Supercoach Scoring System

[RaisyDaisy]

Goal: 8 points

Behind: 1 point

Score Assist: 3.5 points

Intercept contested mark: 8 points

Contested mark: 6 points

Contested possession at ground level: 4.5 points

Intercept possession: 4.5 points

Mark on a lead: 5 points

Uncontested mark: 2 points

Handball received: 1.5 points

Gather: 1.5 points

Hitout to advantage: 5 points

Hitout: 0 points

Hitout sharked: -1 point

Free kick: 4 points

Free against: -4 points

50m penalty against: -8.5 points

Effective kick: 4 points

Effective handball: 1.5 points

Ineffective disposal: 0 points

Clanger disposal: -4 points

Tackle: 4 points

Spoil: 2 points

Shepherd: 1.5 points

[fanTCfool]

Never knew the 'mark on a lead'

[quinny88]

Has there always been half points? Someone can potentially score say 50.5?

[Gigantor]

Lol was just reading this article!

-8.5 for a 50 is brutal  :o

[GoLions]

Has there always been half points? Someone can potentially score say 50.5?

Yeah always had half points for as long as I can remember

[fanTCfool]

Has there always been half points? Someone can potentially score say 50.5?

Pretty sure the half points have been around for a while, but when the scores are scaled any half points are rounded either way.

[quinny88]

Has there always been half points? Someone can potentially score say 50.5?

Pretty sure the half points have been around for a while, but when the scores are scaled any half points are rounded either way.

Ah I see! Have never actually had a good look at the scoring system haha

[meow meow]

It's wrong. I know most of the real scores and that guide is way off.

[LordSneeze]

It's wrong. I know most of the real scores and that guide is way off.

Wll it is only giving 25 of the poosible 100 scoring option and all of them were already known.
for example a Long Effective kick is worth more than a Short Effective kick. Which then changes in price depending on if you go forward, backwards, sideways, rebound 50, inside 50, time, score, pressure. Any guide that is given is really useless unless they provide ALL measurements.

[Ricochet]

It's wrong. I know most of the real scores and that guide is way off.

Is mark on the lead new mate? Or always been around

[RaisyDaisy]

It's wrong. I know most of the real scores and that guide is way off.

Well this is what CD has published

Funny that they don't mention anything about weighting, higher scoring for players who impacted when the game was still in the balance, match winning goals etc

[meow meow]

It's wrong. I know most of the real scores and that guide is way off.

Is mark on the lead new mate? Or always been around

Always been around (NRoo at his peak being a prime example) but they pick and choose when to decide what's a lead and what isn't. It was included in the real list that I published last year. It's worth 3 points vs 1 for a regular uncontested mark from teammate.

It's wrong. I know most of the real scores and that guide is way off.

Wll it is only giving 25 of the poosible 100 scoring option and all of them were already known.
for example a Long Effective kick is worth more than a Short Effective kick. Which then changes in price depending on if you go forward, backwards, sideways, rebound 50, inside 50, time, score, pressure. Any guide that is given is really useless unless they provide ALL measurements.

Actually, effective long and short kicks are each worth 3 points. Long kick (40m+) to advantage is worth 5. Backwards kick is worth 1. There's no premium put on inside/rebound 50's either.

@RD yeah its much the same as what they have had on the SC site but that's always been wrong too. Tackles have always been listed as being worth 4 but they're only 4 if it's a defender in their own defensive 50 or a forward in their own attacking 50. Every other time they're worth 3. Same with HOTA being 4 usually.

Scaling is a little more complicated but not rocket science either. Players from both teams get scaled the same though. The notion that players get scaled up purely because their team wins is an absolute myth.