WXV Round 17: Missing Moscows' Final Showing

Started by Purple 77, July 26, 2016, 08:39:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

My Chumps


RaisyDaisy


Levi434


RaisyDaisy

Very nervous over here!

I'm trying to throw all sorts of curses, jinxes etc towards Tokyo's remaining players!  :-X

Torpedo10

Meanwhile Moscow are all on the bench waiting for 2017 to begin.  :'(

RaisyDaisy

Stephen Hill, you've been great all year - don't cost us the match now!

LIFT!!!

Nige

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 31, 2016, 05:56:45 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on July 31, 2016, 05:55:53 PM
Kennedy is a fkn boss tell ya what

Want our 1st round pick for him?  ;)
Given they won't accept Pick 2 for Lachie Hunter, good luck with that. :P

meow meow

Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

Jukes

Quote from: meow meow on July 31, 2016, 06:22:07 PM
Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

Holz

Quote from: Jukes on July 31, 2016, 06:24:21 PM
Quote from: meow meow on July 31, 2016, 06:22:07 PM
Why would they take 2 for Hunter? They might get a player who'll be depth quality for 2 years then have 10 seasons of being starting quality, if they're lucky. Or they could just keep already proven premo Hunter for the next decade. Tough choice.

That's what I was thinking, I wouldn't take 1+2+3 for a guy like Hunter. Picks are a gamble, while Hunter is a proven gun, never good business to overvalue picks in games like this (ofc in the real AFL they're a lot more valuable)

yeah so i totally disagree with that. Top picks are very very usefull. I can see why you wouldnt take 1 for Hunter even though i would take Brodie over hunter personally. if you didnt take 1 and 2 for hunter then your crazy.

never good business to undervalue picks in this game.

RaisyDaisy

I think it's best to use the early picks you get, try and pick some good kids who you can stay on your list long term and then reap the rewards once they hit their straps and turn into good players. It's an investment in your future

I wouldn't be giving up proven players for early picks

The key word being early (1st-early2nd round)

Holz

Quote from: Ricochet on July 31, 2016, 05:52:25 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on July 31, 2016, 05:51:35 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on July 31, 2016, 05:48:58 PM
Umm excuse me, Matt Crouch getting tagged?
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 31, 2016, 05:34:58 PM
Flower off
So he really is BTB?  :P
Even oppo coaches are starting to agree!

sometimes coaches realise guys cant be stopped. the real best guy on the crows is my boy sloaney. absolute beast after a slow start.

Adamant

Plus I offered Pick 3 for Hunter last year when he was a bit more of an unknown quantity, why would they trade him for Pick 2 after he's backed up last season with an even better one?

Purple 77

I probs won't be on to provide a prompt live ladder after the SC scores are released for Freo/Syd :-X

Ricochet

Far out can't believe our whole season is basically based on

BTB vs Jenkins :o