What 'uniques' do you have your eye on?

Started by King_Robbo, May 21, 2016, 02:53:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

plumdog millionaire


Marcon


HotTiges

If Jack Steven could have more games like tonight..

jfitty

Coniglio.. Was going to get him in this week too.

He's in 0.8% of teams!! But might be a bit too expensive now.

fanTCfool

Also keen on Coniglio, though when he pulled up very sore after one contest I had my heart in my mouth!
Will be choosing between him, Pendles, Priddis and Neale this week - any pointers anyone?

jfitty

Quote from: fanTCfool on May 22, 2016, 10:26:24 PM
Also keen on Coniglio, though when he pulled up very sore after one contest I had my heart in my mouth!
Will be choosing between him, Pendles, Priddis and Neale this week - any pointers anyone?

I actually like Priddis the most out of those.. But Coniglio could be an awesome POD.

Missed round 1 with a hammy, so round 2 score was a bit low. Round 3 he started to find some form, but since then has been smashing it.

Deciding between him and Ward

tor01doc

Quote from: fanTCfool on May 22, 2016, 10:26:24 PM
Also keen on Coniglio, though when he pulled up very sore after one contest I had my heart in my mouth!
Will be choosing between him, Pendles, Priddis and Neale this week - any pointers anyone?

Am I missing something here?

Pendles, Pendles then Pendles.

3 round average 146.7

BE 89

Almost permacaptain again for me.

Grufflez

Quote from: tor01doc on May 22, 2016, 10:59:12 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 22, 2016, 10:26:24 PM
Also keen on Coniglio, though when he pulled up very sore after one contest I had my heart in my mouth!
Will be choosing between him, Pendles, Priddis and Neale this week - any pointers anyone?

Am I missing something here?

Pendles, Pendles then Pendles.

3 round average 146.7

BE 89

Almost permacaptain again for me.

Yes the 100k price difference.

tor01doc

Quote from: Grufflez on May 23, 2016, 12:09:07 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 22, 2016, 10:59:12 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 22, 2016, 10:26:24 PM
Also keen on Coniglio, though when he pulled up very sore after one contest I had my heart in my mouth!
Will be choosing between him, Pendles, Priddis and Neale this week - any pointers anyone?

Am I missing something here?

Pendles, Pendles then Pendles.

3 round average 146.7

BE 89

Almost permacaptain again for me.

Yes the 100k price difference.

It is only fantasy money. It isn't real.

Spendles on Pendles

Holz

you have to pick pendles.

Im serisouly looking at neale.

enzedder

Quote from: Holz on May 23, 2016, 02:54:06 PM
you have to pick pendles.

Im serisouly looking at neale.
Neales numbers have been unbelievable. If you can afford it I would seriously consider it. No Fyfe... No heaps of others... Can't see his numbers falling. Good luck mate. Would be a lot of fun in your position, but a fair amount of stress too... Every decision counts.

tor01doc

Quote from: Holz on May 23, 2016, 02:54:06 PM
you have to pick pendles.

Im serisouly looking at neale.

I'd look at Neale but I have some Zorko to get on my forko.

Grufflez

Neale is a good pick but at near 600k now he is batting with the big boys.

Grufflez

Surely some people are looking @ a 380k Chad Wingard?

How much less delivery is he going to get though with Port getting Smashed in the ruck all year?

And is it even worth considering if (like most) we already have Wells and Kerridge doing about the same as
you would hope for from Wingard?

Could be a handy F6/7 combo though of Wells & Wingard!

Holz

Quote from: Grufflez on May 23, 2016, 04:30:55 PM
Surely some people are looking @ a 380k Chad Wingard?

How much less delivery is he going to get though with Port getting Smashed in the ruck all year?

And is it even worth considering if (like most) we already have Wells and Kerridge doing about the same as
you would hope for from Wingard?

Could be a handy F6/7 combo though of Wells & Wingard!

what you said I have Kennedy Petracca matching him with dpp and then Wells Kerrdige beating him. Might as well just keep kennedy. Gunny is 100k more but far better.