Take Ruggles 59 or play Mitch Brown

[whynot102]

Opinions

[RaisyDaisy]

Scaled up to 60 :P

I'd probably play Brown

[Mat0369]

I'm taking Ruggles. The two times I haven't taken the 50-60 score I have ended up with McCarthy (injured for 14) and Brown (29).

[Bully]

I'm taking Ruggles. The two times I haven't taken the 50-60 score I have ended up with McCarthy (injured for 14) and Brown (29).

Yep, 60 for a rookie is what you want. Brown is high risk, could score 30 if he has a stinker.

[Grufflez]

id roll on Mitch Brown vs the Saints.

[Sabretooth Tigers]

id roll on Mitch Brown vs the Saints.

Absolutely.

[j959]

Brown was showere last week ... I read a dreamteam article and the author said he reckons he sux when he's the 2nd or 3rd tall option - ie he plays better when he's loose and can go for intercept marks ... so no Grimley or other tall target means the theory is Brown will struggle ...

I'm more conservative so i'd always take the 'points in the bank' - eg took Parker's 120 VC score yesterday rather than roll the dice on Danger today ... reckon the risk with Brown as others wrote above is that he tanks a sub 30 score ...

[Mat0369]

Brown has been playing forward though so he won't be intercept marking. People are reading too much into last week with the Saints. They have been pretty good for most of the season and Essendon are a pretty crappy team. Essendon will get smashed, Brown is averaging 59 for the season and best case scenario beats his average by 10 points? That means you're hoping he scores 70 which is 10 points more then Ruggles where he is more then likely to score the same or less. There is more risk then reward in this one.

[shaker]

I knocked back Ruggles score last week and copped the shower 29 from brown so I think you know my answer