Player X v Player Y

[crowls]

Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch


Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.


Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated

[enzedder]

Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch


Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.


Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated

I was tinkering with some changes this morning...namely, Nankervis coming in, Higgins going out, gave me more funds to play with. Then looked at dumping Gawn and switching Nank to R2 which meant I had more funds to play with and could bring in Macrae.
What I have presently settled on is Nank in fwds as the extra funds have allowed me to upgrade elsewhere.
I like the first 3 choices over the latter 2 but I suppose it comes down to what you can do with the change as they are all different prices.

My X v Y would be...

Nank/ Howe  v Higgins/Mills

[Mongoose528]

Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch


Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.


Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated

I was tinkering with some changes this morning...namely, Nankervis coming in, Higgins going out, gave me more funds to play with. Then looked at dumping Gawn and switching Nank to R2 which meant I had more funds to play with and could bring in Macrae.
What I have presently settled on is Nank in fwds as the extra funds have allowed me to upgrade elsewhere.
I like the first 3 choices over the latter 2 but I suppose it comes down to what you can do with the change as they are all different prices.

My X v Y would be...

Nank/ Howe  v Higgins/Mills

Nank/Howe imo

[crowls]

Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch


Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.


Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated

I was tinkering with some changes this morning...namely, Nankervis coming in, Higgins going out, gave me more funds to play with. Then looked at dumping Gawn and switching Nank to R2 which meant I had more funds to play with and could bring in Macrae.
What I have presently settled on is Nank in fwds as the extra funds have allowed me to upgrade elsewhere.
I like the first 3 choices over the latter 2 but I suppose it comes down to what you can do with the change as they are all different prices.

My X v Y would be...

Nank/ Howe  v Higgins/Mills

Nank/Howe imo

Thanks guys,  Had Howe in some of my earlier teams.   Would be comfortable with him as an option.   Not keen on Mills.  still too young to be reliable enough.

[Gandalf123]

Rance and Cameron v Nank and Marchbank/Z.jones

[Mongoose528]

Rance and Cameron v Nank and Marchbank/Z.jones

Nank/Marchbank imo

[billnats]

Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips

[Mongoose528]

Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips

Goldy & D. Swallow easily

[uncleswagy]

Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips

Goldy & D. Swallow easily

its a no brainer to me

[Diesels Pups]

Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.

ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.

[crowls]

Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.

ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.

see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer.     up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.   

[Mongoose528]

Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.

ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.

see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer.     up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.   

Yeah, Beams is much more likely to get injured.

[Southstorm]

Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.

ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.

see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer.     up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.   

I don't know if Jobe will go back to his 120+, supplement-aided best but I'd back him in to go better than 105. The dude is in excellent shape and has never had a better on-ball brigade around him.

[Hawker_08]

I have a couple:

Rocky vs JPK vs Hanners (that is my order atm)

and

Greene/Caddy + Goldy vs NRoo + Grundy (currently have second option as I don't 100% trust greene/caddy)

[billnats]

I have a couple:

Rocky vs JPK vs Hanners (that is my order atm)

and

Greene/Caddy + Goldy vs NRoo + Grundy (currently have second option as I don't 100% trust greene/caddy)

Green + Caddy
I would go Hanners personally