BXVs Rule Change Discussion Thread 2016/2017

[SydneyRox]

The other thing, is that like DPP it takes some investigation and research to pick the right players.

People will trade now thinking (or hoping) that someone is going to gain/retain/lose DPP next season

Not much different to changes during the year, which I think only affected like 40players this year?

[Rids]

I like the idea of making more players relevant throughout the season. UF are a lot stricter with the allocation of DPPs than AF as well. So only players who deserve it will get it eg Mills.

[nas]

I like the idea of making more players relevant throughout the season. UF are a lot stricter with the allocation of DPPs than AF as well. So only players who deserve it will get it eg Mills.

Steins are happy with this!

[Rusty00]

I assume that UF only add DPPs throughout the year and not take it away?

[iZander]

I assume that UF only add DPPs throughout the year and not take it away?

yep

[nas]

I assume that UF only add DPPs throughout the year and not take it away?

yep

Correct.
Players are reviewed after every three rounds to determine if they have been primarily playing in a position that they are not already eligible for in Ultimate Footy.
If this is the case, a player positional change may be made.
Check back after rounds 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 to see what changes have been made.
For full details and criteria used check the Position Changes help section.

[Rusty00]

I assume that UF only add DPPs throughout the year and not take it away?

yep

Correct.
Players are reviewed after every three rounds to determine if they have been primarily playing in a position that they are not already eligible for in Ultimate Footy.
If this is the case, a player positional change may be made.
Check back after rounds 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 to see what changes have been made.
For full details and criteria used check the Position Changes help section.

I suppose I could've looked that up myself :P

[T Dog]

Hedgies support any changes being made on UF being live.
Option 2

[Ringo]

All votes are now in -

We will be locking positions as at Rd 1 as we did this year. Voting was very tight with final count 9-7 in favour of retaining existing.

[kilbluff1985]

All votes are now in -

We will be locking positions as at Rd 1 as we did this year. Voting was very tight with final count 9-7 in favour of retaining existing.

boring

[GoLions]

All votes are now in -

We will be locking positions as at Rd 1 as we did this year. Voting was very tight with final count 9-7 in favour of retaining existing.

boring

Maybe you should have said something earlier then? :P (assuming you're implying it would have been better to have constantly changing positions)

[Pkbaldy]

Actually I regret my decision haha... The changes would of been kinda fun.

[kilbluff1985]

All votes are now in -

We will be locking positions as at Rd 1 as we did this year. Voting was very tight with final count 9-7 in favour of retaining existing.

boring

Maybe you should have said something earlier then? :P (assuming you're implying it would have been better to have constantly changing positions)

why posting wouldn't change the voting results

i'm not that fussed just think it would of been more fun

[nostradamus]

oh well there's always next time for those who now agree that it would be a good thing

[SydneyRox]

Actually I regret my decision haha... The changes would of been kinda fun.

RECOUNT!!  :-X :-X