Player X v Player Y

Started by _wato, January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Keeper27

Swallow vs. McLuggage vs. Taranto

leaning towards Swallow as he's proven, but an extra $80k would be nice

Mongoose528

Quote from: Keeper27 on February 20, 2017, 11:31:59 AM
Swallow vs. McLuggage vs. Taranto

leaning towards Swallow as he's proven, but an extra $80k would be nice

Don't start with Taranto, I'll doubt he'll get game time. I would start with both Clugg and Swallow.

Ringo

Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6

The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.


Gandalf123

Quote from: Ringo on February 20, 2017, 02:57:38 PM
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6

The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.

Tough one, I'm waiting to watch hartlett this week as he is one I'm keen on, can't bring myself to trust beams, not a priddis fan but have had him before and is most definitely one of the more consistent SC'ers out there, I'd go the first option.

crowls

Quote from: Keeper27 on February 20, 2017, 11:31:59 AM
Swallow vs. McLuggage vs. Taranto

leaning towards Swallow as he's proven, but an extra $80k would be nice
Swallow,  come Rd 9 will be an easy trade into whichever Superprem you are missing.     Also likely to outscore both of Mclug and Taranto by 20 pts a game and no JS risk.     harder decision would be Swallor or JOM?




RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Ringo on February 20, 2017, 02:57:38 PM
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6

The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.

Am I missing something?

HH/Beams more or less same price but Priddis vs Laird 70k difference

So you can basically pick any other mid? I'd grab other mids before Prid at that price

Ringo

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 20, 2017, 05:36:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on February 20, 2017, 02:57:38 PM
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6

The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.

Am I missing something?

HH/Beams more or less same price but Priddis vs Laird 70k difference

So you can basically pick any other mid? I'd grab other mids before Prid at that price
To explain a little better RD
It is the combination that is the issue - If I go Priddis then Hartlett is the defender I can afford but if I drop Priddis to Beams I can go Laird.

NickyBoy

Priddis vs Rocky

Adams vs Tmac vs Jmac vs Laird

Macrae vs Caddy vs Higgins

D3, M4 and F2 have me pulling my hair out. I keep chopping and changing each person

TomK

Quote from: NickyBoy on February 20, 2017, 07:28:03 PM
Priddis vs Rocky

Adams vs Tmac vs Jmac vs Laird

Macrae vs Caddy vs Higgins

D3, M4 and F2 have me pulling my hair out. I keep chopping and changing each person
Rocky, Laird, Macrae

Fid


crowls

Quote from: Fid on February 20, 2017, 07:58:41 PM
Rocky, Laird, Caddy
Rocky, Adams, Caddy   (reckon Miller is a better option than Caddy)

Samsturmfels

(Tmitch+ Beams) vs (Rockliff + O'Meara + 75k)

Mongoose528

Quote from: Samsturmfels on February 21, 2017, 12:22:17 AM
(Tmitch+ Beams) vs (Rockliff + O'Meara + 75k)

Rockliff +O'Meara + 75k because Beams isn't fully fit.

Keeper27


NickyBoy

Quote from: EazyMoney on February 21, 2017, 09:31:16 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on February 21, 2017, 12:22:17 AM
(Tmitch+ Beams) vs (Rockliff + O'Meara + 75k)

Rockliff +O'Meara + 75k because Beams isn't fully fit.
Also some uncertainty with Tmitch moving to the hawks. I'm hoping he plays a JLT game