Round 5 Captain

Started by RaisyDaisy, April 18, 2016, 09:45:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

batt


Holz

who is everyone loop hole if they are going danger.

i have goetz so Hanners/Goldy/Ablett into Danger

thinking hanners into Goldy/Ablett for safety.

think hanners will post 120 and ill lock that safety in.

Gandalf123

danger going big one week and not so much the other, on that basis, this one should be a big week, Danger into Fyfe.

yorgis

Gaz scored 109 in SC last week, not exactlly Captain material. Still reckon he was protecting his shoulder, and i'm just concerned that he may again next week. He does'nt like to play unless he's almost 100%. Just a tad worried about him

Thewizz71

Quote from: yorgis on April 20, 2016, 08:21:56 PM
Gaz scored 109 in SC last week, not exactlly Captain material. Still reckon he was protecting his shoulder, and i'm just concerned that he may again next week. He does'nt like to play unless he's almost 100%. Just a tad worried about him
That's why he's a great VC choice.

Holz

north have given up the least 100+ Dt scores

wouldnt go near Gaz and i think hall will go small.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2016, 01:38:38 PM
north have given up the least 100+ Dt scores

wouldnt go near Gaz and i think hall will go small.

I see you regularly bringing up DT scores here for comparison

No offense, but who gives a shower? They are completely different scoring systems

Sorry, just don't see how DT numbers are of any use for a SC based game

Ricochet

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 21, 2016, 01:43:50 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2016, 01:38:38 PM
north have given up the least 100+ Dt scores

wouldnt go near Gaz and i think hall will go small.

I see you regularly bringing up DT scores here for comparison

No offense, but who gives a shower? They are completely different scoring systems

Sorry, just don't see how DT numbers are of any use for a SC based game
They can still be used to compare. DT is basic raw stats, no influence or scaling.
Can certainly considered when predicting output of players

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Ricochet on April 21, 2016, 01:45:57 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 21, 2016, 01:43:50 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2016, 01:38:38 PM
north have given up the least 100+ Dt scores

wouldnt go near Gaz and i think hall will go small.

I see you regularly bringing up DT scores here for comparison

No offense, but who gives a shower? They are completely different scoring systems

Sorry, just don't see how DT numbers are of any use for a SC based game
They can still be used to compare. DT is basic raw stats, no influence or scaling.
Can certainly considered when predicting output of players

Yes you can compare, but it's apples and oranges and I just don't see how any comparison that could be made would be of any real relevance

Anyway, don't need to get into a whole thing about it :)

Back on topic!  :D

jfitty

Might put the big 'C' on Goldy this week, possibly try the loophole on Laird Friday night.

Last year he smashed Nicholls, even though North lost, so hopefully he can go 130+ this week

Ricochet

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 21, 2016, 01:48:47 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 21, 2016, 01:45:57 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 21, 2016, 01:43:50 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2016, 01:38:38 PM
north have given up the least 100+ Dt scores

wouldnt go near Gaz and i think hall will go small.

I see you regularly bringing up DT scores here for comparison

No offense, but who gives a shower? They are completely different scoring systems

Sorry, just don't see how DT numbers are of any use for a SC based game
They can still be used to compare. DT is basic raw stats, no influence or scaling.
Can certainly considered when predicting output of players

Yes you can compare, but it's apples and oranges and I just don't see how any comparison that could be made would be of any real relevance
No, no it doesn't.

If the statement was "North give up the least 25+ Possession games to players this year" do you consider it??
Of course you do

Its the same thing. Basic output. Has to be considered

Jimmykidd

cox named. no loophole option now.

Fyfe captain i think

Gigantor

First world SC problems, "Too many of my bench rookies are named so now I don't have a good VC loophole"

If Grimely gets named Mitch McGovern will be my only VC option  :P

Judd Magic

Quote from: Gigantor on April 21, 2016, 09:33:12 PM
First world SC problems, "Too many of my bench rookies are named so now I don't have a good VC loophole"

If Grimely gets named Mitch McGovern will be my only VC option  :P

Mitch McGovern is playing.  ;)

Gigantor

Quote from: Gigantor on April 21, 2016, 09:33:12 PM
First world SC problems, "Too many of my bench rookies are named so now I don't have a good VC loophole"

If Grimely gets named Mitch McGovern will be my only VC option  :P

Disregard :P I'm an idiot, thought the GC-NM game was at 2:10 not 4:35, can go Parker or NicNat as long as I'm in before the next game