Round 13 - Sydney v Melbourne Sunday 19th June 1:10 - SCG

Started by LF, June 16, 2016, 03:08:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

LF

LAST FIVE TIMES
R6, 2015, Sydney Swans 12.16 (88) d Melbourne 7.8 (50) at the MCG
R6, 2014, Sydney Swans 9.15 (69) d Melbourne 5.8 (38) at the MCG
R15, 2013, Sydney Swans 16.20 (116) d Melbourne 13.7 (85) at the MCG
R8, 2012, Sydney Swans 21.12 (138) d Melbourne 5.7 (37) at the SCG
R1, 2011, Melbourne 11.18 (84) drew Sydney Swans 11.18 (84) at the MCG

Big Mac

Probably have to predict another 3-4 goal loss here

SydneyRox

thinking we will have a point to prove here.

First time at the SCG for a while, predict a 125 v 88 win for the swans

Purple 77

Yeah. Playing at the SCG against the Swans on the rebound, and ourselves coming off a win (which we hate doing).

Apparently a wet forecast so hopefully that helps us contain the Sydney forward line and MAYBE restrict the losing margin.

fanTCfool

Swans running pretty low on defenders now, Dees a sneaky chance

Gigantor

AFL ‏@AFL  10m10 minutes ago
No late changes to either the @sydneyswans or @melbournefc for this afternoon’s clash. #AFLSwansDees

Mat0369

Petracca is so good. In traffic he just has this insane ability and to think he is technically in his first season after missing all of last year.

Torpedo10

Seems like Trengove is the one that got away.  :-\

Gigantor

These deliberate calls are getting a little ridiculous

Purple 77

Sydney just that little bit better atm  :-\ but can't fault our endeavour.

The efficiency going into the forward 50s is the difference

Purple 77

Actually, I take that back. The difference is the IMMENSE pressure by Sydney... I mean, we're doing OK in that regard, but 87 tackles in a half?! Really?!

Torpedo10

Gawn, you're acceptable at the moment. Lets lift that to EXTRAORDINARY.   :D

Mat0369

Quote from: Torpedo10 on June 19, 2016, 03:19:39 PM
Gawn, you're acceptable at the moment. Lets lift that to EXTRAORDINARY.   :D

No worries Blinky Bill

Ringo

My bringing in of Sinclair looks like it has bacfired.  Will give him the benefit of the wet though. Hopefully he passes my lowest scores of 35 (Dunkley) and 59 (Collins) to count in my best 18.  Have 20 playing and need every point I can without Danger as nominated c,

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Ringo on June 19, 2016, 03:45:18 PM
My bringing in of Sinclair looks like it has bacfired.  Will give him the benefit of the wet though. Hopefully he passes my lowest scores of 35 (Dunkley) and 59 (Collins) to count in my best 18.  Have 20 playing and need every point I can without Danger as nominated c,

So I can blame for you for jinxing him then :P

Bought him in 3 weeks ago for 81 and 90, and now this crap score when I actually need him on field  :'(