British xv Confirmed Trades and Rulings 2016/17

[Koop]

Grope Lane give: nat 20 + D. Cuningham
Hebdenbridge Hedgehogs give: nat 11

Reasoning: Hedbenbridge were interested in Cuningham and he was surplus to our needs. We did use pick 26 to draft him last year so the pick upgrade from 20 to 11 is suffice for us to move him on.

Koop to confirm in TDog absence

Confirm

Willing to move back 9 spots in the draft for someone who should get more game time with Gibbs leaving. I back myself topick someone up @ 20 to justify taking the punt.

[Ringo]

Grope Lane give: nat 20 + D. Cuningham
Hebdenbridge Hedgehogs give: nat 11

Reasoning: Hedbenbridge were interested in Cuningham and he was surplus to our needs. We did use pick 26 to draft him last year so the pick upgrade from 20 to 11 is suffice for us to move him on.

Koop to confirm in TDog absence

Confirm

Willing to move back 9 spots in the draft for someone who should get more game time with Softie leaving. I back myself topick someone up @ 20 to justify taking the punt.

Although Koop is assistant at Hebden Bridge he can not confirm trades so Tdog still needs to confirm prior to approval. Only Coaches or Co-Coaches can confirm trades as per rules.

[Rids]

Grope Lane give: nat 20 + D. Cuningham
Hebdenbridge Hedgehogs give: nat 11

Reasoning: Hedbenbridge were interested in Cuningham and he was surplus to our needs. We did use pick 26 to draft him last year so the pick upgrade from 20 to 11 is suffice for us to move him on.

Koop to confirm in TDog absence

Confirm

Willing to move back 9 spots in the draft for someone who should get more game time with Softie leaving. I back myself topick someone up @ 20 to justify taking the punt.

Although Koop is assistant at Hebden Bridge he can not confirm trades so Tdog still needs to confirm prior to approval. Only Coaches or Co-Coaches can confirm trades as per rules.

Any word on TDog? Hasnt been online since the 2nd

[kilbluff1985]

he just been busy with work

[Rids]

he just been busy with work

It has been 2 weeks now. If TDog can't log on over this period of time then I would suggest that Koop should be a co-coach of the team due to the time constraints the coach has.

[nas]

he just been busy with work

It has been 2 weeks now. If TDog can't log on over this period of time then I would suggest that Koop should be a co-coach of the team due to the time constraints the coach has.

Reckon that I would have to disagree as this is the first time in ages that T Dog hasn't been active. Must be really snowed under with work commitments ATM. Sure that he will be on, sooner or later!

[Nige]

Don't think anyone has a problem with Coop being co-coach though, doubt T Dog himself would.

That said, until Coop is officially co-coach, the above ruling is probably fair.

[Rids]

he just been busy with work

It has been 2 weeks now. If TDog can't log on over this period of time then I would suggest that Koop should be a co-coach of the team due to the time constraints the coach has.

Reckon that I would have to disagree as this is the first time in ages that T Dog hasn't been active. Must be really snowed under with work commitments ATM. Sure that he will be on, sooner or later!

Happy to wait until he is back on for him to make that decision. But I would think it is a no brainer if someone's workload means they cant even log into fanfooty via mobile within a 2 week period.

[nostradamus]

he just been busy with work

It has been 2 weeks now. If TDog can't log on over this period of time then I would suggest that Koop should be a co-coach of the team due to the time constraints the coach has.

Reckon that I would have to disagree as this is the first time in ages that T Dog hasn't been active. Must be really snowed under with work commitments ATM. Sure that he will be on, sooner or later!

Happy to wait until he is back on for him to make that decision. But I would think it is a no brainer if someone's workload means they cant even log into fanfooty via mobile within a 2 week period.

wasn't there also a period of inactivity just prior to him last being online too, pretty sure it was around a week or so.

[Koop]

he just been busy with work

It has been 2 weeks now. If TDog can't log on over this period of time then I would suggest that Koop should be a co-coach of the team due to the time constraints the coach has.

Reckon that I would have to disagree as this is the first time in ages that T Dog hasn't been active. Must be really snowed under with work commitments ATM. Sure that he will be on, sooner or later!

Happy to wait until he is back on for him to make that decision. But I would think it is a no brainer if someone's workload means they cant even log into fanfooty via mobile within a 2 week period.

wasn't there also a period of inactivity just prior to him last being online too, pretty sure it was around a week or so.

Yep. Been on once in the past 22 days.

Happy to wait however.

[Rids]

Grope Lane give: nat 20 + D. Cuningham
Hebdenbridge Hedgehogs give: nat 11

Reasoning: Hedbenbridge were interested in Cuningham and he was surplus to our needs. We did use pick 26 to draft him last year so the pick upgrade from 20 to 11 is suffice for us to move him on.

Koop to confirm in TDog absence

Confirm

Willing to move back 9 spots in the draft for someone who should get more game time with Softie leaving. I back myself topick someone up @ 20 to justify taking the punt.

Although Koop is assistant at Hebden Bridge he can not confirm trades so Tdog still needs to confirm prior to approval. Only Coaches or Co-Coaches can confirm trades as per rules.

Any update with this?

[nas]

Steins give: ND #48.
Leechers give: Nick Robertson.

Nick Robertson may get some more game time with Hanley gone, & Leechers after another draft pick.
jhello to confirm.

[jhello]

Steins give: ND #48.
Leechers give: Nick Robertson.

Nick Robertson may get some more game time with Hanley gone, & Leechers after another draft pick.
jhello to confirm.

Confirmed. Happy enough with mid depth and would prefer to take a punt in the draft.

[Pkbaldy]

Wrexham Give : Travis Colyer + N36

for

Winchester Give: N15

I know it's a deep draft, but at N15, I know who exactly to get at this pick. Colyer is a good forward, but with the year off, i don't know how he'll perform... N36 can still pick up a good smokey for Rusty.

Rusty to confirm

[Rusty00]

Wrexham Give : Travis Colyer + N36

for

Winchester Give: N15

I know it's a deep draft, but at N15, I know who exactly to get at this pick. Colyer is a good forward, but with the year off, i don't know how he'll perform... N36 can still pick up a good smokey for Rusty.

Rusty to confirm

Confirmed. Was after a bit more forward depth and like Colyer to provide that. Can hopefully snag a bargain at Pick 36.