Jake Lloyd

[tommy10]

SC is a game full of luck. Oh well at least my opp had him in my main league and I wouldn't need to waste a trade for him. The byes could not have come at a perfect time for him. Will be ripe and ready to go from round 12.

[King_Robbo]

SC is a game full of luck. Oh well at least my opp had him in my main league and I wouldn't need to waste a trade for him. The byes could not have come at a perfect time for him. Will be ripe and ready to go from round 12.

Waste a trade? Lols.. On a bloke that is going to average 95-100 and he'll be $400k. Nope, not a waste in my book....

[GoLions]

When would it have been that the last time a player scored a zero in supercoach?  :o

I can remember 2 or 3 negative scores from years ago like Mcleod and Taylor Walker.

-12 for Mcleod i believe it was. I don't easily forget my players dishing up those scores... :'(

[Ingram]

Should hit his lowest after rnd 13 but still should be around 450k

Rnd 13 Shaw to Lloyd locked in at this stage.

[Judd Magic]

Should hit his lowest after rnd 13 but still should be around 450k

Rnd 13 Shaw to Lloyd locked in at this stage.

Think I'll be doing this too.

Shaws done as a premo IMO.

[Hawka]

Should hit his lowest after rnd 13 but still should be around 450k

Rnd 13 Shaw to Lloyd locked in at this stage.

Think I'll be doing this too.

Shaws done as a premo IMO.

I am not gving up on SHaw just yet

[Judd Magic]

Should hit his lowest after rnd 13 but still should be around 450k

Rnd 13 Shaw to Lloyd locked in at this stage.

Think I'll be doing this too.

Shaws done as a premo IMO.

I am not gving up on SHaw just yet

Either am I.

He has till round 14 when Lloyd bottoms out to change my mind.....

[enzedder]

No way am I trading Heath Shaw.
I cannot and will not entertain the thought of it.
We're all disappointed in him to date this year but he's still averaging 87.
Have a look at his past record and you'll see he can start slowly and he can have a run of low scores.
He's been arguably the top defender for years. 100+ scores will be coming. Don't forget he scored 203 in a game last year either. Talk of him being finished is OTT.
Any move to another premo like Lloyd is classic sideways and a waste.
By all means bring in Lloyd when he's bottomed out but if you started Shaw he's a keeper.
Post byes Shaw and Lloyd will the main targets of lots of good teams to complete their defence.

[Thewizz71]

Had him from the start  :).
Plus side for me, at least my opponents have him as well ???

[miamis_finest]

Current backline
Docherty, Laird, Adams, Hibberd, Shaw, Newman....... Lloyd is going to look very nice.

[Bully]

Will get him for sure, might put Hibberd on ice and pick him up for 400k.

[tommy10]

Current backline
Docherty, Laird, Adams, Hibberd, Shaw, Newman....... Lloyd is going to look very nice.

Very nice backline

[Bully]

Stewart to Lloyd in round 14 won't cost too much, maybe 70-80k. Think I will get Roberton with my next upgrade and finish with Lloyd. Scharenberg likely to be back-up.

[upthemaidens]

I didn't think playing 0s counted?? Unless it's been changed in recent years?

There was a time that getting zero didn't count.  I think it may of had to do with the computer program in place, because a negative score did count.
  Almost like the program would see a zero and not count it.  Sees a negative score and does count it, since that player must of played.

I did write to them saying that once a player starts the game they should count, no matter of their score.
    Their response was a Zero player hasn't influenced the game(which is incorrect), while a negative player has.
... Anyhow the rule was changed in the following season.  I'm happy to take some credit for the change.  :)

[King_Robbo]

I didn't think playing 0s counted?? Unless it's been changed in recent years?

There was a time that getting zero didn't count.  I think it may of had to do with the computer program in place, because a negative score did count.
  Almost like the program would see a zero and not count it.  Sees a negative score and does count it, since that player must of played.

I did write to them saying that once a player starts the game they should count, no matter of their score.
    Their response was a Zero player hasn't influenced the game(which is incorrect), while a negative player has.
... Anyhow the rule was changed in the following season.  I'm happy to take some credit for the change.  :)

Haha that's hilarious! A zero player not affecting the game but a minus does?!?! God CD are flogs