Round 1 Thread

Started by Jukes, March 18, 2016, 04:47:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

powersuperkents

#30
According to the fixture, I was playing Anaheim (Anaheim at home, Santiago away)

Colorado was playing Boston (Colorado at home, Boston away)

Jukes

Quote from: powersuperkents on March 28, 2016, 08:57:55 PM
According to the fixture, I was playing Anaheim (Anaheim at home, Santiago away)

Colorado was playing Boston (Colorado at home, Boston away)

Woops, I have no flowering clue how I made that mistake

powersuperkents

Quote from: Jukes on March 28, 2016, 09:12:08 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on March 28, 2016, 08:57:55 PM
According to the fixture, I was playing Anaheim (Anaheim at home, Santiago away)

Colorado was playing Boston (Colorado at home, Boston away)

Woops, I have no flowering clue how I made that mistake
All good  :)

You were busy today so I understand if you're tired (after a 6-12 hour shift I cannot think straight - it sucks if I'm working the cash register hahahaha)

Nige

Hey guys, will get the results up soon, sorry for the wait.

Nige

Colorado Avalanche 18.12.120 lost to Boston Terriers 19.11.125
(Real: 1800 vs 1869)

The Boston juggernaut took the away win with a pretty shared effort across the board with only star forward Nick Riewoldt having a quiet one. Their lack of sub meant Nick wasn't replaced, but a poor game from Colorado skipper Luke Hodge coupled with very few of his teammates putting in best-worthy performances meant they felt short of Round 1 victory.

Best
Colorado: Ebert, Hickey, Hall
Boston: Murphy, Rich, Priddis, Neale, Gray, Goldstein, Smith

Chicago Sharks 20.7.127 defeated San Francisco Grizzlies 15.17.107
(Real: 1907 vs 1601)

Chicago kicked off their season with a strong win over the flailing San Fran Grizzlies who just didn't put up much of a fight. An injury to Jed Anderson meant Tom Hawkins was subbed on but he couldn't get into the game, meanwhile their skipper Heath Shaw had an usually quiet day. For Chicago, there were few passengers and a consistent effort by all involved meant they walked away with the honours.

Best
Chicago: McDonald, Selwood, Gaff, Parker, Rischitelli, Stringer
San Francisco: Steven, Jack, Viney

New Brooklyn Hawks 16.15.111 defeated Carolina Panthers 16.13.109
(Real: 1668 vs 1638)

Despite captain Callan Ward leading from the front, the Carolina outfit just couldn't overcome the New Brooklyn boys in what was a tight tussle. Both teams had mixed performances which reflected in the scoreline and neither side was able to really get on top of the other. A few outstanding efforts were needed from both sides to carry those that struggled, and in the end, the Hawks came away with the win.

Best
New Brooklyn: Liberatore, Cripps, Gunston, Blicavs
Carolina: Docherty, Ward, Shiel, Bontempelli

Jukes

Will do the ladder tomorrow (at a stretch later tonight)

And #premiershiphangover

elephants


Nige

Quote from: elephants on March 29, 2016, 03:15:07 PM
Who even needs a sub!
When I chucked the teams into the spreadsheet, I was like "I hope not naming a sub doesn't cost ele the win here."

Jukes

Ladder
Ottawa Otters   1   0   126   106   118.87
Chicago Sharks   1   0   127   107   118.69
Santiago Cockerels   1   0   126   119   105.88
Quito Quetzals   1   0   114   108   105.56
Boston Terriers   1   0   125   120   104.17
New Brooklyn Hawks   1   0   111   109   101.83
----------------------------------------------------------
Carolina Panthers   0   1   109   111   98.20
Colorado Avalanche   0   1   120   125   96.00
Houston Bombers   0   1   108   114   94.74
Anaheim Mighty Ducks    0   1   119   126   94.44
San Francisco Grizzlies   0   1   107   127   84.25
Las Vegas Sinners   0   1   106   126   84.13

Nige


T Dog


popedelio

Quote from: Nige on March 29, 2016, 03:20:23 PM
Quote from: elephants on March 29, 2016, 03:15:07 PM
Who even needs a sub!
When I chucked the teams into the spreadsheet, I was like "I hope not naming a sub doesn't cost ele the win here."
I didn't have a sub also :'( Unfortunately with the lockout on Thursday and I finish at 5pm (WST) I couldn't rename my sub

Nige

Quote from: T Dog on March 29, 2016, 08:42:45 PM
Quote from: Nige on March 29, 2016, 06:12:50 PM
Aw yeah!  8)

which one is you Nige?   ::)
Fortunate enough to be the one on top of the ladder.  ;D

Jukes

Quote from: popedelio on March 29, 2016, 10:12:54 PM
Quote from: Nige on March 29, 2016, 03:20:23 PM
Quote from: elephants on March 29, 2016, 03:15:07 PM
Who even needs a sub!
When I chucked the teams into the spreadsheet, I was like "I hope not naming a sub doesn't cost ele the win here."
I didn't have a sub also :'( Unfortunately with the lockout on Thursday and I finish at 5pm (WST) I couldn't rename my sub

I had it worse guys

Tom Hawkins was my sub

powersuperkents

Quote from: Jukes on March 30, 2016, 01:23:35 AM
Quote from: popedelio on March 29, 2016, 10:12:54 PM
Quote from: Nige on March 29, 2016, 03:20:23 PM
Quote from: elephants on March 29, 2016, 03:15:07 PM
Who even needs a sub!
When I chucked the teams into the spreadsheet, I was like "I hope not naming a sub doesn't cost ele the win here."
I didn't have a sub also :'( Unfortunately with the lockout on Thursday and I finish at 5pm (WST) I couldn't rename my sub

I had it worse guys

Tom Hawkins was my sub
My sub was Luke Dunstan - so his score was also useless

This is probably the round with the most unnamed/inactivated subs since the rule was enacted