, Marchbanks marking and getting to the right places was great, his disposal was a bit sloppy at times, looked like a laid a tackle or two also.

I'll watch next week but unless he looks like maintaining a 90+ averaging i won't be moving structure to get him in.

[Samm79]

13 of his 19 possessions were intercept possessions, 10 contested, 3 marks of which may be you could argue we're contested and intercept = SuperCoach gold!

[MontyJnr]

Marchbank finished on 71 - scaled up to 97
Prestia finished on 98 - scaled up to 115
Dusty finished on 144 - scaled up to 159
Marc Murphy finished on 123 - scaled up to 138
Nankervis scaled from 123 down to 114
Dochertty scaled from 97 down to 91

The most bizare scaling and SC scoring I've ever seen...
Dochery was on 41 at half time (DT 50) as he was butchering the ball a bit..
88 at 3qtr time after he blizted the 3rd term with (from memory) 8-9 touches and some very damaging long kicks
then he picked up only a few disposals when the game was well and truly done, went up to 97 then somehow got scaled back to 91?! Craziness..
Marchbank played well but 97 is laughable! I do have him so I'm happy but it is ridiculous to think that he had more of an impact on that game than Docherty and others..
@ Champion data - pull your finger out!

My understanding is they stuffed up the scoring mid game with most of main AFL sites crashing (so Docherty's 88 at 3QT was incorrect, for instance) and they adjusted the scores correctly at the end.

[GoLions]

Scores have gone from orange to green in SC indicating their finalised

Most ridiculous scaling I've seen

I don't think it was scaling, I think the scores were just flowered all night and now they're fixed.

Marchbank finished on 71 - scaled up to 97
Prestia finished on 98 - scaled up to 115
Dusty finished on 144 - scaled up to 159
Marc Murphy finished on 123 - scaled up to 138
Nankervis scaled from 123 down to 114
Dochertty scaled from 97 down to 91

The most bizare scaling and SC scoring I've ever seen...
Dochery was on 41 at half time (DT 50) as he was butchering the ball a bit..
88 at 3qtr time after he blizted the 3rd term with (from memory) 8-9 touches and some very damaging long kicks
then he picked up only a few disposals when the game was well and truly done, went up to 97 then somehow got scaled back to 91?! Craziness..
Marchbank played well but 97 is laughable! I do have him so I'm happy but it is ridiculous to think that he had more of an impact on that game than Docherty and others..
@ Champion data - pull your finger out!

My understanding is they stuffed up the scoring mid game with most of main AFL sites crashing (so Docherty's 88 at 3QT was incorrect, for instance) and they adjusted the scores correctly at the end.

Thank you.

[juzztheball]

So the question remains for us non-Marchbank owners... if he scores well again next week do we need to squeeze him in? What does he need to score next week to be a 'lock'?

[Ringo]

Marchbank finished on 71 - scaled up to 97
Prestia finished on 98 - scaled up to 115
Dusty finished on 144 - scaled up to 159
Marc Murphy finished on 123 - scaled up to 138
Nankervis scaled from 123 down to 114
Dochertty scaled from 97 down to 91

The most bizare scaling and SC scoring I've ever seen...
Dochery was on 41 at half time (DT 50) as he was butchering the ball a bit..
88 at 3qtr time after he blizted the 3rd term with (from memory) 8-9 touches and some very damaging long kicks
then he picked up only a few disposals when the game was well and truly done, went up to 97 then somehow got scaled back to 91?! Craziness..
Marchbank played well but 97 is laughable! I do have him so I'm happy but it is ridiculous to think that he had more of an impact on that game than Docherty and others..
@ Champion data - pull your finger out!

My understanding is they stuffed up the scoring mid game with most of main AFL sites crashing (so Docherty's 88 at 3QT was incorrect, for instance) and they adjusted the scores correctly at the end.

Was watching closely last night and all the Data seemed to freeze at the 20 minute mark of second quarter and did not come back correctly till a fair way into 3rd quarter.   So with all that trouble and adjustments to make would not read too much into the change.
The usual teething problems with live scoring for Rd 1.  Trust all has been sorted for the weekend

[StuL]

He's must have now but if you didn't start him well too bad. I wouldn't bother getting him in. 

[Grazz]

He's must have now but if you didn't start him well too bad. I wouldn't bother getting him in.

A corrective trade early to get him in isn't an issue if you want him/need him.
I wouldn't be flowering up a team structure to do it but if it's possible with a
trade then go for it prior to round 3 price rises.

[LordSneeze]

If you didn't start no point bringing him in.

Most people expect an 80 average. The way I work a correction trade is that you need to make a combined 300k from the option. Each trade is worth 150k. I cannot see this being worth 2 trades.

[ronl]

He did more than enough last night, now that he's got his feet wet no doubt he'll go on with it.

[Grazz]

If you didn't start no point bringing him in.

Most people expect an 80 average. The way I work a correction trade is that you need to make a combined 300k from the option. Each trade is worth 150k. I cannot see this being worth 2 trades.

Definitely not worth doing if it takes 2 trades agree.

[Ringo]

But worth it if doing a single corrective trade - Say you have cash eft over and EVW still has not played so I would class that as corrective and not a waste of trade as you are bringing in a player who is about to go up in price for a player who is not playing. That is my view on corrective trades and may differ from others.