corrective trades

Started by sidvicious, March 26, 2016, 06:37:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

YoungGun

depending on this week's scores, I can see some good value doing milera to papley.

if papley scores well this week, all he has to do is play 2 games more after rnd 3 to be a really good early cash cow... plus you make 60k from the trade.

Both having shaky JS makes me more likely to pull the trigger rather than less if Milera scores poorly again.

Judd Magic

Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:57:38 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 29, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
No correctional trades for me

Just need my premos to score like premos

+1  >:(

No Hewett and Papley if they kill it again this week RD?  :-\

GCSkiwi

Quote from: Judd Magic on March 29, 2016, 09:22:40 AM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:57:38 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 29, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
No correctional trades for me

Just need my premos to score like premos

+1  >:(

No Hewett and Papley if they kill it again this week RD?  :-\

Depends who you have in your side I guess, and if they kill it again you have to look at them. BUT, let's remember that this is a team Tom Mitchell struggled to get a regular gig in, and that guy is a jet. If they kill round 2 and are named round 3 I'll look at them, but Sydney have a few to come back and I don't know if I'd want to be sweating on these guys

Judd Magic

Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 09:27:30 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 29, 2016, 09:22:40 AM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:57:38 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 29, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
No correctional trades for me

Just need my premos to score like premos

+1  >:(

No Hewett and Papley if they kill it again this week RD?  :-\

Depends who you have in your side I guess, and if they kill it again you have to look at them. BUT, let's remember that this is a team Tom Mitchell struggled to get a regular gig in, and that guy is a jet. If they kill round 2 and are named round 3 I'll look at them, but Sydney have a few to come back and I don't know if I'd want to be sweating on these guys

Well said mate.

I am treading with caution too.

I think Hewett is the better player of the two and would most likely hold his spot in the team more.

Wouldn't know who to get rid of for them.

My mid bench is Menadue, Gresham, Davis.

And my forward bench is McCarthy and Petracca.

Petracca will be in the Dees side the next 2-3 weeks I reckon. GUN!!!!!

GCSkiwi

I have the same mid bench and if they both have similar performance round 2 then Gresham to Hewett would be touch to ignore, but I have faith in Gresham, he just wasn't really involved this week, like his JS much more than Hewett, though these calls sometimes define your season very early haha

Grufflez

The swans rookies are being overrated, Collingwood's performance was absolutely dreadful. 3 goals & 11 touches for Papley and 15 touches for Hewett although i think he tackled well.

Don't jump the gun.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Judd Magic on March 29, 2016, 09:22:40 AM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:57:38 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 29, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
No correctional trades for me

Just need my premos to score like premos

+1  >:(

No Hewett and Papley if they kill it again this week RD?  :-\

I don't consider switching rookies as "correctional trades". I think correctionals are more so do with premo's and structure

As per the comments above let's see how those two go this week. Milera to Papley might just be a must purely from a cash generation point of view, but I don't mind not having Hewett as long as Dunkley and Gresh hold their spots

Judd Magic

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 29, 2016, 09:59:41 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 29, 2016, 09:22:40 AM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:57:38 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 29, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
No correctional trades for me

Just need my premos to score like premos

+1  >:(

No Hewett and Papley if they kill it again this week RD?  :-\

I don't consider switching rookies as "correctional trades". I think correctionals are more so do with premo's and structure

As per the comments above let's see how those two go this week. Milera to Papley might just be a must purely from a cash generation point of view, but I don't mind not having Hewett as long as Dunkley and Gresh hold their spots

I'd like to get Lonergan into my backline for Dea or Brown to be honest.

Ringo

Gee some people like ignoring the golden rule do not trade premiums based on 1 game.

Most traded out players in my team
1 Nat Fyfe FRE | MID $670,600    1523 (5.02%)
2 Michael Barlow FRE | MID - FWD $505,300    1041 (3.43%)
3 Scott Pendlebury COL | MID $627,200 630 (2.08%)
4 Wayne Milera ADE | FWD $175,800    456 (1.50%)
5 Mitch Robinson BRL | FWD - MID $ 499,800    281 (0.93%)

Most trade in players not in my team

1 Tom Papley SYD | FWD $109,900    3092 (10.20%)
2 Tom Hickey STK | FWD - RUC $375,300    2056 (6.78%)
3  Luke Parker SYD | MID $538,200    1585 (5.23%)
4 Jason Johannisen WBD | DEF $418,200    1267 (4.18%)
5 Patrick Dangerfield GEE | MID $647,000    1071 (3.53%)

Can understand trading in if you had Swan or Hodge but some of these are ridiculous bearing in mind we only have 30 trades for the year.

I am allowing myself if required 2 corrective trades in Rd 3 or 4.

fanTCfool

Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 10:29:42 AM
Gee some people like ignoring the golden rule do not trade premiums based on 1 game.

