Round 15 Captain

Started by enzedder, June 26, 2016, 08:50:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

freddo81

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 01, 2016, 12:23:45 PM
I guess the temptation of Priddis vs Essendon was there, so I can't fault giving him the VC but when Ablett/Danger is the best combo going, and Danger isn't playing this round I just had to put the VC on GAJ first, and then have the fallback option if he doesn't produce

So hard to bank 122 because GAJ is capable of going huge, so giving him the VC avoids this dilemma

^this

shaker

After Zaha's pathetic score last night need to have a bit of a punt on VC tossing up between Parker and Lid's into Pendles

enzedder

Quote from: freddo81 on July 01, 2016, 12:30:30 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 01, 2016, 12:23:45 PM
I guess the temptation of Priddis vs Essendon was there, so I can't fault giving him the VC but when Ablett/Danger is the best combo going, and Danger isn't playing this round I just had to put the VC on GAJ first, and then have the fallback option if he doesn't produce

So hard to bank 122 because GAJ is capable of going huge, so giving him the VC avoids this dilemma

^this

Judd Magic

Quote from: Bully on July 01, 2016, 12:28:49 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 01, 2016, 12:23:45 PM
I guess the temptation of Priddis vs Essendon was there, so I can't fault giving him the VC but when Ablett/Danger is the best combo going, and Danger isn't playing this round I just had to put the VC on GAJ first, and then have the fallback option if he doesn't produce

So hard to bank 122 because GAJ is capable of going huge, so giving him the VC avoids this dilemma

Would have done the same but my weekend is booked solid, had to make a call Thursday or Friday (I also gave Dusty due consideration).

I would have gone Dusty vc over Priddis to be honest mate.

Don't be surprised if Dusty scores a 160 tonight.  :-X

Bully

Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2016, 04:20:01 PM
Quote from: Bully on July 01, 2016, 12:28:49 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 01, 2016, 12:23:45 PM
I guess the temptation of Priddis vs Essendon was there, so I can't fault giving him the VC but when Ablett/Danger is the best combo going, and Danger isn't playing this round I just had to put the VC on GAJ first, and then have the fallback option if he doesn't produce

So hard to bank 122 because GAJ is capable of going huge, so giving him the VC avoids this dilemma

Would have done the same but my weekend is booked solid, had to make a call Thursday or Friday (I also gave Dusty due consideration).

I would have gone Dusty vc over Priddis to be honest mate.

Don't be surprised if Dusty scores a 160 tonight.  :-X

He's in good form for sure, was a toss up.

Judd Magic

Quote from: Bully on July 01, 2016, 04:30:36 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2016, 04:20:01 PM
Quote from: Bully on July 01, 2016, 12:28:49 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 01, 2016, 12:23:45 PM
I guess the temptation of Priddis vs Essendon was there, so I can't fault giving him the VC but when Ablett/Danger is the best combo going, and Danger isn't playing this round I just had to put the VC on GAJ first, and then have the fallback option if he doesn't produce

So hard to bank 122 because GAJ is capable of going huge, so giving him the VC avoids this dilemma

Would have done the same but my weekend is booked solid, had to make a call Thursday or Friday (I also gave Dusty due consideration).

I would have gone Dusty vc over Priddis to be honest mate.

Don't be surprised if Dusty scores a 160 tonight.  :-X

He's in good form for sure, was a toss up.

True.

Love watching Dusty play, he's been in sizzling form lately.

I really am tempted to make him vc but ATM have Ablett vc and Pendles c. LOL!

_wato

Knowing Dusty he's probably due for a stinker.

Ringo

Quote from: Bully on July 01, 2016, 04:30:36 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2016, 04:20:01 PM
Quote from: Bully on July 01, 2016, 12:28:49 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 01, 2016, 12:23:45 PM
I guess the temptation of Priddis vs Essendon was there, so I can't fault giving him the VC but when Ablett/Danger is the best combo going, and Danger isn't playing this round I just had to put the VC on GAJ first, and then have the fallback option if he doesn't produce

So hard to bank 122 because GAJ is capable of going huge, so giving him the VC avoids this dilemma

Would have done the same but my weekend is booked solid, had to make a call Thursday or Friday (I also gave Dusty due consideration).

I would have gone Dusty vc over Priddis to be honest mate.

Don't be surprised if Dusty scores a 160 tonight.  :-X

He's in good form for sure, was a toss up.
Was a toss up both average 112 from the last 4 against Essendon and Port. Thought Priddas playing an undermanned Bombers would be better.  So just sitting to see what Gazza does to decide whether I need to move on Pendles who averages 141 against the Blues.

Judd Magic

Quote from: _wato on July 01, 2016, 05:30:18 PM
Knowing Dusty he's probably due for a stinker.

Hah!

Yeah that could also be the case mate.  :P

WizzFizz


freddo81

Hanners, Bont, Docherty, or Gawn??

_wato

Wanna go Sloaney boy cause he loves the Dees but he hates the MCG

So pendles to win it for the pies tonighttrt

Big Mac


WizzFizz

Pendles has gone 105+ every time hes gone under 100 since 2009

batt

Quote from: WizzFizz on July 02, 2016, 06:04:49 PM
Pendles has gone 105+ every time hes gone under 100 since 2009
so deserving of the Dependles nickname.