Scott Selwood

[no eye deer]

Tbh probably could have scored a little higher looking at his stats and fantasy score. But yeah looked good

Personally think his stats showed a 120 score and he was hard done by by CD,
If he keeps this up could be a keeper at M9 with loopholing as well. Will be my m8 for a few weeks.

Lol if he keeps this up he can be my permanent M8 with Fyfe taking the loophole M9 spot!

Fyfe is gone at his bye. Not the player he once was. Fyfe --> Bont

Fyfe can hold a spot for for me now, mids will be finished with Rocky in next week. Then I'm 2 fwds away from a complete team with Fyfe at M8, plenty of trades in hand. Then I'll reassess on Fyfe.

He's due for a big score. Hopefully tomorrow. He can't have dropped off that much.
He doesn't seem happy, I think all the rumours are true, not liked by his peers, etc. will fire next year at a new club.

Hurts me to say it, as I bleed Purple blood. Unfortunately I bleed a lot! :-\

[Goosey]

I brought S.Selwood in DT from his first game back so very happy there, brought him in on the bubble in SC and am glad he managed to maintain the output, never know he may be a keeper.

[MontyJnr]

Tbh probably could have scored a little higher looking at his stats and fantasy score. But yeah looked good

Personally think his stats showed a 120 score and he was hard done by by CD,
If he keeps this up could be a keeper at M9 with loopholing as well. Will be my m8 for a few weeks.

Lol if he keeps this up he can be my permanent M8 with Fyfe taking the loophole M9 spot!

Fyfe is gone at his bye. Not the player he once was. Fyfe --> Bont

Too sideways IMO. Bont just doesn't get enough of the ball for consistent big scores.

If you didn't have any of Rocky, Dangerfield, Pendlebury, Selwood or Sloane then I would look to sideways Fyfe. Otherwise not worth it.

[no eye deer]

Tbh probably could have scored a little higher looking at his stats and fantasy score. But yeah looked good

Personally think his stats showed a 120 score and he was hard done by by CD,
If he keeps this up could be a keeper at M9 with loopholing as well. Will be my m8 for a few weeks.

Lol if he keeps this up he can be my permanent M8 with Fyfe taking the loophole M9 spot!

Fyfe is gone at his bye. Not the player he once was. Fyfe --> Bont

Too sideways IMO. Bont just doesn't get enough of the ball for consistent big scores.

If you didn't have any of Rocky, Dangerfield, Pendlebury, Selwood or Sloane then I would look to sideways Fyfe. Otherwise not worth it.

Not even sure you could throw Sloane into that mix, with him not handling the tag.

[King_Robbo]

I'd take Bont all day at his price. He's always finished seasons strongly and considering he's averaging 113 I think a 120+ average from here on in is not out of the question

[Bluesalltheway]

I'd take Bont all day at his price. He's always finished seasons strongly and considering he's averaging 113 I think a 120+ average from here on in is not out of the question

It really depends on whether they continue to throw him forward for really large stints

[MontyJnr]

I'd take Bont all day at his price. He's always finished seasons strongly and considering he's averaging 113 I think a 120+ average from here on in is not out of the question

I feel more comfortable going into games with midfield premiums that get more than 25 touches a game and don't rely on all of them perfectly hitting targets personally.

[Keeper27]

pretty with him as M9, might even move to M8 with the way Fyfe is scoring  :-\

[HoleMeal]

pretty with him as M9, might even move to M8 with the way Fyfe is scoring  :-\

104 is surely ok

[Keeper27]

pretty with him as M9, might even move to M8 with the way Fyfe is scoring  :-\

104 is surely ok

its ok, not great. But the majority have him so i guess its ok.

[Fid]

pretty with him as M9, might even move to M8 with the way Fyfe is scoring  :-\

104 is surely ok

it just ok imo....

he is still bleeding cash

[King_Robbo]

I'd take Bont all day at his price. He's always finished seasons strongly and considering he's averaging 113 I think a 120+ average from here on in is not out of the question

I feel more comfortable going into games with midfield premiums that get more than 25 touches a game and don't rely on all of them perfectly hitting targets personally.

Surely people have cottoned onto the fact that premos go through patches of form?! Look at Dusty and Jelwood. I bought both of them in 3-4 weeks ago after a below average few weeks and since then Martin has gone 105, 144, 125, 165 & Jelwood has gone 126, 134, 151
Bont will go on his run, no doubt

[sammy123]

bulldogs play sydney this week. in rd 2 bont scored 140 against them

[Carn]

Chris scott:

“They’re certainly not bad hamstrings where we’re worried about losing guys for a long period of time. But with those minor ones it’s really difficult to assess in the short term.

“Suffice to say we don’t think it will be more than a couple of weeks.”

[strikeforce]

Chris scott:

“They’re certainly not bad hamstrings where we’re worried about losing guys for a long period of time. But with those minor ones it’s really difficult to assess in the short term.

“Suffice to say we don’t think it will be more than a couple of weeks.”

So what do we do if its a 2 week hammy? I was planning on using Robbie and Scot as m7/m8 for a while and upgrading around them.