Round 14 Captain

Started by batt, June 20, 2016, 01:32:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions

T Dog

#30
June 22, 2016, 09:11:56 PM

_wato

#31
June 22, 2016, 09:35:07 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on June 22, 2016, 08:59:21 PM
Sloane against a battered and bruised North Melbourne into Danger for me

Hmmmm, Sloane does love North.

I remember his 180 a few years back. Could be an option for me.

AaronKirk

#32
June 23, 2016, 11:31:48 PM
Quote from: _wato on June 22, 2016, 09:35:07 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on June 22, 2016, 08:59:21 PM
Sloane against a battered and bruised North Melbourne into Danger for me

Hmmmm, Sloane does love North.

I remember his 180 a few years back. Could be an option for me.

He has delivered again v North. 141 pre-scaled. I will be locking that in.

Samm79

#33
June 23, 2016, 11:39:15 PM
Accidentally VC'd Sloane, wouldn't surprise if it scales to 150!

PICCOLLO

#34
June 23, 2016, 11:40:03 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on June 23, 2016, 11:31:48 PM
Quote from: _wato on June 22, 2016, 09:35:07 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on June 22, 2016, 08:59:21 PM
Sloane against a battered and bruised North Melbourne into Danger for me

Hmmmm, Sloane does love North.

I remember his 180 a few years back. Could be an option for me.

He has delivered again v North. 141 pre-scaled. I will be locking that in.

Great job. Couldnt do it with Danger playing the saints. He had to be VC.

Ricochet

#35
June 24, 2016, 10:23:36 AM
Finally got one right with Sloane VC :)

Now watch Danger go 180 again lol

Jimmykidd

#36
June 24, 2016, 11:08:11 AM
was tempted by libba > sloane. didnt end up doing it. kinda regret it now lol

still think hanners at sub 550 is the better option.

no eye deer

#37
June 24, 2016, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 24, 2016, 11:08:11 AM
was tempted by libba > sloane. didnt end up doing it. kinda regret it now lol

still think hanners at sub 550 is the better option.

Happy that I grabbed Sloan a few weeks ago when he bottomed out. Unhappy I left the VC off him. Pendles is tempting, now Ross said Barlow wouldn't be tagging this week, but I don't think he will go large enough for me to have the balls to take the C off Danger, so need a VC to go 140+. I'm thinking Heater.

Jimmykidd

#38
June 24, 2016, 11:43:04 AM Last Edit: June 24, 2016, 11:46:01 AM by Jimmykidd
Quote from: no eye deer on June 24, 2016, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 24, 2016, 11:08:11 AM
was tempted by libba > sloane. didnt end up doing it. kinda regret it now lol

still think hanners at sub 550 is the better option.

Happy that I grabbed Sloan a few weeks ago when he bottomed out. Unhappy I left the VC off him. Pendles is tempting, now Ross said Barlow wouldn't be tagging this week, but I don't think he will go large enough for me to have the balls to take the C off Danger, so need a VC to go 140+. I'm thinking Heater.

sloane is a gun. no doubt. he burnt me pretty hard last year though lol.

all of his monster scores have come at home. i think hes a great pick but yeah, he loves the oval.

dont have ablett? hes the perfect C this weekend IMO. Danger VC

no eye deer

#39
June 24, 2016, 11:56:38 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 24, 2016, 11:43:04 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on June 24, 2016, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 24, 2016, 11:08:11 AM
was tempted by libba > sloane. didnt end up doing it. kinda regret it now lol

still think hanners at sub 550 is the better option.

Happy that I grabbed Sloan a few weeks ago when he bottomed out. Unhappy I left the VC off him. Pendles is tempting, now Ross said Barlow wouldn't be tagging this week, but I don't think he will go large enough for me to have the balls to take the C off Danger, so need a VC to go 140+. I'm thinking Heater.

sloane is a gun. no doubt. he burnt me pretty hard last year though lol.

all of his monster scores have come at home. i think hes a great pick but yeah, he loves the oval.

dont have ablett? hes the perfect C this weekend IMO. Danger VC

Yeah got Gaz, he was my first choice. Just a bit worried, as the game is in Tazzie. Always nice to have Danger VC instead of C to take the worry out of it though.

timtim

#40
June 24, 2016, 01:42:12 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on June 24, 2016, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 24, 2016, 11:08:11 AM
was tempted by libba > sloane. didnt end up doing it. kinda regret it now lol

still think hanners at sub 550 is the better option.

Happy that I grabbed Sloan a few weeks ago when he bottomed out. Unhappy I left the VC off him. Pendles is tempting, now Ross said Barlow wouldn't be tagging this week, but I don't think he will go large enough for me to have the balls to take the C off Danger, so need a VC to go 140+. I'm thinking Heater.

How often does Ross Lyon tell the truth? haha

Barlow tag to Pendles for sure!

Keeper27

#41
June 24, 2016, 03:33:12 PM
Thoughts on Neale into Danger as pendles like to get tagged

jfitty

#42
June 24, 2016, 03:46:27 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on June 24, 2016, 03:33:12 PM
Thoughts on Neale into Danger as pendles like to get tagged

I'm going Neale into Danger, just for someone different!

LF

#43
June 24, 2016, 03:48:55 PM

timmyparso

#44
June 24, 2016, 03:49:37 PM
Quote from: timtim on June 24, 2016, 01:42:12 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on June 24, 2016, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 24, 2016, 11:08:11 AM
was tempted by libba > sloane. didnt end up doing it. kinda regret it now lol

still think hanners at sub 550 is the better option.

Happy that I grabbed Sloan a few weeks ago when he bottomed out. Unhappy I left the VC off him. Pendles is tempting, now Ross said Barlow wouldn't be tagging this week, but I don't think he will go large enough for me to have the balls to take the C off Danger, so need a VC to go 140+. I'm thinking Heater.

How often does Ross Lyon tell the truth? haha

Barlow tag to Pendles for sure!

Is peddles taggable? Or does Sidebottom get some attention?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions