Who is a must this week?

Started by dale93, May 30, 2016, 11:06:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:19:33 PM
Quote from: dale93 on May 30, 2016, 02:09:19 PM
What about sammy Mitchell?

NO.

5 round ave of 77 puts him outside TOP 100.

Can't see him as a top 10 - 12 (or top 20 for those who love to argue that you can't get top 10 - 12) mids

Danger / Hanners / GAJ / Pendles

then any of Neale, Gibbs, Parker, JPK, Treloar, Sidey, Ward, Coniglio, TMitch, Priddis, Steven, Shiel, Grigg etc etc.

Wingard at 415k makes loads more sense. 107 136 in last 2 and is 40k cheaper. Not only that but wingard could be a legit m9/f7 swingman.

PiPies

Quote from: Holz on May 30, 2016, 03:26:47 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:19:33 PM
Quote from: dale93 on May 30, 2016, 02:09:19 PM
What about sammy Mitchell?

NO.

5 round ave of 77 puts him outside TOP 100.

Can't see him as a top 10 - 12 (or top 20 for those who love to argue that you can't get top 10 - 12) mids

Danger / Hanners / GAJ / Pendles

then any of Neale, Gibbs, Parker, JPK, Treloar, Sidey, Ward, Coniglio, TMitch, Priddis, Steven, Shiel, Grigg etc etc.

Wingard at 415k makes loads more sense. 107 136 in last 2 and is 40k cheaper. Not only that but wingard could be a legit m9/f7 swingman.

Unfortunately Chad is just a forward this year, if he still had DPP he would be very tempting at that price.

dale93

Welcome to my team Robert Gray

tor01doc

Quote from: PiPies on May 30, 2016, 03:32:23 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 30, 2016, 03:26:47 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:19:33 PM
Quote from: dale93 on May 30, 2016, 02:09:19 PM
What about sammy Mitchell?

NO.

5 round ave of 77 puts him outside TOP 100.

Can't see him as a top 10 - 12 (or top 20 for those who love to argue that you can't get top 10 - 12) mids

Danger / Hanners / GAJ / Pendles

then any of Neale, Gibbs, Parker, JPK, Treloar, Sidey, Ward, Coniglio, TMitch, Priddis, Steven, Shiel, Grigg etc etc.

Wingard at 415k makes loads more sense. 107 136 in last 2 and is 40k cheaper. Not only that but wingard could be a legit m9/f7 swingman.

Unfortunately Chad is just a forward this year, if he still had DPP he would be very tempting at that price.

Does m9/f7 swingman mean you leave him at M8/M9 and move someone like Petracca from mid / fwd and have someone like say Gunstan / Rioli at F6/F7?

If not, then I don't get it.

Holz

Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:49:57 PM
Quote from: PiPies on May 30, 2016, 03:32:23 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 30, 2016, 03:26:47 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:19:33 PM
Quote from: dale93 on May 30, 2016, 02:09:19 PM
What about sammy Mitchell?

NO.

5 round ave of 77 puts him outside TOP 100.

Can't see him as a top 10 - 12 (or top 20 for those who love to argue that you can't get top 10 - 12) mids

Danger / Hanners / GAJ / Pendles

then any of Neale, Gibbs, Parker, JPK, Treloar, Sidey, Ward, Coniglio, TMitch, Priddis, Steven, Shiel, Grigg etc etc.

Wingard at 415k makes loads more sense. 107 136 in last 2 and is 40k cheaper. Not only that but wingard could be a legit m9/f7 swingman.

Unfortunately Chad is just a forward this year, if he still had DPP he would be very tempting at that price.

Does m9/f7 swingman mean you leave him at M8/M9 and move someone like Petracca from mid / fwd and have someone like say Gunstan / Rioli at F6/F7?

If not, then I don't get it.

