Matt Crouch

[kilbluff1985]

not that i have the balls to pick him but just surprised not much talk about him

think he is very likely to take another step this year

[RaisyDaisy]

Calling it now

Will never go 105+, hence irrelevant for SC

[Ricochet]

Calling it now

Will never go 105+, hence irrelevant for SC

I'm hanging onto this one

[Dudge]

A little on Raisy's side here, gets plenty of the ball, but for SC scoring i'll pass. AF and DT is a different kettle of fish though

[TomK]

Calling it now

Will never go 105+, hence irrelevant for SC

Obviously more suited to DT but never? Averaged 92 SC last year compared to 93 DT, not much difference there, and only coming into his fourth year now. I may be a little biased but I'd be willing to bet he will average over 105 SC at least once in his career.

[RaisyDaisy]

Calling it now

Will never go 105+, hence irrelevant for SC

I'm hanging onto this one

Hah, will probably come back to burn me!

105 is quite possible actually, but def won't be elite or good enough for SC spot

DT on the other hand..

[elephants]

Sky is the limit for DT, can see him going 120+ one day. And for that reason, I can def see him hitting 110 in SC through sheer volume of ball he racks up.

Danger isn't the greatest kick going around either, neither is Fyfe imo.

[LordSneeze]

The perfect case example for Crouch stats wise was Dion Prestia.
While its possible he will have a 105+ average as a once off, being able to guess when that might be is a fools errand. Especially in a crows team that has historically spread the points fairly well.

The question with Prestia now is how the move to Richmond changes his output.