WXV Official Trade Confabulation

Started by meow meow, July 13, 2016, 09:21:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

upthemaidens

Quote from: iZander on November 10, 2016, 01:29:06 AM
Quote from: upthemaidens on November 09, 2016, 10:59:52 PM
Tim Mohr has just signed for another 2 years with GWS.  Averages of 69.5 and 72.3 in the past, so could be a handy Defender for your Club.
    Will consider any offers, whether it's a player or draft pick.  Can package him up with something else, if need be.

Pnedles?
Sure, post it up and we'll confirm.

Holz

#1201
Quote from: meow meow on November 09, 2016, 10:50:34 PM
Even Dublin doesn't have a team above average in every position. Mine is

would have to be close.

Omac averaged 69 so like 0.5 away from the 72nd best defender.
Weits averaged 68 so 1 point below the 72nd best defender, but that was in his first year carrying an injury.

I  obviously smash it in the mids if 86.5 being the worst (mines like 105) and the average being 99+ mine would be pushing 110.

Ruck well well above average

My forward obviously beat the average and the 72nd best of 65. Well Daw beats that.

Both the utilities are top 72 (and the M7)

so

BAC: A, A. A, B+
MID: A, A, A, A
RUC: A
FOR: A, A, A, A
INT: A, A
CAPT: A

so while technically correct for last year, given the defender retirings alone I now have a whole sqaud of top 72s.

RaisyDaisy

What are using to justify your grading's of A,B etc?

Is it just A for above the position average and B for below?

Mundy, Gibson, TMac, Hurn
Lewis, Duncan, Scully, Arma
Tippett
JJK, Heeney, Menzel, Picken
Tyson, Grigg

How does that stack up? Is that A's all over except B for Captain?

meow meow

A for above average
B for below average

OMac is more than 10 points below average, he's on the cusp of being good enough to be a starter (a top 72 player)

RaisyDaisy

I think we're all A's

Just B for Captain  :'(

Holz

Quote from: meow meow on November 10, 2016, 01:56:31 PM
A for above average
B for below average

OMac is more than 10 points below average, he's on the cusp of being good enough to be a starter (a top 72 player)

ok misinterpreted you

so yeah my F4 and D4 are below average.

not sure anyone will ever have a whole team above average. Every team has some weakens.

that is unless Jack gets DPP and then Weits keeps going. Or a trade a super gun to fix up D4 F4.


meow meow

#1206
Scully below average
Armitage below average

Which is good. An even comp would have a mix of 2 above, 2 below in every position except ruck, and one each on the bench. Obviously it matters how far above or below the players are but it's still interesting.

Edit: Duncan below average too.

Holz

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on November 10, 2016, 02:01:16 PM
I think we're all A's

Just B for Captain  :'(

BAC: A, A, A, B
MID: B, B, B, B
RUC: A
FOR: A, A, A, B
INT: A,A
CAPT: F

so not all As.

GoLions

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on November 10, 2016, 02:01:16 PM
I think we're all A's

Just B for Captain  :'(
Isn't your entire midfield below avg from meow's numbers? (except maybe Lewis)

You'd be above the worst avg for each position though.

I think my only guys above average are JPK, Pittard, and Hawkins. But I'm ok with that considering the guys under include Mills, Prestia, Hunter, Miller, Blicavs, Blacres, Lmac, Collins who should all get better. Don't talk to me about rucks though :P

Also, looks like I'm above the worst avg in each position which is handy.

Levi434

Open to trading Sam Jacobs + any combo of the following:

Nat 19, Nat 29, Aaron Francis, Brayden Maynard, Jackson Ramsay, Taylor Hunt, Zaine Cordy, Ben McKay, Mitch Robinson, David Zaharakis, Danyle Pearce, Leiws Jetta, Jack Redpath, Cam Pedersen.

I'd be looking for a half-decent ruck in return. According to meow's stats they need to average over 70. So I'd be looking for just about a 75 ruck.

Mainly looking for mids.

meow meow

I'll be playing 2 worse than worst XV quality forwards next year.

Probably 4 since the 2 starting/above average forwards are Waite and Higgins.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Holz on November 10, 2016, 02:08:29 PM
BAC: A, A, A, B
MID: B, B, B, B
RUC: A
FOR: A, A, A, B
INT: A,A
CAPT: F

so not all As.

Pretty sure D4 (Hurn) and F4 (Picken) are A's?

Lewis would be right on A too, just

Don't mind having all those B's in the mids because their solid with upside

F Captain is harsh, but whatever



meow meow

Basically the whole point was that

81 ave Def
93 ave Mid (if we're going with 6)
87 ave Ruc
77 ave Fwd

are all worth roughly the same based on averages. The rucks are skewed due to the low amount and wild variation so disregard them, everyone knows they're worth more. Teams asking for a 85 average forward in exchange for their 95 average mid are slightly off, since their mid is just 2 above average while the forward is 8 above.

Vinny

iZander and I are finished exams so can get back to trading!

Hit us up if you want any of Pendles and friends.

iZander

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on November 10, 2016, 03:31:09 PM
Quote from: Holz on November 10, 2016, 02:08:29 PM
BAC: A, A, A, B
MID: B, B, B, B
RUC: A
FOR: A, A, A, B
INT: A,A
CAPT: F

so not all As.

Pretty sure D4 (Hurn) and F4 (Picken) are A's?

Lewis would be right on A too, just

Don't mind having all those B's in the mids because their solid with upside

F Captain is harsh, but whatever

There is literally 1 team with a worse captain option, for a team aiming for a flag your captain option is certainly an F :P