Main Menu

Random Theoretical Question to Freo Fans

Started by Holz, May 05, 2016, 01:17:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GoLions


Toga

Quote from: elephants on May 16, 2017, 01:37:12 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:34:52 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 16, 2017, 01:24:31 PM
Kelly is clearly better than Fyfe now. The benefits of Leon playing the kids.

Settle down - Fyfe is returning from a broken leg.  I don't see a Brownlow medal around Kelly's neck

Hook, line and sinker

Every time ???

Holz

Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.


Ricochet

Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

Nige

Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome
I can see it.

Holz

Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality


Ricochet

Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality
Lang??

And way to early to call SPS vs Logue. Come talk to me in 3 years

Logue is also a WA boy and we reaaaally needed a key defender. Going into the draft there was a heap of talk over here that he could even go top 3-5
He is big, strong and has a massive tank. He could be anything

Nige

Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:25:47 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality
Lang??

And way to early to call SPS vs Logue. Come talk to me in 3 years

Logue is also a WA boy and we reaaaally needed a key defender. Going into the draft there was a heap of talk over here that he could even go top 3-5
He is big, strong and has a massive tank. He could be anything
Excuse you. The ill mind of Holz (and his constant craving too never be wrong about anything ever) >>>> reality.

GoLions

Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:25:47 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality
Lang??

And way to early to call SPS vs Logue. Come talk to me in 3 years

Logue is also a WA boy and we reaaaally needed a key defender. Going into the draft there was a heap of talk over here that he could even go top 3-5
He is big, strong and has a massive tank. He could be anything
Yeah in the deal between GWS and Freo, you also get Lang because he just felt like he didn't belong at the Cats and the Cats get to not have to pay Lang anymore.

Tbh I don't know why you guys would want Hopper and SPS and all them though. They'd never get a game under Ross.

Ricochet

Quote from: GoLions on May 19, 2017, 12:34:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:25:47 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality
Lang??

And way to early to call SPS vs Logue. Come talk to me in 3 years

Logue is also a WA boy and we reaaaally needed a key defender. Going into the draft there was a heap of talk over here that he could even go top 3-5
He is big, strong and has a massive tank. He could be anything
Yeah in the deal between GWS and Freo, you also get Lang because he just felt like he didn't belong at the Cats and the Cats get to not have to pay Lang anymore.

Tbh I don't know why you guys would want Hopper and SPS and all them though. They'd never get a game under Ross.
Exactly! Maybe in 5-8 years time, but they'd be no chance now

Nige

Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:37:20 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 19, 2017, 12:34:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:25:47 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality
Lang??

And way to early to call SPS vs Logue. Come talk to me in 3 years

Logue is also a WA boy and we reaaaally needed a key defender. Going into the draft there was a heap of talk over here that he could even go top 3-5
He is big, strong and has a massive tank. He could be anything
Yeah in the deal between GWS and Freo, you also get Lang because he just felt like he didn't belong at the Cats and the Cats get to not have to pay Lang anymore.

Tbh I don't know why you guys would want Hopper and SPS and all them though. They'd never get a game under Ross.
Exactly! Maybe in 5-8 years time, but they'd be no chance now
Are we sure Lang wouldn't move across the country despite currently being an hour away from home?

Holz

Quote from: Nige on May 19, 2017, 12:30:22 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:25:47 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on May 19, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 12:05:57 PM
Quote from: valkorum on May 16, 2017, 01:21:05 PM
Still wouldnt take the deal because Kelly and Hopper would both probably want to go home after a few years.  And like I said, we got McCarthy for nothing anyway.

Mccarthy cost you Glugg or SPS. (But got Lang and Logue)

SPS is a WA boy too.
Yeh you're right, Clugg or SPS out of the square at FF would have been awesome

my trade was McCarthy Kelly and Hopper for Fyfe.

so you get McCarthy regardless.

basically


do you prefer

McCarthy  with Fyfe Lang Logue

or

McCarthy  with Kelly Hopper SPS




Kelly < Fyfe
Hopper >>> Lang
SPS >> Logue

summary Holz trade >>>> reality
Lang??

And way to early to call SPS vs Logue. Come talk to me in 3 years

Logue is also a WA boy and we reaaaally needed a key defender. Going into the draft there was a heap of talk over here that he could even go top 3-5
He is big, strong and has a massive tank. He could be anything
Excuse you. The ill mind of Holz (and his constant craving too never be wrong about anything ever) >>>> reality.

Im often wrong.

Goldy over Witts to start this year
Thinking Neale would regress
I didnt think Kelly was this good, I actually assumed that Hopper would be the guy who delivered more then people expected.

I just like to think im correct more then im incorrect.

nobody gets it right every time, if not they would win SC every year by 2000 points.

I just think you take advantage of opportunity and GWS has too many players so you can probably get a package cheap as they cant play them all and fit all under cap.

The same way because they had academy picks teams could move up the draft cheap as 20 + 50 + 55 was worth more points then say pick 14

even though i think 14 is worth much more then all that.


Adamant

Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 01:29:01 PM
Im often wrong.

Goldy over Witts to start this year
Thinking Neale would regress
I didnt think Kelly was this good, I actually assumed that Hopper would be the guy who delivered more then people expected.

Ebert is an 80 average winger.

Ricochet

Quote from: Adamant on May 19, 2017, 02:04:51 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 19, 2017, 01:29:01 PM
Im often wrong.

Goldy over Witts to start this year
Thinking Neale would regress
I didnt think Kelly was this good, I actually assumed that Hopper would be the guy who delivered more then people expected.

Ebert is an 80 average winger.
Brad is better than Matt

SydneyRox

If i had a half empty bag of chips, would you trade it for Bennell?