What 'uniques' do you have your eye on?

[NBudicin]

The Rabbit  ;)

Still only in 0.8% of teams

[GoLions]

Mundy?

Yep Mundy for me, also Treloar has looked good lately. Everyone else is fairly cookie cutter (e.g. Dahl, Dusty, Simmo, Gray)

[dylanclements]

Already got Lids, who's in 2.2% of teams. Keeping a very close eye on Mundy in 0.6% and JPK in 3.9%.

[Grufflez]

I looked in to Tmac during the week and decided against it, trawling back through his numbers last year
and remembering how well champion data scored Tmac and Rance last season i honestly couldn't figure out
how he actually scored some of those 120's from the stats he had with 16 disposals.
Looking at last weeks game where he racked up 25 disposals 1 goal ect ect and comparing those stats to games played
last season a 99 sc scored seemed really weak, last year he would have got the 120 for that game easily.
So my theory is even if he finds that super confidence again (as he is a confidence player) he won't be rewarded as handsomely this season.

[Grufflez]

And no uniques just looking at both the port boys this week, Gray & Wingard.
Will all depend if i need Hopper or wait for Mathaison.

[Sabretooth Tigers]

You can have them and rocky won't be unique as a lot of people will pick him but stay away from my man Cripps! Had him from the start does seem to get ripped off by sc though compared to a golden child like Parker!

I've had Cripps (Carl) since Rd.1 also, particularly because of Carltons last 4 games. Have Docherty as well and will get 1 more in form blue just before SC finals. POD's maybe J Howe at Collingwood, and Zaharakis maybe as M9. If my team ever becomes healthy enough for that. With 18 trades left need 5 more prems. 1 forward and 4 defenders. Cheers and best of luck mate. And I don't barrack for the Blues.       :) ;)

[King_Robbo]

I looked in to Tmac during the week and decided against it, trawling back through his numbers last year
and remembering how well champion data scored Tmac and Rance last season i honestly couldn't figure out
how he actually scored some of those 120's from the stats he had with 16 disposals.
Looking at last weeks game where he racked up 25 disposals 1 goal ect ect and comparing those stats to games played
last season a 99 sc scored seemed really weak, last year he would have got the 120 for that game easily.
So my theory is even if he finds that super confidence again (as he is a confidence player) he won't be rewarded as handsomely this season.

He'll only get 'rewarded' if he deserves the points.. I don't really understand the logic here...
Last year he was intercept marking, contested marking and his disposal efficiency was a lot higher.. This year he's been horribly out if form but watching the game last week he looked like he was regaining some touch

[dmac07]

Traded in Neale this week... then all the carnage hit and reversed trades to deal with it :(

[Holz]

Traded in Neale this week... then all the carnage hit and reversed trades to deal with it :(

Seriuosly looking at neale but reckom ill cave and go pridda

[dmac07]

Traded in Neale this week... then all the carnage hit and reversed trades to deal with it :(

Seriuosly looking at neale but reckom ill cave and go pridda

I got Priddis last week which I'm pretty happy with, 2 good games for me.

I'll be looking at 2 out of Selwood, Ward, Neale, Hanneberry to finish the midfield. Might have to skip Neale with his price on the raise and Selwood looking like he will be a good price to get in a few weeks.

[fanTCfool]

A forward who shares a name with another forward has me tempted  :)

[enzedder]

Lachie is the only one I'm considering that would be a unique but if and when I get him he probably won't be. :P

[plumdog millionaire]

Anyone for Brad Mckenzie?

[Judd Magic]

Anyone for Brad Mckenzie?

Who?

[Bones Bombers]

Tippett at F6

Eventually Goldy or NicNat are going to miss a game I would think, so having that ruck cover will be important and he's scoring well enough for F6

Not a top 6 forward, but worth having because of the cover he provides and is capable of scoring well

Exactly my thoughts. Even if he scores a 65 as cover for a ruck, his comparative average worth to my team would increase 5 points, and a 130 would make that 10 points. Would also alleviate the ongoing worry that a ruck may miss.

Done deal next week. His price should be around $504k, so I think it's just on what he's probably worth anyways

I have considered something like this. Still deciding.
You could still end up with a donut if the Ruck is a late out and you can't make the Ruck/Forward switch. Have you guys looked into the timing of the games for all involved?