Make a Big Call - Weekly Edition

[dmac07]

GWS beates Sydney by 30+ points.
JJ scores less than 60 in SC v hawks, (after everyone brings him in)
Fyfe and Dangerfield combine for less than 200SC
Saints beat Pies by 50+ points.

I fixed it for you :)

Taking my bat and ball and going home  >:(

[Samsturmfels]

Would love Danger to score low tomorrow

[Gigantor]

Would love Danger to score low tomorrow

Shut up!, I can't loophole GAJ so Danger is my captain

[Grufflez]

Would love Danger to score low tomorrow

Shut up!, I can't loophole GAJ so Danger is my captain

At least i am not the only noob.
My loophole was the Freo ueber unawesome   :-[

Who cares though i am going all in on Blicavs for captain!

[Grufflez]

Barlow to ton up ::)

99 isn't a ton buddy  ;D

[Asparagus]

Collingwood to play in a manner which makes it look like Buckley can coach. Massive call.

As Elaine said to Costanza....

Stick to the opposite!!

[essendon2]

Barlow to ton up ::)

99 isn't a ton buddy  ;D

who would've thought I'd still have a reason to dislike him after scoring 99 >:( :P

[fanTCfool]

If there is enough interest, I would be happy to now begin this proposed game, though interest has been minimal.
Feel free to submit entries for this weekend now, all the rules should be outlined in the OP. Please ask if anything remains unclear.
If there are 8 or more submissions, the scoring and competition will commence.

[SydneyRox]

Swans to beat Eagles by 60+

[BomberSam]

Mitch McGovern will score 80+ SC points against Hawthorn.
Goldy will get 50+ hitouts against Gold Coast.
Hawkins will kick 5+ goals against Port Adelaide.

[Grufflez]

I like this idea but from a managing point of view you might be better off taking 2 maybe 3 calls from each person, 5 or 8 will be a nightmareto keep track off if interest picks up. In addition the problem i can see with having so many calls per person is that most of them a likely to be wrong so we may well all end up with negative point scores lol anyway thanks for starting this thread and here goes.

P.S on second thought maybe easier to just mark points on how many ever calls a person is willing to make.  :P

Aaron Hall scores in the 70's

St Kilda beat GWS

Pendlebury goes 130+

[BomberSam]

I like this idea but from a managing point of view you might be better off taking 2 maybe 3 calls from each person, 5 or 8 will be a nightmareto keep track off if interest picks up. In addition the problem i can see with having so many calls per person is that most of them a likely to be wrong so we may well all end up with negative point scores lol anyway thanks for starting this thread and here goes.

P.S on second thought maybe easier to just mark points on how many ever calls a person is willing to make.  :P

Aaron Hall scores in the 70's

St Kilda beat GWS

Pendlebury goes 130+

G'day Grufflez, I think what fanTCfool is saying is we need 8 people to make up to 5 calls in order to get the game underway. Not worth the effort to keep a leaderboard when there are only 3 or 4 competitors.

[HappyDEZ]

Port win.
Boak wins the Peter Badcoe VC medal.
Goldy goes 150+ in SC.
Joe Daniher kicks 6+.
Freo win by 60+ points.

[fanTCfool]

I like this idea but from a managing point of view you might be better off taking 2 maybe 3 calls from each person, 5 or 8 will be a nightmareto keep track off if interest picks up. In addition the problem i can see with having so many calls per person is that most of them a likely to be wrong so we may well all end up with negative point scores lol anyway thanks for starting this thread and here goes.

P.S on second thought maybe easier to just mark points on how many ever calls a person is willing to make.  :P

Aaron Hall scores in the 70's

St Kilda beat GWS

Pendlebury goes 130+

G'day Grufflez, I think what fanTCfool is saying is we need 8 people to make up to 5 calls in order to get the game underway. Not worth the effort to keep a leaderboard when there are only 3 or 4 competitors.

You've got that spot on Sam.
Thank you to everyone who has made a submission  ;D

[fanTCfool]

I like this idea but from a managing point of view you might be better off taking 2 maybe 3 calls from each person, 5 or 8 will be a nightmareto keep track off if interest picks up. In addition the problem i can see with having so many calls per person is that most of them a likely to be wrong so we may well all end up with negative point scores lol anyway thanks for starting this thread and here goes.

P.S on second thought maybe easier to just mark points on how many ever calls a person is willing to make.  :P

Aaron Hall scores in the 70's

St Kilda beat GWS

Pendlebury goes 130+

Could you please clarify if you are talking in terms of SC or DT here Grufflez?