2016/2017 Trade Discussions

Started by LF, July 25, 2016, 07:09:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

elephants

Replying for new replies!

Some interesting stuff in this thread already!

T Dog

El Paso trade room update.

Zac Merrett was originally marked as a keeper  He is now available for trade and under early discussion.

Bernie Vince; Ben Brown; Blake Acres; Adam Saad (discussion); ND Rd1; ND Rd2; are unofficially committed already.

Pkbaldy


kilbluff1985

only 7 guys not for sale

Callan Ward
Tom MItchell
Mitch Duncan
Chad Wingard

Luke Dahlhaus
Andrew Swallow
Hamish Hartlett
Nick Dal Santo
Liam Picken
Heath Shaw
Grant Birchall
Jack Newnes
Lachie Hunter
Matthew Broadbent
Will Minson
Billy Longer
Tom Hickey

Joe Daniher
Jay Schulz
Ben Howlett
Stewart Crameri
Clancee Pearce
Lewis Taylor
Travis Varcoe
Tom Bellchambers
Scott D. Thompson
Zach Tuohy
Aaron Black
Darcy Moore
Billy Hartung
Toby McLean
Mitchell Honeychurch
Brayden Maynard
Nick Graham
Ryan Schoenmakers
Dean Terlich
Jake Neade
Paul Stewart
James Harmes
Jake Batchelor
Teia Miles
Michael Apeness
Marcus Adams
Daniel Rioli
Mitch Brown
Corey Wagner
Mackenzie Willis
Ben Crocker
Conor McKenna
Alex Morgan
Jordan Snadden
Alex Woodward

elephants

Someone hit me up lets wheel and deal

Rids

Quote from: Atto on July 29, 2016, 12:16:33 PM
Quote from: R.Griffen on July 29, 2016, 12:01:04 PM
Probably a stupid question but is the cap of trade movements players going in or players going out?

Pretty sure it's out. So for example:

Team A is trading Player A and Player B
and
Team B is trading Player C

Then that would be 2 moves for Team A and 1 move for Team B.

We haven't had this problem before because beforehand it was always 1 for 1 or 2 for 2 trades etc., so it didn't matter then.



OK. So quick question about this as it doesnt make sense sorry.
In this scenario how does Team A on-trade?
Shoudnt it be 'trade in' = movment?

LF

Team A and B trade player X and player Y that's a movement each

Then Team B turns around trades player Y to team C counts as a movement for team C

It's the same as Euros where on trading has been happening for awhile

Rids

Quote from: LF on August 04, 2016, 02:24:45 PM
Team A and B trade player X and player Y that's a movement each

Then Team B turns around trades player Y to team C counts as a movement for team C

It's the same as Euros where on trading has been happening for awhile


That isnt the example Atto used sorry. And that is trade in is a movement not the player traded out.

Rids

Example:

Team A trades Player Bob
Team B trades Player Bill

Movement for Team B is Bob in.

Then Team B on trades Bob to another team.

Movement becomes 0.

The way Atto has described it is the opposite.

Movement for Team B is Bill who is now in Team A.
Team B cannot on trade Bill as they dont own him.

GoLions

In British it is:

I trade Player A to Rids (1 movement for me as I am trading a player out)
Rids trades me Player B (no movement for me as I am trading this player in)

I then trade Player B to LF (no movement for me as Player B wasn't in my team during the season)
LF trades me Player C (no movement for me as I am trading this player in)

Is this how it is working here as well?

Rids

Yeah not sure tbh. Sorry for the confusion but want to make sure I am doing the right thing here.

Atto

I'll use GL's example:

In the first step, both GL and Rids will use one movement each because they are both getting rid of a player that the coach had during the season.

In the second step, only LF will get a movement counted (assuming Player C is a player LF had during the season). GL won't get a movement counted for the stated reason.

I hope that clears it up. (I'm pretty sure that these are correct.)

kilbluff1985

i'm rather sick so not going to continue in any trade discussions for few days

if we're discussing a deal remind of the discussion on like Wednesday

R.Griffen

Anyone got draft picks I can make a play at?

kilbluff1985