Grimley what to do with?

[whynot102]

Hold and hope ir trade to Mitch McGovern havd Cox at R3 but wanted a back up thinking just to risk it

[enzedder]

Hold and hope ir trade to Mitch McGovern havd Cox at R3 but wanted a back up thinking just to risk it

Traded out. Put Menadue F7 but still got link to mids atm. Cheap non player R3 looks the way to go.

[blackrose]

Hold and hope ir trade to Mitch McGovern havd Cox at R3 but wanted a back up thinking just to risk it

Traded out. Put Menadue F7 but still got link to mids atm. Cheap non player R3 looks the way to go.

Don't think main cox will get a game this year?

[mzunguman]

He'll get a game eventually. No better cheap options ImO

[cortez]

keeping him with leuey in fwds

[eaglesman]

Gone!

[Blues Blues Blues]

Gone!

But who do u bring in? :-\

[RaisyDaisy]

This is pretty much the last decision I have to make

He is sitting at R3, so what do I do with him? Might just drop to Goetz so I can loophole, and hope that Goldy and NN get through the year without missing, and if they do I guess I could always turn a forward rookie into Luey if things got that desperate  :-\

We can just hold Grimley at R3 too because he could get a game next week. Just means I won't be able to loophole Captain

Hmmmmm

[jfitty]

I think I might stick with Grimley.

I've gone through and had a look at which team plays the most Sunday games.. Including a few Monday games.

St Kilda and Carlton have 10 each.. Then Essendon, Melbourne and West Coast all have 9.

Grimley could be worth a pick, as he will either be playing and generating cash, or used for loophole.

If you're considering starting Leuenberger (:-X) he also makes sense as a backup.

[Cambo]

Any thoughts on putting Currie at R3?  More expensive but should play regulary and will get more points than the other cheapies...

[RaisyDaisy]

Any thoughts on putting Currie at R3?  More expensive but should play regulary and will get more points than the other cheapies...

Why would he play regularly?

I reckon Grimley has a better chance of playing than Currie

[dmac07]

Any thoughts on putting Currie at R3?  More expensive but should play regulary and will get more points than the other cheapies...

Why would he play regularly?

I reckon Grimley has a better chance of playing than Currie

This, people have said Currie will get games at his last two clubs.

Im sticking with Grumley, no one else more likely to play games and can loophole him when he doesnt.

[Mat0369]

Why would he play regularly?

I reckon Grimley has a better chance of playing than Currie

Grimley will only play as a forward, looking at the 22 the Dons have selected they think that McKernan/Daniher will be the two keys with Langford pinch hitting as a third tall. If Leuenberger gets injured then it gets interesting. They can either bring in Grimley to play the 2nd tall with McKernan moving into the ruck role or they could keep the same structure and bring in one of Jamar/Michael.

It is highly likely that a Leuenberger injury does occur, but it is also very likely that Nicholls gets injured. Currie has a higher ceiling for scoring points over Grimley so I would be leaning that way as well.

Is it also possible that Leuenberger didn't travel at all and one of Michael/Grimley comes in anyway looking at the fact they have 2 ruck emergencies?