Player X v Player Y

[WizzFizz]

Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy

and

TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie 

[Holz]

Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy

and

TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie

None

Rance Laird easy

[fasttrack13]

Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy

and

TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie

None

Rance Laird easy

Pretty much

[WizzFizz]

Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy

and

TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie

None

Rance Laird easy

what do u think of swallow?

[frenzy]

GAJ vs Beams

[shaker]

Gaz is nearly 200k more than Beams so if you have 620k up your sleeve for Gaz I think there are many better value players for that so I would go Beams or a different player

[fasttrack13]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

[shaker]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn

[enzedder]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn

Same... Gawn and Adams.

[LordSneeze]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn

Same... Gawn and Adams.

I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110

Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.

[Huttabito]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn

Same... Gawn and Adams.

I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110

Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.

Adams actually scored 3/14 under 80 last season and averaged 97 with 7 over 100, also averaged 97 in 2015. You couldn't possibly be expecting less than an average of 95 from Adams. The question is more if he can stay on the park for the entire season.

I'd be expecting them to average more or less the same... Grundy (105) and Shaw (105) vs Gawn (115) and Adams (95) although I'd be leaning towards Gawn/Adams as they are more capable of going higher than stated.

But I do agree with danger with picking Adams given his recent injury history and the range of other premiums at a similar price.

[shaker]

I think Adams is due for some luck injury wise it is not like he has a chronic problem , hammy , knee , quad I think over last couple of years , he is coming into his prime I'm tipping he will top the ton this year easily  ;) even thinking of starting him M4 or 5

[Money Shot]

Gawn + O'meara/Swallow v Sandi + Treloar

Don't know why but I'm leaning towards Gawn and Swallow. 

[LordSneeze]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn

Same... Gawn and Adams.

I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110

Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.

Adams actually scored 3/14 under 80 last season and averaged 97 with 7 over 100, also averaged 97 in 2015. You couldn't possibly be expecting less than an average of 95 from Adams. The question is more if he can stay on the park for the entire season.

I'd be expecting them to average more or less the same... Grundy (105) and Shaw (105) vs Gawn (115) and Adams (95) although I'd be leaning towards Gawn/Adams as they are more capable of going higher than stated.

But I do agree with danger with picking Adams given his recent injury history and the range of other premiums at a similar price.

Well I was looking at Marcus Adams not Taylor Adams.

[DunnyBrush]

GAJ vs Beams

Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.



Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn

Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn

Same... Gawn and Adams.

I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110

Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.

Who are these other options? Gawn,Goldy,Grundy and Martin.
Gawn is max price, many people are looking at Goldy's knee issues last year + 2-3 top clearance players retired and North are going to fall harder than some think and the games over the last 2 years where Goldy put up huge numbers he scored 2 or 3 goals in, 3rd man up rule change working in Gawn/goldys favour tho.

I had Martin last year, he might go well this year but i am not going there again so it's Gawn/Grundy + Sandi at R2

Grundy/Sandi is looking like a real money saver with not much downside and a chance to see if Goldy can again match Gawn.