Round 8 Captain

Started by tommy10, May 08, 2016, 11:14:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

HotTiges

Quote from: Grazz on May 14, 2016, 01:07:29 AM
Yeh keeping Dangers score, happy to get a VC right for a change.
Yep agree..especially when it comes off on a Friday night!

RoughRed

Quote from: ants on May 14, 2016, 12:05:40 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on May 14, 2016, 12:02:06 AM
So danger 133 VC
Do you take it or roll
Parker ???
Sidebottom??
take it its over 130!
Thanks All for the input
Have not used the loophole before  ::)
Grimley on field C. Gawn to Emergency  :D

LordSneeze

So goldy vs Essendon after being named on the bench or Mitchell vs Freo
Into the ever reliable Zorko.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: LordSneeze on May 14, 2016, 02:06:45 PM
So goldy vs Essendon after being named on the bench or Mitchell vs Freo
Into the ever reliable Zorko.

Mitchell

I reckon Daw comes in so Goldy can take it a little easy today

Jesty

Might take the VC off Goldy to GAJ into Pendles for me.

LordSneeze

Decision made. Mitchell it is into Zorko.
Goldy's form and the fact he is startin on the bench is just too big a question mark when you have other options.

Mitchell really should have a field day.

LaHug

Anyone considering Nic Nat? 10 straight tons at Subi, 7 of them 130+, and Saints have given up 90+ to most rucks in recent weeks despite disappointing performances from them. If Nic Nat actually gets contested ball and/or good disposal efficiency (what held Goldy to just under 100), he should be 130+

Also, mainly because yolo and I just don't trust Pendles/Goldy

GoLions

Quote from: LaHug on May 14, 2016, 02:35:03 PM
Anyone considering Nic Nat? 10 straight tons at Subi, 7 of them 130+, and Saints have given up 90+ to most rucks in recent weeks despite disappointing performances from them. If Nic Nat actually gets contested ball and/or good disposal efficiency (what held Goldy to just under 100), he should be 130+

Also, mainly because yolo and I just don't trust Pendles/Goldy
I'm a bit tempted, NicNat has been much better than I thought after looking at his scores the other day. I'll see how my VC goes and make a decision after that. One of Boyd/NicNat will be my C though if VC fails.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: LaHug on May 14, 2016, 02:35:03 PM
Anyone considering Nic Nat? 10 straight tons at Subi, 7 of them 130+, and Saints have given up 90+ to most rucks in recent weeks despite disappointing performances from them. If Nic Nat actually gets contested ball and/or good disposal efficiency (what held Goldy to just under 100), he should be 130+

Also, mainly because yolo and I just don't trust Pendles/Goldy

It's a ballsy pick

Hickey doesn't often let op rucks go big vs him too

LaHug

Yeah... I'm also thinking about Heath Shaw. I might just go Nic Nat because I've fallen so much in the last few weeks anyway (everyone I brought in got injured) that I'm now well out of contention.

Torpedo10

No one taking Dangers 132?

LF

I stuck the VC on Heater because why not

GoLions

Quote from: Torpedo10 on May 14, 2016, 05:41:30 PM
No one taking Dangers 132?
Like 10000 people have already said they're taking Danger as VC :P

The rest of us commenting now didn't give him the VC haha

Torpedo10

Quote from: LF on May 14, 2016, 05:41:50 PM
I stuck the VC on Heater because why not
Looking a good move right now, he's absolutely seagulling the back 50

backpocket

Gawn or hannes captain?