Player X v Player Y

Started by _wato, January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bluesman

Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:13:40 PM
Quote from: Bluesman on March 25, 2017, 09:20:28 AM
Option 1: JPK (110) + Zac Jones (80) + 45k (190 total pts)
Option 2: Titch (105-110)+ Zac Jones + 97k (185-195 pts)
Option 3: Clayton Oliver (90-100) + heath shaw (100-105) + 10k (190-205)
Option 4: Clayton Oliver + Zac Jones + 290k (170 pts)

In brackets is what i believe they might average this year. I know most will probably say option 1, 2 or 3 but I really rate Oliver this year. Considering this I may only be 30 pts down in points but what it does do is open up the opportunity for me to grab the right corrective trades.  El.  Bowes, JPK or Titch etc... depending on who is performing better. Cheers in anticipation!
Option 1, don't like the Oliver pick personally, and prefer JPK over Tmitch
Thanks GL :)

GoLions

Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
My final decision.

Hibberd/Houston V Smith/Barrett
I dislike the JS of SMith, so would go Hibberd and Houston. Ideally though, you'd probably want Barrett in there as well.

GoLions

Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:16:59 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:15:57 PM
Cameron vs Strnadica?

Obviously Strnadica will be better for loopholing, but Cameron could make a bit of money. Not sure if he comes into the Swans 22 once his finger/hand/whatever recovers, and don't think it's worth starting him if he doesn't play until like halfway through the season...but if he does come in soon then he could be the better option. Not interested in Preuss, as I need the R/F DPP to swing Nank into the rucks if necessary.
Start with Strnadica.

Hopefully Cameron comes in at about round 5 and we can downgrade someone like Parfitt/Houston to him :)
Yeah, I'm kinda hoping he comes in after at least a month (if at all), because otherwise won't be worth downgrading to him in like round 3. Cheers mate :)

Money Shot

Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:23:28 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
My final decision.

Hibberd/Houston V Smith/Barrett
I dislike the JS of SMith, so would go Hibberd and Houston. Ideally though, you'd probably want Barrett in there as well.
I'm leaning towards Barret/Smith purely because Barrett has the best job security. Don't rate Hibberds job security tbh as Vickers-Willis is right behind him, Houston has Bonner who is right behind him and Impey, Krakouer coming in next week could take his spot, yes Smith's is the worst but I don't rate the other guys much better.

tkringle

Gawn & Florent vs Martin & Steele?

GCSkiwi

Quote from: tkringle on March 25, 2017, 01:06:23 PM
Gawn & Florent vs Martin & Steele?

Gawn and Florent for me.

Which two of Miles, Florent and Parfitt?

Mat0369

Miles isn't playing so I'd go with Florent and Parfitt.

tkringle


Mat0369


tkringle


Rusty00

#970
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:

Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?

Or I could go Steele/Rough + Swalllow and keep cash for early upgrades?

Or I could Taranto > Bowes/Florent to get the cash for Higgins + Steele?

TomK

Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:54:24 PM
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:

Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Higgins and Swallow no doubt I reckon

Rusty00

Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 02:56:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:54:24 PM
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:

Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Higgins and Swallow no doubt I reckon
Thanks, I added some edits as well.

TomK

Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:58:44 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 02:56:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:54:24 PM
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:

Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Higgins and Swallow no doubt I reckon
Thanks, I added some edits as well.
If you're set on Steele, I don't mind him and Swallow. I don't mind the Steele and Higgins option either but depending on where Taranto was, if he was F6, go for it, if F5, I wouldn't feel that comfortable then.

Mat0369

I like Steele and Swallow if you can swing that with Taranto as a rookie.