British XV Round 1 Lodgement and Banter

[GoLions]

Hang on, UF decided to reverse the order of some teams and so just gotta fix up some HGA stuff >:(

Ok, scores have been updated. Might have to go through the fixture in UF again tonight or tomorrow. Hasn't changed any results, just put the Breakers above the Steins and that's about it. Sorry everyone! :)

I am checking now Rd 2 is now correct, had to adjust 3,  and will go through others as well. Not sure what is happening with UF maybe some technical issues.

Yeah i already fixed rd2 earlier.

[Ringo]

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

[GoLions]

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

Yep, so the Hedgies had Hutchings score 90, but he was OOP in defence so only 45. So using that as HGA as it is the lowest on their field.

[SydneyRox]

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

Yep, so the Hedgies had Hutchings score 90, but he was OOP in defence so only 45. So using that as HGA as it is the lowest on their field.

I think that is a bit rough. If someone is playing an OPP, they are already behind and the OPP would pretty often be the lowest score

[kilbluff1985]

us not being #1 is rigged

[Rusty00]

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

Yep, so the Hedgies had Hutchings score 90, but he was OOP in defence so only 45. So using that as HGA as it is the lowest on their field.

I think that is a bit rough. If someone is playing an OPP, they are already behind and the OPP would pretty often be the lowest score

Kind of agree, as then they are virtually being punished twice. I'm happy to go with whatever though.

[Ringo]

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

Yep, so the Hedgies had Hutchings score 90, but he was OOP in defence so only 45. So using that as HGA as it is the lowest on their field.

OK now I have it right I am going to suggest that we just go with lowest scoring player on field before adjustment. My reasoning team are already being penalised by playing a player OOP and this would be further punishment unnecessary in my opinion.So happy to not use OOP but will go with majority,  As I played Hedgies happy for them to take lowest score, 

[GoLions]

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

Yep, so the Hedgies had Hutchings score 90, but he was OOP in defence so only 45. So using that as HGA as it is the lowest on their field.

I think that is a bit rough. If someone is playing an OPP, they are already behind and the OPP would pretty often be the lowest score

Kind of agree, as then they are virtually being punished twice. I'm happy to go with whatever though.

So correct me if I am not getting what you are saying but I think I have it.

Player x scores 75 and is lowest scoring player on field, Player Y scores 100 but score halved to 50 so 50 would be the HGA not 75.

Yep, so the Hedgies had Hutchings score 90, but he was OOP in defence so only 45. So using that as HGA as it is the lowest on their field.

OK now I have it right I am going to suggest that we just go with lowest scoring player on field before adjustment. My reasoning team are already being penalised by playing a player OOP and this would be further punishment unnecessary in my opinion.So happy to not use OOP but will go with majority,  As I played Hedgies happy for them to take lowest score, 

Yeah that's fair enough, I wasn't really set on the first option but figured I'd go lowest for now and then see what people think. As long as there are no objections, happy to go with lowest before OOP adjustments are made :)

[GoLions]

Ok, here are all HGA and score adjustments, let me know if I got anything wrong here :)

Rams: +82 HGA
Leeches: +53 HGA Bunnies: +73 HGA
Breakers: +41 HGA
Hedgies: +45 Hutchings OOP to replace McVeigh, +77 HGA
Hoods: +99 Cameron OOP to replace Giles, +73 HGA
Magic: +56 HGA
Badgers: +100 HGA
Steins: +76 HGA
Giants: -35 Haynes comes on field instead of SPP, +53 HGA
Hurricanes: +66 HGA Knights: +54 HGA



Slightly unrelated, but don't think we've had this issue (almost came up this week): If your OOP scorer is your lowest after being halved, should that be your HGA? Almost happened to the Hoods.

Final adjustments

[GoLions]

Oops, missed Owls +91 for Robbo covering Thompson, which makes them the highest scorers of the week, and puts them in the top 4 as well

[iZander]

us not being #1 is rigged

Oops, missed Owls +91 for Robbo covering Thompson, which makes them the highest scorers of the week, and puts them in the top 4 as well

How so Kb?

[Vinny]

Oops, missed Owls +91 for Robbo covering Thompson, which makes them the highest scorers of the week, and puts them in the top 4 as well

We're going back2back. Mark my words.

Sorry KB ;)

[Nige]

Would have drawn with the Leeches and beaten like 8 other teams  :o :(

Oh well, time to take down the Badgers next week.

[kilbluff1985]

us not being #1 is rigged

Oops, missed Owls +91 for Robbo covering Thompson, which makes them the highest scorers of the week, and puts them in the top 4 as well

How so Kb?

highest points  :P

[kilbluff1985]

like i know it's done by % and i'm talking shower