Main Menu

Which Rucks?

Started by RaisyDaisy, December 12, 2016, 12:27:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bully

Nank taking the honours over Ryder. Might have to reassess my back-up situation.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Bully on March 05, 2017, 06:46:44 PM
Nank taking the honours over Ryder. Might have to reassess my back-up situation.

It's Nank or nothing for me. Just not liking Ryder at all and today just confirms it

1/2 time and Ryder has ZERO possessions with 14 hitouts

Bully

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 05, 2017, 06:52:15 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 05, 2017, 06:46:44 PM
Nank taking the honours over Ryder. Might have to reassess my back-up situation.

It's Nank or nothing for me. Just not liking Ryder at all and today just confirms it

1/2 time and Ryder has ZERO possessions with 14 hitouts

Nank killing him around the ground and that's Ryder's strength. The extra 60k will also come in handy.

shaker

Don't understand why people going with Sandi have the need to spend close to or more than 400K for someone in there FWD's that might avg. 80 if they are lucky then if Sandi gets injured they are willing to move that average avg. into the rucks and then weaken there forward line in the process ... be bold take a risk and if Sandi fails trade him out .

js19

Nank 106 at 3/4 time with Maric in the team. Make of that what you want.

TomK

Quote from: shaker on March 05, 2017, 07:35:28 PM
Don't understand why people going with Sandi have the need to spend close to or more than 400K for someone in there FWD's that might avg. 80 if they are lucky then if Sandi gets injured they are willing to move that average avg. into the rucks and then weaken there forward line in the process ... be bold take a risk and if Sandi fails trade him out .
Are you saying Ryder and Nank would be lucky to average 80? lol

Mat0369

Quote from: js19 on March 05, 2017, 07:38:03 PM
Nank 106 at 3/4 time with Maric in the team. Make of that what you want.

I'm pretty sure Maric has just come on.

Quote from: TomK on March 05, 2017, 07:39:41 PM
Are you saying Ryder and Nank would be lucky to average 80? lol

Nank will probably go 75-80, Ryder will inconsistently average a floor of 85 to a ceiling of 105 so I'll say a 95 average for the season. 

shaker

#262
Quote from: TomK on March 05, 2017, 07:39:41 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 05, 2017, 07:35:28 PM
Don't understand why people going with Sandi have the need to spend close to or more than 400K for someone in there FWD's that might avg. 80 if they are lucky then if Sandi gets injured they are willing to move that average avg. into the rucks and then weaken there forward line in the process ... be bold take a risk and if Sandi fails trade him out .
Are you saying Ryder and Nank would be lucky to average 80? lol

Yep if you would not pick them normally don't pick them to cover someone else

GCSkiwi

Quote from: Mat0369 on March 05, 2017, 07:42:34 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 05, 2017, 07:39:41 PM
Are you saying Ryder and Nank would be lucky to average 80? lol

Nank will probably go 75-80, Ryder will inconsistently average a floor of 85 to a ceiling of 105 so I'll say a 95 average for the season.

85-105 sounds consistent as hell to me haha! for 418k I think that would have to be close to a lock. I don't think he's going to go that well and I'm having a reassessment.

jfitty

Nankervis and Sandilands looking tempting ??? ???

Is Hampson fit Tigers fans? Surely they wouldn't play two of these three guys

Mat0369

Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 05, 2017, 07:48:05 PM
85-105 sounds consistent as hell to me haha! for 418k I think that would have to be close to a lock. I don't think he's going to go that well and I'm having a reassessment.

Week to week he isn't consistent at all. He has always put up stinkers or found a way to get suspended. Considering the bye it's not ideal and I wouldn't want to fork out 400k for an 85 average to start the year. Wait until he has his bye, drops in price and grab him then as cover for the year and a loophole option at F6.

_wato

Yeah only thing that worries me is Hampson. What's he doing?

Maric will not play. If Nank plays lonesome Round 1 he'll be super tempting

Bully

Quote from: _wato on March 05, 2017, 07:57:10 PM
Yeah only thing that worries me is Hampson. What's he doing?

Maric will not play. If Nank plays lonesome Round 1 he'll be super tempting

We'll play one ruck only, Griffiths will play back up. I reckon today has convinced me to pick Nankervis, 15 touches (10 contested), 22 hit outs, 5 tackles and 1 goal.


Gigantor

Quote from: _wato on March 05, 2017, 07:57:10 PM
Yeah only thing that worries me is Hampson. What's he doing?

Maric will not play. If Nank plays lonesome Round 1 he'll be super tempting

Another issue with Nank is you will have to lock him in on Thursday before the Sunday teams are finalised

_wato

Quote from: Gigantor on March 05, 2017, 08:07:12 PM
Quote from: _wato on March 05, 2017, 07:57:10 PM
Yeah only thing that worries me is Hampson. What's he doing?

Maric will not play. If Nank plays lonesome Round 1 he'll be super tempting

Another issue with Nank is you will have to lock him in on Thursday before the Sunday teams are finalised

What's wrong with that? I'd rather that tbh, imagine choosing him and then finding out on Sunday he's playing with Hampson or Maric who are late call ups. That'd stuff you right over.