WXV Round 17: Missing Moscows' Final Showing

[ossie85]

I probs won't be on to provide a prompt live ladder after the SC scores are released for Freo/Syd :-X

You never told me you had a social life?

Far out can't believe our whole season is basically based on

BTB vs Jenkins :o

Hah!

[ossie85]

Jacobs injury bad? HUGE blow for Rio

[meow meow]

Fkn Conor McKenna. Playing in the back line for the 2nd half of the season, giving me ANOTHER defender next year.

[My Chumps]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

[GoLions]

Wait, do people think we were actually offering pick 2 for Hunter? :P

[Holz]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

i think purp should even take 1 2 3 for fyfe.

imagine Petracca,  Brayshaw, Henney
whitfield wines hogan

[My Chumps]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

i think purp should even take 1 2 3 for fyfe.

imagine Petracca,  Brayshaw, Henney
whitfield wines hogan

Or Boyd, Aish, Scharanberg. It goes both ways.

[RaisyDaisy]

New York all done for 1308. Mundy was HUGE!

Tokyo 1008 with Dempsey, Gleeson, Cameron, Atkins and HGA

So, we need all of that to be under 300

8 mins into the 3rd and those 4 guys are on just over 100. Hopefully they all continue to mega spud like they are

Fingers crossed

[Holz]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

i think purp should even take 1 2 3 for fyfe.

imagine Petracca,  Brayshaw, Henney
whitfield wines hogan

Or Boyd, Aish, Scharanberg. It goes both ways.

to be fair boyd aish where always bad picks. Shaz i would have taken but to be fair he has been injured and stars can get injured.

[Torpedo10]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

i think purp should even take 1 2 3 for fyfe.

imagine Petracca,  Brayshaw, Henney
whitfield wines hogan

Or Boyd, Aish, Scharanberg. It goes both ways.

We've barely seen Schaz, and what we did was pretty good.

[ossie85]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

i think purp should even take 1 2 3 for fyfe.

imagine Petracca,  Brayshaw, Henney
whitfield wines hogan

Or Boyd, Aish, Scharanberg. It goes both ways.

to be fair boyd aish where always bad picks. Shaz i would have taken but to be fair he has been injured and stars can get injured.

They weren't always bad picks. That's the benefit of hindsight

[Torpedo10]

Where is Alex when you need him for the National Draft stats?

[DazBurg]

so Eddie Betts has single handedly taken the Idol from PNL

[Holz]

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Haha, whilst I agree with most of what's been said I'd definitely be taking 1+2+3 for Hunter.

i think purp should even take 1 2 3 for fyfe.

imagine Petracca,  Brayshaw, Henney
whitfield wines hogan

Or Boyd, Aish, Scharanberg. It goes both ways.

to be fair boyd aish where always bad picks. Shaz i would have taken but to be fair he has been injured and stars can get injured.

They weren't always bad picks. That's the benefit of hindsight

Boyd never was its why scache fell to like pick 9. KPF are gambles even hogan who is a beast is taking time. Weits went pick 8 and KPD are less of a risk if they take intercept marks as weits does.

Aish is an outside mid something i would never draft early.

at the time i said they were bad picks.

people now draft much smarter as shown in last years drafting.

[RaisyDaisy]

Down to the wire stuff with bloody Cameron keeping Tokyo in it

One more quarter to go, and determine the 8