Ok so I have wingard at f7 and then a guy like Petracca at m9. If i need a forward then I play wingard. If i need a mid then i just switch Dustin Martin into the mids and play wingard up front.

so basically he indirectly covers 2 lines. At the moment im doing that with kerridge at F6 and bennedy at F7 with petracca at M9. Bennedy to wingard would obvisouly be a big upgrade.

tor01doc

Quote from: Holz on May 30, 2016, 04:02:38 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:49:57 PM
Quote from: PiPies on May 30, 2016, 03:32:23 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 30, 2016, 03:26:47 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 30, 2016, 03:19:33 PM
Quote from: dale93 on May 30, 2016, 02:09:19 PM
What about sammy Mitchell?

NO.

5 round ave of 77 puts him outside TOP 100.

Can't see him as a top 10 - 12 (or top 20 for those who love to argue that you can't get top 10 - 12) mids

Danger / Hanners / GAJ / Pendles

then any of Neale, Gibbs, Parker, JPK, Treloar, Sidey, Ward, Coniglio, TMitch, Priddis, Steven, Shiel, Grigg etc etc.

Wingard at 415k makes loads more sense. 107 136 in last 2 and is 40k cheaper. Not only that but wingard could be a legit m9/f7 swingman.

Unfortunately Chad is just a forward this year, if he still had DPP he would be very tempting at that price.

Does m9/f7 swingman mean you leave him at M8/M9 and move someone like Petracca from mid / fwd and have someone like say Gunstan / Rioli at F6/F7?

If not, then I don't get it.

Ok so I have wingard at f7 and then a guy like Petracca at m9. If i need a forward then I play wingard. If i need a mid then i just switch Dustin Martin into the mids and play wingard up front.

so basically he indirectly covers 2 lines. At the moment im doing that with kerridge at F6 and bennedy at F7 with petracca at M9. Bennedy to wingard would obvisouly be a big upgrade.

That's what thought  ;) PiPies

PiPies

See what you mean now, just use the terminology different. In that scenario I would consider Petracca the swingman.

Bubbles

Will Dahlhaus get much cheaper than what he is at the moment? BE of 123 will score pretty close to that this week, really want to bring him in this week

Jimmykidd

Quote from: Bubbles on May 30, 2016, 05:00:01 PM
Will Dahlhaus get much cheaper than what he is at the moment? BE of 123 will score pretty close to that this week, really want to bring him in this week

a must have in the fwd line. he wont get a lot cheaper IMO. unless he has a stinker this weekend which is doubtful.

im grabbing him this week.

Holz

Quote from: Bubbles on May 30, 2016, 05:00:01 PM
Will Dahlhaus get much cheaper than what he is at the moment? BE of 123 will score pretty close to that this week, really want to bring him in this week

his average is 108 so if he puts that up he will fall under 5k. If you can afford him get him now, dont wait.

ronl

Been waiting for a chance to grab Dahl.  This week he's in.

colmullet

Gonna take a little bit of a punt and bypass Gray and Priddis and grab JPK, looks like he's found touch and is tailor made for SC in good form

tor01doc

Quote from: colmullet on May 30, 2016, 08:25:07 PM
Gonna take a little bit of a punt and bypass Gray and Priddis and grab JPK, looks like he's found touch and is tailor made for SC in good form

Like him but can chuck in stinkers...and I have Parker and prefer Hanners over JPK at this stage.

39, 58, 62, 72, 73 and 75 his lowest 10 in last 50 games, means around 1 in 10 games are stinky poo.

Good player for SC though as you say.

My Chumps

Quote from: colmullet on May 30, 2016, 08:25:07 PM
Gonna take a little bit of a punt and bypass Gray and Priddis and grab JPK, looks like he's found touch and is tailor made for SC in good form
Was so tempted to pick him up last week and kicked myself all through Friday night. Slipping hugely under the radar with Parker/Hanners getting attention.

I'm super tempted by McVeigh this week but something tells me 116 was a one-off. Hasn't looked the same so far this season.

no eye deer

Quote from: colmullet on May 30, 2016, 08:25:07 PM
Gonna take a little bit of a punt and bypass Gray and Priddis and grab JPK, looks like he's found touch and is tailor made for SC in good form
He'll break your heart when he goes to sleep against weaker sides. He's broke mine in the past.