Most traded out players in my team
1 Nat Fyfe FRE | MID $670,600    1523 (5.02%)
2 Michael Barlow FRE | MID - FWD $505,300    1041 (3.43%)
3 Scott Pendlebury COL | MID $627,200 630 (2.08%)
4 Wayne Milera ADE | FWD $175,800    456 (1.50%)
5 Mitch Robinson BRL | FWD - MID $ 499,800    281 (0.93%)

Most trade in players not in my team

1 Tom Papley SYD | FWD $109,900    3092 (10.20%)
2 Tom Hickey STK | FWD - RUC $375,300    2056 (6.78%)
3  Luke Parker SYD | MID $538,200    1585 (5.23%)
4 Jason Johannisen WBD | DEF $418,200    1267 (4.18%)
5 Patrick Dangerfield GEE | MID $647,000    1071 (3.53%)

Can understand trading in if you had Swan or Hodge but some of these are ridiculous bearing in mind we only have 30 trades for the year.

I am allowing myself if required 2 corrective trades in Rd 3 or 4.

900 more people jumping on Hickey since I saw these figures last night  :o
30,000 trades in about 12 hours since it all opened up... insanity!

Fid

Quote from: fanTCfool on March 29, 2016, 10:34:52 AM
Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 10:29:42 AM
Gee some people like ignoring the golden rule do not trade premiums based on 1 game.

Most traded out players in my team
1 Nat Fyfe FRE | MID $670,600    1523 (5.02%)
2 Michael Barlow FRE | MID - FWD $505,300    1041 (3.43%)
3 Scott Pendlebury COL | MID $627,200 630 (2.08%)
4 Wayne Milera ADE | FWD $175,800    456 (1.50%)
5 Mitch Robinson BRL | FWD - MID $ 499,800    281 (0.93%)

Most trade in players not in my team

1 Tom Papley SYD | FWD $109,900    3092 (10.20%)
2 Tom Hickey STK | FWD - RUC $375,300    2056 (6.78%)
3  Luke Parker SYD | MID $538,200    1585 (5.23%)
4 Jason Johannisen WBD | DEF $418,200    1267 (4.18%)
5 Patrick Dangerfield GEE | MID $647,000    1071 (3.53%)

Can understand trading in if you had Swan or Hodge but some of these are ridiculous bearing in mind we only have 30 trades for the year.

I am allowing myself if required 2 corrective trades in Rd 3 or 4.

900 more people jumping on Hickey since I saw these figures last night  :o
30,000 trades in about 12 hours since it all opened up... insanity!

One would think that a lot of those are just experimenting and will reverse their trades

Holz

have to admit Seeds to Mckenzie is almost on the cards.

Seeds has one more week.

the 80k I can pocket will be mighty helpfull.

GCSkiwi

Quote from: Holz on March 29, 2016, 11:10:37 AM
have to admit Seeds to Mckenzie is almost on the cards.

Seeds has one more week.

the 80k I can pocket will be mighty helpfull.

Really Holz? McKenzie had a big second half, was on 35 at HT, and bumped up 5 points by scaling. I know Seeds was disappointing but still, don't think McKenzie will be a spectacular replacement for the cost of a trade +80k...

sammy123

Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 10:29:42 AM
Gee some people like ignoring the golden rule do not trade premiums based on 1 game.

Most traded out players in my team
1 Nat Fyfe FRE | MID $670,600    1523 (5.02%)
2 Michael Barlow FRE | MID - FWD $505,300    1041 (3.43%)
3 Scott Pendlebury COL | MID $627,200 630 (2.08%)
4 Wayne Milera ADE | FWD $175,800    456 (1.50%)
5 Mitch Robinson BRL | FWD - MID $ 499,800    281 (0.93%)

Most trade in players not in my team

1 Tom Papley SYD | FWD $109,900    3092 (10.20%)
2 Tom Hickey STK | FWD - RUC $375,300    2056 (6.78%)
3  Luke Parker SYD | MID $538,200    1585 (5.23%)
4 Jason Johannisen WBD | DEF $418,200    1267 (4.18%)
5 Patrick Dangerfield GEE | MID $647,000    1071 (3.53%)

Can understand trading in if you had Swan or Hodge but some of these are ridiculous bearing in mind we only have 30 trades for the year.

I am allowing myself if required 2 corrective trades in Rd 3 or 4.

wow people make me laugh

Torpedo10

Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 11:25:37 AM
Quote from: Holz on March 29, 2016, 11:10:37 AM
have to admit Seeds to Mckenzie is almost on the cards.

Seeds has one more week.

the 80k I can pocket will be mighty helpfull.

Really Holz? McKenzie had a big second half, was on 35 at HT, and bumped up 5 points by scaling. I know Seeds was disappointing but still, don't think McKenzie will be a spectacular replacement for the cost of a trade +80k...
Consider this GC:

Seeds has another 60 odd game and Mac goes 90+ again. the trade, which has a net worth of roundabout 140k will gain you 80k, along with the price increase from Mac and decrease from Seeds. if this also returns a better average, I'd say the trade is well worth it.

Don't have any midpricers right now as I took on BSmith, but if I did I'd be strongly considering a downgrade to Mac if they were underperforming.