Player X v Player Y

[enzedder]

Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list

Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty

I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^

Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty

Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.

[dmac07]

Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list

Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty

I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^

Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty

Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.

Wow, lot of Rocky love  :o

Treloar > Sloane > JPK > Rocky > Jelly > Dusty

[Mongoose528]

Goldy + Ainsworth + 8k v Ryder + Sandilands + 68k

[Samsturmfels]

Goldy + Ainsworth + 8k v Ryder + Sandilands + 68k

Option 1. option 2 is too risky for me. We dont know how high Ryder will be able to average after returning from a years suspension and only averaging roughly 86 his previous season. Yes Sandilands has huge value, but at 34 yrs old will he be able to produce an high enough output and avoid getting injured?

[GoLions]

Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list

Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty

I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^

Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty

Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.

Wow, lot of Rocky love  :o

Treloar > Sloane > JPK > Rocky > Jelly > Dusty

Weird that you have Rocky in the middle there. From an avg perspective, he is clearly the best of this lot, and from a durability perspective, clearly the worst :P

[GoLions]

Goldy + Ainsworth + 8k v Ryder + Sandilands + 68k

Option 1. option 2 is too risky for me. We dont know how high Ryder will be able to average after returning from a years suspension and only averaging roughly 86 his previous season. Yes Sandilands has huge value, but at 34 yrs old will he be able to produce an high enough output and avoid getting injured?

Yeah go option 1, but keep an eye on Goldy throughout the pre-season

[BomberSam]

Hanners vs. Treloar?

[Gandalf123]

Hanners vs. Treloar?

Hanners

[uncleswagy]

Hanners vs. Treloar?

probably cant go wrong with either, both have pretty much the same selection% too

coin flip for me

[eaglesman]

Beams and sandi 740k

Vs

Swallow and stef Martin 766k

[HoleMeal]

Beams and sandi 740k

Vs

Swallow and stef Martin 766k

Less risk with this option

[frenzy]

Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list

Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty

I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^

Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty

Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.

Wow, lot of Rocky love  :o

Treloar > Sloane > JPK > Rocky > Jelly > Dusty

the lack of love for Jelwood is just amazing.  :o he has missed going 110+ once in the last 8 seasons, and Treloar has been there once.

[_wato]

Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy

[BomberSam]

Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy

Apparently Gunno is a pretty safe option. If this is correct, I'd go with Gunno and Swallow. Beams and Roughy more upside by a long shot, but the other option is safer. Loving Roughy though, not sure whether I'll fit him in or not yet.

[AaronKirk]

Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy

Scooter isn't SC relevant IMO.

Beams and Roughy have a lot more upside than Swallow/Gunston but Swallow is flying and Gunston is solid for a 90-100 season.

The safe option is Swallow/Gunston but Beams and Rough could score 220 a week between them.

I haven't told you anything you don't know ha but you don't win SC without taking risks. Beams/Roughy for me.