Rockliff to..?

[MC]

I'll be bringing in GAJ I think, extra captain option will offset the potential missed game or two later in the season

[sammy123]

i have gone for a POD in sam mitchell

Thought I had him to myself but see a few getting on now.

it was between him and rocky during pre season for m5. but couldn't pass on rocky's value

[quinny88]

i have gone for a POD in sam mitchell

Thought I had him to myself but see a few getting on now.

it was between him and rocky during pre season for m5. but couldn't pass on rocky's value

Hindsight is a wonderful thing hey :P

[quinny88]

Think I'm gonna go with Gray. Heard a stat on AFL 360 last night saying he's going at like 50% efficiency?  :o
If that's the case and he's still scoring like this then there is some massive upside in his game

[GCSkiwi]

I would def go with Gray, can't see Ward at 110-115, I've picked him up before hoping for that and he doesn't seem to deliver, and Parker is too inconsistent for my liking...

[RaisyDaisy]

I'm going with Gray

Very close on Smitch and Titch, but all this media talk about why teams keep letting Smitch run free has slightly put me off him

Plus, Gray is one of my favourite players in the game :)

[Danstar]

I'm in the same boat. I'm thinking Gray more so cos he is playing on Friday night this week and has VC loophole opportunity lol

[Jimmykidd]

be cautious though, port are missing wingard and schulz. gray could play a lot more fwd than mid.

but hes a gun regardless. one of my faves.

[Rusty00]

be cautious though, port are missing wingard and schulz. gray could play a lot more fwd than mid.

but hes a gun regardless. one of my faves.

Wingard and Schulz were missing last week as well and he played predominantly midfield. Hartlett is out and Boak is carrying an injury at the moment so Gray is needed in the middle.

[Ricochet]

be cautious though, port are missing wingard and schulz. gray could play a lot more fwd than mid.

That's what I'm worried about with Gray

[Danstar]

be cautious though, port are missing wingard and schulz. gray could play a lot more fwd than mid.

That's what I'm worried about with Gray

But hasn't he played quite a bit in the forward line already? And still scoring well...?

[AaronKirk]

He has played a fair bit in the forward line in the last couple of week and it hasn't affected his scores. I wish you all picked the other 2 options and not Gray so he can remain a bit of a POD.

Playing a lot up forward v Essendon shouldn't be too much of a problem for Gray this week.

[_wato]

TMitch

Averaged 112 unsubbed last year and he's started on fire

[Ricochet]

be cautious though, port are missing wingard and schulz. gray could play a lot more fwd than mid.

That's what I'm worried about with Gray

But hasn't he played quite a bit in the forward line already? And still scoring well...?

A little bit more but not exclusively as a forward, which i'm concerned may happen with Wingard and Schulz out.




I'm still considering, but there is a genuine chance he could sit inside 50 as a permanent forward

[_wato]

I agree Rico. Boak, S Gray, Wines, Ebert, Ah Chee and others can easily cover him while he plays deep forward