What 'uniques' do you have your eye on?

Started by King_Robbo, May 21, 2016, 02:53:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

King_Robbo

I know that people might not want to show their cards on this topic, as after all if you let the fanfooty community in on your little secret your 'unique' might not be so unique anymore..
However none the less I'm interested to know people's thoughts here..
I'm liking a few players, all whom have dropped in price since the start of the year, have big upside and thus represent great value.

Here are my top three

T.McDonald (Melb) $372k - has been really poor to start the season but his 99 last week could be the start of something. Showed his SC ability last year when he started off on fire and ended up a very respectable 95. His intercept marking is the key, so I'll be looking to see an improvement in this area before I pull the trigger

Rockliff (BL) 463k - dare we even think about him again? Has burnt so many coaches and trades in the process over the past couple of years. But point being, he is a fantasy beast when fully fit. Personally I think the lions have a horrible team which generally means more points for the cream of the crop. A sideways trade for say Libba could be the difference in top 1,000 or top 100

Wingard (Port) 370k - has shown in the past that he can get on a roll, especially when used as a high half forward. Knocked himself out early this year which has killed his average and shifted his price south a whopping $157k since Rd 1. He's too good a player to ignore.

Others are Suckling, KK, Bontempelli and Cripps

Over to you gents

ants

You can have them and rocky won't be unique as a lot of people will pick him but stay away from my man Cripps! Had him from the start does seem to get ripped off by sc though compared to a golden child like Parker!

RaisyDaisy

Tippett at F6

Eventually Goldy or NicNat are going to miss a game I would think, so having that ruck cover will be important and he's scoring well enough for F6

Not a top 6 forward, but worth having because of the cover he provides and is capable of scoring well

js19

#3
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 21, 2016, 08:51:05 AM
Tippett at F6

Eventually Goldy or NicNat are going to miss a game I would think, so having that ruck cover will be important and he's scoring well enough for F6

Not a top 6 forward, but worth having because of the cover he provides and is capable of scoring well

Exactly my thoughts. Even if he scores a 65 as cover for a ruck, his comparative average worth to my team would increase 5 points, and a 130 would make that 10 points. Would also alleviate the ongoing worry that a ruck may miss.

Done deal next week. His price should be around $504k, so I think it's just on what he's probably worth anyways

justaverage

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 21, 2016, 08:51:05 AM
Tippett at F6

Eventually Goldy or NicNat are going to miss a game I would think, so having that ruck cover will be important and he's scoring well enough for F6

Not a top 6 forward, but worth having because of the cover he provides and is capable of scoring well

Had him as R2 since round 1, is starting to pay dividends and this week moved him to forwards to pick up Goldy at $140k cheaper than the start of the year.

frenzy


dmac07

Neale. Though have a feeling a few may start to jump on.

Ringo

Quote from: js19 on May 21, 2016, 08:58:58 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 21, 2016, 08:51:05 AM
Tippett at F6

Eventually Goldy or NicNat are going to miss a game I would think, so having that ruck cover will be important and he's scoring well enough for F6

Not a top 6 forward, but worth having because of the cover he provides and is capable of scoring well

Exactly my thoughts. Even if he scores a 65 as cover for a ruck, his comparative average worth to my team would increase 5 points, and a 130 would make that 10 points. Would also alleviate the ongoing worry that a ruck may miss.

Done deal next week. His price should be around $504k, so I think it's just on what he's probably worth anyways
Exactly - DeGoey or Barlow to Tippett next week extremely tempting for the reasons stated.  Pity he went so well last night as his price will rise.  Have had him on my radar for about 4 weeks but the carnage keeps interfering.

PICCOLLO


Nige

Quote from: PICCOLLO on May 21, 2016, 10:19:09 AM
Quote from: frenzy on May 21, 2016, 09:59:22 AM
Zac Williams

shhh.

next year
Haha exactly this.

Quote from: dmac07 on May 21, 2016, 10:09:28 AM
Neale. Though have a feeling a few may start to jump on.
Agree here too.

I've got some interest in Nroo and Lids, not the most unique but they're not the among the first choices for most as far as I know.

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: Ringo on May 21, 2016, 10:17:45 AM
Quote from: js19 on May 21, 2016, 08:58:58 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 21, 2016, 08:51:05 AM
Tippett at F6

Eventually Goldy or NicNat are going to miss a game I would think, so having that ruck cover will be important and he's scoring well enough for F6

Not a top 6 forward, but worth having because of the cover he provides and is capable of scoring well

Exactly my thoughts. Even if he scores a 65 as cover for a ruck, his comparative average worth to my team would increase 5 points, and a 130 would make that 10 points. Would also alleviate the ongoing worry that a ruck may miss.

Done deal next week. His price should be around $504k, so I think it's just on what he's probably worth anyways
Exactly - DeGoey or Barlow to Tippett next week extremely tempting for the reasons stated.  Pity he went so well last night as his price will rise.  Have had him on my radar for about 4 weeks but the carnage keeps interfering.

Got him for barlow last week  8)

batt

I want Zac Williams but his bye is doing me no favours.  The centre bounce attendances got me interested.

I will have a firm eye on Trengove since I'm bringing him in.

Heeney maybe?  In super form.

Gandalf123


dale93


tttt