Main Menu

Nat Fyfe

Started by Bluesman, February 05, 2017, 10:35:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BomberSam

Quote from: Judd Magic on May 28, 2017, 01:40:35 AM
Trading Fyfe out for Sloane as soon as lockout opens.   8)

Is the only way to get Sloane in without flowering up my bye structure and before his price skyrockets!

Fyfe and Sloane are weak links in my team so both have to go.....

You must have a very strong team if Sloane is a weak link  :o

Mat0369

Well he is trading his weak link Fyfe out for his weak link Sloane  :P

Judd Magic

#47
Quote from: BomberSam on May 28, 2017, 01:49:01 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 28, 2017, 01:40:35 AM
Trading Fyfe out for Sloane as soon as lockout opens.   8)

Is the only way to get Sloane in without flowering up my bye structure and before his price skyrockets!

Fyfe and Sloane are weak links in my team so both have to go.....

You must have a very strong team if Sloane is a weak link  :o

Hah!

Was meant to be Shaw not Sloane.

Been on the beers all night so flowered up there with that typo....  :P

Just got Sloane on my flowering mind now after that 177.  ;D

Judd Magic

Quote from: Mat0369 on May 28, 2017, 01:50:39 AM
Well he is trading his weak link Fyfe out for his weak link Sloane  :P

LOL!  ;D

_wato

He had like 13 clangers last night including 6/7 FA's, no way that happens every week.

Been fairly consistent (lowest of 98 before this round), so there's no way I'm getting rid of him.

whynot102

I would trade Dahl before Fyfe the way he is going

Ricochet

No Sandi also a factor for Fyfe yesterday

SilverLion

Quote from: _wato on May 28, 2017, 09:20:07 AM
Been fairly consistent (lowest of 98 before this round), so there's no way I'm getting rid of him.

Actually, he got a 62 earlier in the year.

sammy123

i will assess when rd 13 hits. may go fyfe>neale/sloane

PICCOLLO

Quote from: sammy123 on May 28, 2017, 11:05:04 AM
i will assess when rd 13 hits. may go fyfe>neale/sloane

Might be a good move if you're r13 heavy like most of us.  His value might be a bit low though.

crowls

Quote from: _wato on May 28, 2017, 09:20:07 AM
He had like 13 clangers last night including 6/7 FA's, no way that happens every week.

Been fairly consistent (lowest of 98 before this round), so there's no way I'm getting rid of him.
words of wisdom from yoda....     BUT 13 clangers for christ sake.....

Gigantor

Quote from: crowls on May 28, 2017, 11:57:17 AM
Quote from: _wato on May 28, 2017, 09:20:07 AM
He had like 13 clangers last night including 6/7 FA's, no way that happens every week.

Been fairly consistent (lowest of 98 before this round), so there's no way I'm getting rid of him.
words of wisdom from yoda....     BUT 13 clangers for christ sake.....

Yeah every player has the odd shocker but he just doesn't look like getting the big 120+ atm to offset it.

Probably won't waste a trade but the recent trend is worrying, if I didn't have Shaw I probably wouldnt have even said anything  haha

shaker

To good a player to keep putting up scores like the last 5 weeks albeit 2 99's in there starting to think he might be a touch injured or dare I say not that happy ?

Judd Magic

Quote from: shaker on May 28, 2017, 12:34:00 PM
To good a player to keep putting up scores like the last 5 weeks albeit 2 99's in there starting to think he might be a touch injured or dare I say not that happy ?

I just reckon he doesn't give a toss anymore about playing with Freo and all he is thinking about is the big juicy contract that the Saints will be offering him next year.

Ricochet

Quote from: Judd Magic on May 28, 2017, 12:49:35 PM
Quote from: shaker on May 28, 2017, 12:34:00 PM
To good a player to keep putting up scores like the last 5 weeks albeit 2 99's in there starting to think he might be a touch injured or dare I say not that happy ?

I just reckon he doesn't give a toss anymore about playing with Freo and all he is thinking about is the big juicy contract that the Saints will be offering him next year.
Finally, we agree on something