Round 12 Captain

[Bully]

Went Rocky as VC, a week too late by the looks of things. Hopefully Danger doesn't hit 200.  :P

[sammy123]

ha

Went Rocky as VC, a week too late by the looks of things. Hopefully Danger doesn't hit 200.  :P

same. had danger as VC all week. but past couple of times i had him he has let me down with tiny hundreds and a 98. look at him now

[whynot102]

Hoping Menadue is not a late in Danger VC

[Grufflez]

Hoping Menadue is not a late in Danger VC

+1 think we are ok but still showerting myself, forgot my other donuts are Freo/Ess  :o :o :o

[Gigantor]

Who would of thought you could be disappointed with 141 from your VC   :'( :'( :'(

[StuL]

Not even sure if I'll be able to loophole this week, as Goetz plays first game Saturday and I don't have any Hawks/Bombers players. Menadue only other possible non-player it seems, if he doesn't make the cut for the Tigs.

Rocky definitely VC or C though. Ablett or Pendles probably the other.

Goetz? Isn't he playing in Euro 2016?

[Slashers]

My Opponent had Danger VC and has elected to bench Petracca for Hall (FWD) and made Hall C.
However, they now have Petracca & Paine EMG (FWD) and Paine has already played for 0.
This is crazy right? Essentially elected to take a donut for Dangers score right? As you get the lowest of the 2 EMG scores which will be zero.
Am I right?
I'm not sure they have much to gain given I also have Dangers non C score and crack at captaining Hanners, Shiel, Shaw, Martin or GAJ.
Out of my four options, who would be the best??

[RaisyDaisy]

My Opponent had Danger VC and has elected to bench Petracca for Hall (FWD) and made Hall C.
However, they now have Petracca & Paine EMG (FWD) and Paine has already played for 0.
This is crazy right? Essentially elected to take a donut for Dangers score right? As you get the lowest of the 2 EMG scores which will be zero.
Am I right?
I'm not sure they have much to gain given I also have Dangers non C score and crack at captaining Hanners, Shiel, Shaw, Martin or GAJ.
Out of my four options, who would be the best??

Paine didn't play, so they still get Petracca's score

[Slashers]

My Opponent had Danger VC and has elected to bench Petracca for Hall (FWD) and made Hall C.
However, they now have Petracca & Paine EMG (FWD) and Paine has already played for 0.
This is crazy right? Essentially elected to take a donut for Dangers score right? As you get the lowest of the 2 EMG scores which will be zero.
Am I right?
I'm not sure they have much to gain given I also have Dangers non C score and crack at captaining Hanners, Shiel, Shaw, Martin or GAJ.
Out of my four options, who would be the best??

Paine didn't play, so they still get Petracca's score

Seriously? You sure? That doesn't seem right/fair.

[tkringle]

Worth taking Keays 23 instead of Josh Smith so I can get Dangers VC score?

[RaisyDaisy]

Worth taking Keays 23 instead of Josh Smith so I can get Dangers VC score?

Yep, because you might lose 40-50 points on that, but most likely gain close to 100 with Danger so should be 50ish better off

[Dudge]

Gaz will smash Dangers 2040400 or whatever  :o

[Grazz]

Went Rocky as VC, a week too late by the looks of things. Hopefully Danger doesn't hit 200.  :P

Hahahaha guess what.  ;)

[Slashers]

My Opponent had Danger VC and has elected to bench Petracca for Hall (FWD) and made Hall C.
However, they now have Petracca & Paine EMG (FWD) and Paine has already played for 0.
This is crazy right? Essentially elected to take a donut for Dangers score right? As you get the lowest of the 2 EMG scores which will be zero.
Am I right?
I'm not sure they have much to gain given I also have Dangers non C score and crack at captaining Hanners, Shiel, Shaw, Martin or GAJ.
Out of my four options, who would be the best??

Paine didn't play, so they still get Petracca's score

PFFFFT, WHATEVER....

The rules aren't clear in this description:
Emergency player scoring
•Selected emergencies will replace any non-starting player in matching positions only.
•Where there's more than one emergency available in a certain position and only one is required, the lowest scoring emergency will be used.
•If you have a 0 scoring player in a certain position and don't have an emergency selected in that position, you'll not score any points for that player..
•Players who are actually named and in the starting 22 for any match AND score a 0 for any reason, will NOT be replaced by an emergency. Their 0 score will also have an effect on their value, being recorded as having played a game.

HOWEVER, maybe is sort of eludes to that in this by-rule:
Q: If I have two emergencies selected in the same position who both score, which score is added to my team to replace a non-playing player?
A: The lowest scoring emergency is always used. Please note, emergencies that score greater than 0 are only used to replace the score of a non-playing player in your team.

But its still not clear. I hate these endless loophole options. I know of people that wont play in leagues that allow loopholes!!

[Grazz]

My Opponent had Danger VC and has elected to bench Petracca for Hall (FWD) and made Hall C.
However, they now have Petracca & Paine EMG (FWD) and Paine has already played for 0.
This is crazy right? Essentially elected to take a donut for Dangers score right? As you get the lowest of the 2 EMG scores which will be zero.
Am I right?
I'm not sure they have much to gain given I also have Dangers non C score and crack at captaining Hanners, Shiel, Shaw, Martin or GAJ.
Out of my four options, who would be the best??

Paine didn't play, so they still get Petracca's score

Seriously? You sure? That doesn't seem right/fair.

If Paine played and was say injured for 0 he'd cop the zero but because Paine didn't play his emergency will roll over to Petracca now.