Nat Fyfe

[crowls]

Any ideas what is Fyfe's problem this year.     What has changed that is keeping his scores around 100 and nothing large?   

[MC]

Any ideas what is Fyfe's problem this year.     What has changed that is keeping his scores around 100 and nothing large?

More time forward, averaging less kicks and goals overall and not winning matches off his own boot as he did. To be fair, his last quarter was impressive this week though, with a few intercepts leading directly to goals late in the game.

[crowls]

Any ideas what is Fyfe's problem this year.     What has changed that is keeping his scores around 100 and nothing large?

More time forward, averaging less kicks and goals overall and not winning matches off his own boot as he did. To be fair, his last quarter was impressive this week though, with a few intercepts leading directly to goals late in the game.

Thanks MC,  he is not on the trade block, though hoping Freo give him less fwd time in 2nd half of the season and we see an improvement in output.   Take him out of the Captain rotation though.

[shaker]

People were saying don't get Neale Fyfe is going to steal his points this year ha ha .... wrong  ::)

[Sabretooth Tigers]

People were saying don't get Neale Fyfe is going to steal his points this year ha ha .... wrong  ::)

One of the few things I have done right this year, got both.

[Dayze]

I've watched every freo game this year and this is how I see it.
Looked to b playing his usual position first two rounds. Maybe 70 mid 30 forward.

After all the backlash after the port loss freo changed their on ball brigade and put Stephen hill inside mid and pushed Mundy and fyfe mainly forward.
After the first quarter on Sunday Ross looked to have had enough of the fyfe forward experiment and looked to b playing almost exclusively on ball. I think he is about to start churning out some better scores.
I know it's been a wierd year but I think it's madness to consider moving fyfe on.
Top 5 player in the comp and will come good. Hope people do trade him

[LordSneeze]

Have to hold, prefer to spend the trade upgrading someone else and then having better bench cover.

[PICCOLLO]

I think this is what we are going to see from Fyfe all year sadly.  When he won the Charlie he seemed like one of their few offensive players and just dominated.  With Walters, the Hills and Neale going well, he just isn't required to dominate so much.  He's such a good mark too, playing him FWD makes a bit of sense. 

Dare I say it but his scores are suffering because Freo have a slightly more rounded team.

Luxury trade though. 

[Bluesalltheway]

I think this is what we are going to see from Fyfe all year sadly.  When he won the Charlie he seemed like one of their few offensive players and just dominated.  With Walters, the Hills and Neale going well, he just isn't required to dominate so much.  He's such a good mark too, playing him FWD makes a bit of sense. 

Dare I say it but his scores are suffering because Freo have a slightly more rounded team.

Luxury trade though.

Freo did finish 1st that year though.

[Peter]

On Dayze's advice, holding Fyfe

[Gigantor]

1-5    114
6-10  87

Luxury trade at his bye is an option, will be less than 500k unless he goes large next week  :o

[tommy10]

No chance he'll be traded out of my team.

[BomberSam]

No chance he'll be traded out of my team.

Highly, highly unlikely he will be traded out of mine.

[TomK]

Would be tough for anyone to score well with 13 clangers, but he isn't looking great.

[Judd Magic]

Trading Fyfe out for Sloane as soon as lockout opens.   8)

Is the only way to get Sloane in without flowering up my bye structure and before his price skyrockets!

Fyfe and Shaw are weak links in my team so both have to go.....