Finals.. Trades

Started by Mark, July 31, 2016, 08:34:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

_wato

Dunno what trade would best suit my team.

Was always planning to get rid of Rich but last two weeks 113 & 115 so he's turning the tables, be of 30 odd and playing the crows who don't tag so he'll be fine to stay.

Then Titch/Shiel were the other two I wanted to upgrade but both averaging between 100-105 and both scoring OK, dunno if it's worth going to Neale for only 5-10 points more per game and risk losing points to my current two each week (as in Neale isn't lighting the world on fire and making it a must trade)

And then my fwds are killing it, so I don't have to upgrade there either. Could possibly turn Petracca -> Dahl and leave him as M10/F7 but is that trade really worth it? I'm more inclined to hold trades and reassess, because I'm more worried about resting in the weeks to come.

Shaw, Docherty, Simpson, Rance, Laird, Rich
Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Sloane, Hannebery, Ward, Shiel, Titch
Goldy, Gawn
Dusty, Merrett, Zorko, Joey, NRoo, Buddy

King_Robbo

I think you're in a good position wato.
Only one I'd consider is Dahl in and push buddy or Nroo to f7

vtaced


Wanderer


crowls

2 trades left, brought in Lycett last week to avoid donut.
Looking at Lids to Dahl/Greene just dont know it it is worth it given i can loophole Petracca and Lycett for F6.
McVeigh has been disappointing since i got him and now my D6 with Collins and joyce at d7/d8.
Have Hall, Matho and Pillips at Mid bench. 
Probably leaning towards Greene over Dahls atm.


Who is more consistent and with bigger cieling?


HappyDEZ

Quote from: crowls on August 01, 2016, 02:12:25 PM
2 trades left, brought in Lycett last week to avoid donut.
Looking at Lids to Dahl/Greene just dont know it it is worth it given i can loophole Petracca and Lycett for F6.
McVeigh has been disappointing since i got him and now my D6 with Collins and joyce at d7/d8.
Have Hall, Matho and Pillips at Mid bench. 
Probably leaning towards Greene over Dahls atm.


Who is more consistent and with bigger cieling?
IF you were to make a trade out of Greene & Dahl I would pick Dahl without a doubt. Reason being Dahl will have to spend more time in the mids with Wallis, Libba & McRae all out.

tommy10

If Boyd and Lids is back, then it's Petrecca to Dahl. If Lids out another week, then him to Merrett.

Ingram

Could trade Hall to Frank or Greene but if he's back this week I will hold onto my 3 trades left. I have Naismith to cover him if he's out for another. I really just don't have much faith in anyone in my price range :(

_wato

I've actually worked out a trade for this week I like.

Rich -> Bartel

Finally!!!!!! He's gone

enzedder

Quote from: _wato on August 01, 2016, 05:11:58 PM
I've actually worked out a trade for this week I like.

Rich -> Bartel

Finally!!!!!! He's gone
I'd prefer it if you went Danger > Ablett 8)

Blues Blues Blues

Is Titchell to Hanners a waste of a trade?

3 trades left, and still have Hall to deal with but Naismith filling in well at F6.

Missed top 4 so playing cut throat final, and opponent has Hanners.

Hall to Dahl and Titch to Hanners leaves 1 trade and a full team, with Collins cover in defense, Davis cover in Mids, Naismith cover ruck and fwd plus SOSOS.


shaker

Have to wait and see if Lids is playing if he is not might get Motlop that would give me enough cash to trade Libba to Hanners that would give me 5 Sydney players 3 in the Mids
If Lids is playing then I can unload Trengove or Menadue to free up some cash , my last 2 trades but it does not matter it has been a terrible year for me especially the last 3 weeks  :'(

tor01doc

Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 01, 2016, 07:07:49 PM
Is Titchell to Hanners a waste of a trade?

3 trades left, and still have Hall to deal with but Naismith filling in well at F6.

Missed top 4 so playing cut throat final, and opponent has Hanners.

Hall to Dahl and Titch to Hanners leaves 1 trade and a full team, with Collins cover in defense, Davis cover in Mids, Naismith cover ruck and fwd plus SOSOS.

Obviously wait for teams, but yes - a bit too sideways.

I see your dilemma but is there nowhere else you can use that trade?

Blues Blues Blues

Quote from: tor01doc on August 02, 2016, 01:25:03 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 01, 2016, 07:07:49 PM
Is Titchell to Hanners a waste of a trade?

3 trades left, and still have Hall to deal with but Naismith filling in well at F6.

Missed top 4 so playing cut throat final, and opponent has Hanners.

Hall to Dahl and Titch to Hanners leaves 1 trade and a full team, with Collins cover in defense, Davis cover in Mids, Naismith cover ruck and fwd plus SOSOS.

Obviously wait for teams, but yes - a bit too sideways.

I see your dilemma but is there nowhere else you can use that trade?

Pretty much have a full team once Hall upgraded. Although I don't have Zorko or Zerret in Fwds which also scares me. I could upgrade Hall to one of them but that would need 2 trades as don't have the cash :(

dmac07

Currently very stuck on what to do with my team. Am in knockout finals, have a full premium side, and enlugh trades to do whatever I like so would hate to go out with trades left.

Def - Shaw, Docherty, Simpson, Laird, Rance, McVeigh (Collins, Aliir)
Mid - Danger, Pendles, Treloar, Parker, Sloane, Ward, Priddis, Gray (Petracca, Stewert, Macpherson)

Ruck - Goldy,Gawn  (Grimley)

Fwd - Martin, Merrett, N Riewoldt, Franklin, Greene, Wells (S.Reid, S.Grimley)

I can do Petracca to Dahl in a single trade and switch fwd. Allows me to loophole 2 of N.Roo/Greene/Dahl.

Or I could use 2 trades, allowing me to get in any premium on any line. Could get Zorko instead of Dahl with two trades. Or Hannebery into the mids and loophole there.

Or could get rid of McVeigh to any other defender? Though cant loophole there as everyone is playing and dont want to use a trade just to gain loophole.

Thoughts on the best option or the best player to get in this week?