Player X v Player Y

Started by _wato, January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

GoLions

Quote from: billnats on February 25, 2017, 09:35:07 AM
Currently have a rookie at F6 but really struggling with no one standing out.

A) Hanners, Lids, Rookie
B) Shiel, Heeney, Roughy

B option I'm only 2K off Sloane so I can replace Shiel with any mid up to 590K
Option A, gives you 2 top end premos and a rookie to make some cash, as opposed to 3 guys who might be keepers but might not and you'll end up having to waste trades on all of them. Keep an eye on Lids' pre-season though, no guarantee that he'll be ready for round 1.

GoLions

Quote from: EazyMoney on February 25, 2017, 01:56:19 PM
Quote from: freddo81 on February 25, 2017, 09:59:47 AM
Titch vs Bont vs Sloane vs Steven vs Priddis?
I know all are solid picks but torn on who to start.

Bont imo
If Sloaney is looking good for round 1 then I'd go with him. If not, then probably Bont.

GoLions

Quote from: js19 on February 25, 2017, 06:23:15 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 25, 2017, 05:39:05 AM
Ryder + Roughead vs Heeney + Nankervis

Have had Ryder and Rough in all year long, but am seriously thinking the latter might generate more points

Heeney and Nank for mine
See how Nank goes in the next 2 JLT games, think Sauce was only rucking for half the game for the Crows.

GoLions

Quote from: crowls on February 25, 2017, 12:04:03 AM
Quote from: cptawesom3 on February 24, 2017, 11:53:02 PM
Nankervis and Laird vs Macrae and Vlastuin
nank and laird.    more potential upside to nank and laird should outscore macrea
Yeah agreed, simply because I really don't like the Vlastuin pick :P

GoLions

Quote from: dmac07 on February 24, 2017, 06:53:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 24, 2017, 06:10:02 PM
Rance vs Tmac vs Laird?

Currently have both Rance and Tmac. Tmac's end to last season was amazing and feel he is fairly underpriced and see him as a top 10 defender. Rance has been ultra consistent for a while now, but had a slightly interrupted pre-season. Managed to get a bit extra cash today after getting some dirt over the fellas at SC HQ, so can now either turn Tmac into Laird, or just straight swap Rance for Laird. Leaning towards the Tmac + Laird combo now.

Laird > Tmac > Rance

Rance the most reliable, lokely to play every game and average 95, but this year there seems to be multiple options capable of going 100+ in defense when previously 95 was good enough.

Tmac can score big but more of an unkown.

Laird the most popular probably but also the best, can still improve and wouldnt be suprised to see him go 105 average.
Cheers mate, pretty much my thoughts as well :)

dmac07

Bontempelli & A.Black

V

D.Beams & J.Elliot

Do I go the sure premium and dodgy rookie priced player, or Beams and Elliot to sure up the on field forwards, Hoskin-Elliot, Bowes, Black/Butler currently occupy my F4-7 which feels a little risky.

GoLions

Quote from: dmac07 on February 25, 2017, 03:40:23 PM
Bontempelli & A.Black

V

D.Beams & J.Elliot

Do I go the sure premium and dodgy rookie priced player, or Beams and Elliot to sure up the on field forwards, Hoskin-Elliot, Bowes, Black/Butler currently occupy my F4-7 which feels a little risky.
See how Beams, Elliott, and Black go throughout the JLT. Personally, I'd be leaning towards Bont and Black, as I don't see Elliott making enough cash to justify the pick. Need Black to cement his spot for round 1 though, and I don't know too much about his JS unfortunately.

Mongoose528

Quote from: GoLions on February 25, 2017, 03:47:13 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on February 25, 2017, 03:40:23 PM
Bontempelli & A.Black

V

D.Beams & J.Elliot

Do I go the sure premium and dodgy rookie priced player, or Beams and Elliot to sure up the on field forwards, Hoskin-Elliot, Bowes, Black/Butler currently occupy my F4-7 which feels a little risky.
See how Beams, Elliott, and Black go throughout the JLT. Personally, I'd be leaning towards Bont and Black, as I don't see Elliott making enough cash to justify the pick. Need Black to cement his spot for round 1 though, and I don't know too much about his JS unfortunately.

I'd go for Bont + Black as well

billnats

Stuck on this one:
Roughy and O'Meara
Or
Macrae and Rookie (e.g. Ainsworth)

Bully

Quote from: billnats on February 27, 2017, 12:24:08 AM
Stuck on this one:
Roughy and O'Meara
Or
Macrae and Rookie (e.g. Ainsworth)

Same deal for me only slightly different players. I'd go Roughie & O'Meara (I just switched Bont & McCluggage to O'Meara & Roughie).

billnats

O'Meara into midfield lets me swing across Ainsworth or another higher priced rookie.

Roughy did look good today!

Keeper27

Roughy & O'Meara vs. Hanners and Rookie FWD

Hanners is a top 15 mid and he'll be one of my 6 elite mids.
roughy can go 85-90, o'meara can go 95-100

Vulpes

Assuming both can hit 95+:

Higgins with his horrible injury record
or
Wingard with his horrible bye-but-not-a-bye (even worse if I take Ryder for Ruck cover)

whynot102

Option 1 greater scoring potential 
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 27, 2017, 10:31:03 AM
Roughy & O'Meara vs. Hanners and Rookie FWD

Hanners is a top 15 mid and he'll be one of my 6 elite mids.
roughy can go 85-90, o'meara can go 95-100

GoLions

Quote from: Vulpes on February 27, 2017, 04:29:37 PM
Assuming both can hit 95+:

Higgins with his horrible injury record
or
Wingard with his horrible bye-but-not-a-bye (even worse if I take Ryder for Ruck cover)
I'm reaaaaaaaally tempted to start Higgins atm, if he gets enough midfield minutes should go 95ish imo, not many other players at North who will be taking away points (Goldy, then...? Jmac, Ziebell, Cunners I guess but not 100+ scorers). So yeah, Higgins over Wingard imo