Jarrod Witts

[Bubbles]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

[AaronKirk]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

If he averages 70 which is around what he averaged in 2014 and 2015 up until the Round 9 bye for the suns he will get to around 315k.

Downgrade him to an FD and pocket around 200k or keep him a cover during the main byes when he will play each week. Doesn't sound like a bad R3 option.

I woundn't pick him at R2 either.

[RaisyDaisy]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

If he averages 70 which is around what he averaged in 2014 and 2015 up until the Round 9 bye for the suns he will get to around 315k.

Downgrade him to an FD and pocket around 200k or keep him a cover during the main byes when he will play each week. Doesn't sound like a bad R3 option.

I woundn't pick him at R2 either.

You'd want him to be the number 1 ruck and playing across the byes to provide cover for all 3 weeks

Is Nicholls and Witts in the same team an option? Or are we all just assuming no?

[GoLions]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

If he averages 70 which is around what he averaged in 2014 and 2015 up until the Round 9 bye for the suns he will get to around 315k.

Downgrade him to an FD and pocket around 200k or keep him a cover during the main byes when he will play each week. Doesn't sound like a bad R3 option.

I woundn't pick him at R2 either.

You'd want him to be the number 1 ruck and playing across the byes to provide cover for all 3 weeks

Is Nicholls and Witts in the same team an option? Or are we all just assuming no?

I don't think it is with the other talls they have in the team, and I'd say Nicholls is #1 when fully fit. Could be wrong though :P

[Holz]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

If he averages 70 which is around what he averaged in 2014 and 2015 up until the Round 9 bye for the suns he will get to around 315k.

Downgrade him to an FD and pocket around 200k or keep him a cover during the main byes when he will play each week. Doesn't sound like a bad R3 option.

I woundn't pick him at R2 either.

That 100k could be used to upgrade a glugg to swallow. A tmac to a shaw etc..

Just need that cash generating points on field as in this scenario you make 115k and burn a trade. Would rather use that trade to cut a rookie way too early like round 6-7.

Then of course downside of losing spot.

[AaronKirk]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

If he averages 70 which is around what he averaged in 2014 and 2015 up until the Round 9 bye for the suns he will get to around 315k.

Downgrade him to an FD and pocket around 200k or keep him a cover during the main byes when he will play each week. Doesn't sound like a bad R3 option.

I woundn't pick him at R2 either.

You'd want him to be the number 1 ruck and playing across the byes to provide cover for all 3 weeks

Is Nicholls and Witts in the same team an option? Or are we all just assuming no?

I don't think it is with the other talls they have in the team, and I'd say Nicholls is #1 when fully fit. Could be wrong though :P

Based on what I am hearing plus what is going on at suns pre-season training Witts has gone ahead of Nicholls as number 1.

Given Nicholls injury problems at the moment I don't see him in the side at round 1 so it is Witts spot to lose. I am not locking Witts in to R3 yet but I am happy with my side at the moment. If he has a 1/2 decent JLT he will be in my side at R3.

[Peter]

Me too

[GoLions]

I'm sorry I just think he is an aboustle spud and SuperCoach suicide going in with him at R2

If he averages 70 which is around what he averaged in 2014 and 2015 up until the Round 9 bye for the suns he will get to around 315k.

Downgrade him to an FD and pocket around 200k or keep him a cover during the main byes when he will play each week. Doesn't sound like a bad R3 option.

I woundn't pick him at R2 either.

You'd want him to be the number 1 ruck and playing across the byes to provide cover for all 3 weeks

Is Nicholls and Witts in the same team an option? Or are we all just assuming no?

I don't think it is with the other talls they have in the team, and I'd say Nicholls is #1 when fully fit. Could be wrong though :P

Based on what I am hearing plus what is going on at suns pre-season training Witts has gone ahead of Nicholls as number 1.

Given Nicholls injury problems at the moment I don't see him in the side at round 1 so it is Witts spot to lose. I am not locking Witts in to R3 yet but I am happy with my side at the moment. If he has a 1/2 decent JLT he will be in my side at R3.

Well with Nicholls injured, you would hope so :P

If Nicholls was 100% fit and Witts still got picked round 1, then I'd probably start him. But I really don't want to pick him and then see him either get dropped a few rounds in, or sharing the ruck duties with Nicholls and scoring poorly, so at this stage it's a no from me.

[meow meow]

Why not just go Nank instead if you're looking for a cheap ruck who'll be the #1 at their new team?

[AaronKirk]

After 1 quarter of a practice match you can put a line through Witts. He is getting dismantled by Archie Smith in the ruck.

[eaglesman]

After 1 quarter of a practice match you can put a line through Witts. He is getting dismantled by Archie Smith in the ruck.

Said the same thing about keefe the other night but people still like him

[RaisyDaisy]

After 1 quarter of a practice match you can put a line through Witts. He is getting dismantled by Archie Smith in the ruck.

Said the same thing about keefe the other night but people still like him

There's a big difference. One guy is 160k with solid JS and would be on field, where as the other guy is 200k sitting on the bench with dodgy JS

[eaglesman]

After 1 quarter of a practice match you can put a line through Witts. He is getting dismantled by Archie Smith in the ruck.

Said the same thing about keefe the other night but people still like him

There's a big difference. One guy is 160k with solid JS and would be on field, where as the other guy is 200k sitting on the bench with dodgy JS

I am not even convinced about his job security. All good I won't be picking him no matter what now but good luck

[RaisyDaisy]

After 1 quarter of a practice match you can put a line through Witts. He is getting dismantled by Archie Smith in the ruck.

Said the same thing about keefe the other night but people still like him

There's a big difference. One guy is 160k with solid JS and would be on field, where as the other guy is 200k sitting on the bench with dodgy JS

I am not even convinced about his job security. All good I won't be picking him no matter what now but good luck

He's a placeholder, but obv he's a KPP too

Ideally, Hampton gets a good run at things, and other defenders like EVW, Stewart, Newman, Ryan etc all play

[eaglesman]

After 1 quarter of a practice match you can put a line through Witts. He is getting dismantled by Archie Smith in the ruck.

Said the same thing about keefe the other night but people still like him

There's a big difference. One guy is 160k with solid JS and would be on field, where as the other guy is 200k sitting on the bench with dodgy JS

I am not even convinced about his job security. All good I won't be picking him no matter what now but good luck

He's a placeholder, but obv he's a KPP too

Ideally, Hampton gets a good run at things, and other defenders like EVW, Stewart, Newman, Ryan etc all play

Yeah they are my 4