Which Rucks?

[shaker]

I'm settled with Hickey and Sandilands. Hickey should be the lone ruckman this year.

Don't count Longer being named R1 or worse coming into the team early in the year he has been impressive preseason as well

[Cookie Monster]

I'm settled with Hickey and Sandilands. Hickey should be the lone ruckman this year.

Don't count Longer being named R1 or worse coming into the team early in the year he has been impressive preseason as well

Well the Saints rolled with all 3 options in the JLT series and I reckon they played their best when Hickey was sole ruck so I'm pretty confident that he'll be alone in round one and throughout most of the year. Pending form of Hickey and Longer.

[shaker]

I'm settled with Hickey and Sandilands. Hickey should be the lone ruckman this year.

Don't count Longer being named R1 or worse coming into the team early in the year he has been impressive preseason as well

Well the Saints rolled with all 3 options in the JLT series and I reckon they played their best when Hickey was sole ruck so I'm pretty confident that he'll be alone in round one and throughout most of the year. Pending form of Hickey and Longer.

The only other player they used for a couple of H/O's is Bruce I was keen on him to after his last game but saw an article maybe on the AFL site or TV can't remember and the coach was praising both of them , think Longer kicked a bag of goals the same week Hickey had a blinder lets see what happens R1

[Cookie Monster]

I'm settled with Hickey and Sandilands. Hickey should be the lone ruckman this year.

Don't count Longer being named R1 or worse coming into the team early in the year he has been impressive preseason as well

Well the Saints rolled with all 3 options in the JLT series and I reckon they played their best when Hickey was sole ruck so I'm pretty confident that he'll be alone in round one and throughout most of the year. Pending form of Hickey and Longer.

The only other player they used for a couple of H/O's is Bruce I was keen on him to after his last game but saw an article maybe on the AFL site or TV can't remember and the coach was praising both of them , think Longer kicked a bag of goals the same week Hickey had a blinder lets see what happens R1

Longer didn't play when Hickey dominated.

[shaker]

I'm settled with Hickey and Sandilands. Hickey should be the lone ruckman this year.

Don't count Longer being named R1 or worse coming into the team early in the year he has been impressive preseason as well

Well the Saints rolled with all 3 options in the JLT series and I reckon they played their best when Hickey was sole ruck so I'm pretty confident that he'll be alone in round one and throughout most of the year. Pending form of Hickey and Longer.

The only other player they used for a couple of H/O's is Bruce I was keen on him to after his last game but saw an article maybe on the AFL site or TV can't remember and the coach was praising both of them , think Longer kicked a bag of goals the same week Hickey had a blinder lets see what happens R1

Longer didn't play when Hickey dominated.

Longer did not play in the game with Hickey must of been in the 2's

[meow meow]

McKernan upgraded. Jump on now before it's too late!

[elephants]

McKernan upgraded. Jump on now before it's too late!

If only he was a ruckman, I'd be all over him like shower on Fremantle

[Samsturmfels]

Even if he was a ruckman I wouldnt go near him

[eaglesman]

Im taking the option of

Goldy (If pruess not named, Witts if he is)

Preuss won't be named. Lock in goldy? I still. It sure. Goldy will go 120+ this week

[enzedder]

As a Saints fan I think Hickey will be#1 ruck based on last year and strong pre season. Don't think Longer will play in the same22 unless match ups deem it logical. That being said, Longer has had a good pre season and was #1 in 2015. If Hickey's form slips Longer will get his chance. As such Saints rucks are best avoided.
Rucks are easy this year. No worries, no stress. 8)

[jvalles69]

Team looks better turning Ryder into Goldy...

[meow meow]

McKernan upgraded. Jump on now before it's too late!

If only he was a ruckman, I'd be all over him like shower on Fremantle

He doesn't have ruck status? Baffling! Did not know that.

[meow meow]

Nank is priced at 68 right? So if picking him you'd expect him to be a top 6 forward, correct? As a ruck he won't be a top guy, and as a cow he won't make as much coin as you could with a different option unless he goes 100+

Witts on the other hand should make plenty of dollah to justify selection. Might go with him and Kreuzer.

[meow meow]

Vardy priced at 49 should rise in price by 30+

Witts priced at 40 could, should, will make that 30+ rise.

Sandi priced at 57 would make 30+ if he wasn't going to get injured in the 2nd quarter of round 3.

English has to average just 54 to make my baseline amount.

Nank to average 98? Big ask! Possible, yes. Probable, ich don't think so.

[tommy10]

'Assuming' that Preuss is playing, would you have Nank and Sandi as R1 & R2 with Witts as R3? Then you won't need a Fwd/ruck option, and can go heavy in the Fwds. Anyone thinking this? You still have Witts and he will generate cash.