Brad Crouch vs. Matt Crouch

Started by abc11, March 15, 2016, 11:52:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 05:08:33 PM
Quote from: baz1 on March 15, 2016, 05:00:50 PM
Matt Crouch's averages from last season minus his many sub games would surely have him priced well over 450k? Danger gone, and sub vest non-existant? I don't understand why people aren't all over him. Anyone able to shed any light for me?

Prob cos Brad is cheaper, has a higher ceiling and ppl don't want an extra mid pricer when they already have Libba and Brad.

this and there are blokes like Degoey in the forward line for 320k who i think can go simialr.

I actually may drop libba but crouch at 300k you cant pass.

Remember Brad crouch didnt play last year the kids a major ball winner, he will negate much of danger going. Smith Seedsman also coming in to the squad.

would say there is less ball available then last year.

jvalles69

Quote from: Holz on March 15, 2016, 05:13:57 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 05:08:33 PM
Quote from: baz1 on March 15, 2016, 05:00:50 PM
Matt Crouch's averages from last season minus his many sub games would surely have him priced well over 450k? Danger gone, and sub vest non-existant? I don't understand why people aren't all over him. Anyone able to shed any light for me?

Prob cos Brad is cheaper, has a higher ceiling and ppl don't want an extra mid pricer when they already have Libba and Brad.

this and there are blokes like Degoey in the forward line for 320k who i think can go simialr.

I actually may drop libba but crouch at 300k you cant pass.

Remember Brad crouch didnt play last year the kids a major ball winner, he will negate much of danger going. Smith Seedsman also coming in to the squad.

would say there is less ball available then last year.

I'm considering dropping Libba too, but if I did I'd prob be rolling with both Crouch bro's, I think Matt will sustain a high 90's average.

RaisyDaisy

Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Sabretooth Tigers

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 05:08:33 PM
Quote from: baz1 on March 15, 2016, 05:00:50 PM
Matt Crouch's averages from last season minus his many sub games would surely have him priced well over 450k? Danger gone, and sub vest non-existant? I don't understand why people aren't all over him. Anyone able to shed any light for me?

Prob cos Brad is cheaper, has a higher ceiling and ppl don't want an extra mid pricer when they already have Libba and Brad.

This, plus how will the two Crouches, Sloane etc go score wise when they are all playing together.   

Peter

Same way Pies and Bulldogs run multiple mids together for big points, last year

jvalles69

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 15, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Prob won't do it, but Dogs are playing a fairly different type of game plan since Libba last played...so wouldn't be surprised if he drops off from the 110+ scores he used to post.  Still a solid 100 so can't fault that.

Capper

Quote from: Capper on March 15, 2016, 02:51:48 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 15, 2016, 02:28:11 PM
Quote from: Capper on March 15, 2016, 02:06:11 PM
not picking either of them at this stage. There are cheaper options that can score similar.
Brad will average 90 minimum but most likely more, what cheaper option is there that can do what Brad can?
Mills, Gresham, Wells, Kerridge can all average around the 90mark and are 100-200K cheaper.

If MAtt and Brad averages 90 Matt will make you $70k and Brad $130k by the bye

Mills will make $210k, Wells $200k, Gres and Kerr about $280k

If you start a mid pricer then you might have to hold them for the year and hope they break out.

The only mid pricer in my mids atm is Liba as he can go 110+
they are rookies that will make your team money. No way will they in your team for the year. Hence why i only mentioned up to the bye period  ::)

IntegralX

Brad>Matt

Honestly it's the cash. That 60k could go a long way. Neither have a shot of averaging 100 so go with the one that is likely to make more$$$; matt almost has to be a keeper at that price.

colmullet

Quote from: IntegralX on March 15, 2016, 06:46:23 PM
Brad>Matt

Honestly it's the cash. That 60k could go a long way. Neither have a shot of averaging 100 so go with the one that is likely to make more$$$; matt almost has to be a keeper at that price.

Think they have a pretty dam good shot at cracking 100 for the year

Marstar

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 06:15:35 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 15, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Prob won't do it, but Dogs are playing a fairly different type of game plan since Libba last played...so wouldn't be surprised if he drops off from the 110+ scores he used to post.  Still a solid 100 so can't fault that.

No1 here is expecting Libba to get back to 110+ off the bat ... we didn't expect that of Barlow :P

Not aimed at the quote:

Libba is miles ahead of B.Crouch atm ... I know a lot more of what to expect from Lib. If he puts in a 10 tackle game he's tonneing up and if he's putting in a 4 tackle game he's not :P

If you think Libba will struggle cause you actually got to see him play a poor NAB game ... then why the baseless confidence in B.Crouch doing any better ?

jvalles69

Quote from: Marstar on March 15, 2016, 07:45:36 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 06:15:35 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 15, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Prob won't do it, but Dogs are playing a fairly different type of game plan since Libba last played...so wouldn't be surprised if he drops off from the 110+ scores he used to post.  Still a solid 100 so can't fault that.

No1 here is expecting Libba to get back to 110+ off the bat ... we didn't expect that of Barlow :P

Not aimed at the quote:

Libba is miles ahead of B.Crouch atm ... I know a lot more of what to expect from Lib. If he puts in a 10 tackle game he's tonneing up and if he's putting in a 4 tackle game he's not :P

If you think Libba will struggle cause you actually got to see him play a poor NAB game ... then why the baseless confidence in B.Crouch doing any better ?

Not baseless as I was referring to Matt Crouch...I've considered Matt over Libba or Brad at points...for the record I prob will stick with Libba and Brad.  If you read my earlier post I gave reasons for picking Brad and Libba over Matt.

Marstar

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 07:50:56 PM
Quote from: Marstar on March 15, 2016, 07:45:36 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 06:15:35 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 15, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Prob won't do it, but Dogs are playing a fairly different type of game plan since Libba last played...so wouldn't be surprised if he drops off from the 110+ scores he used to post.  Still a solid 100 so can't fault that.

No1 here is expecting Libba to get back to 110+ off the bat ... we didn't expect that of Barlow :P

Not aimed at the quote:

Libba is miles ahead of B.Crouch atm ... I know a lot more of what to expect from Lib. If he puts in a 10 tackle game he's tonneing up and if he's putting in a 4 tackle game he's not :P

If you think Libba will struggle cause you actually got to see him play a poor NAB game ... then why the baseless confidence in B.Crouch doing any better ?

Not baseless as I was referring to Matt Crouch...I've considered Matt over Libba or Brad at points...for the record I prob will stick with Libba and Brad.  If you read my earlier post I gave reasons for picking Brad and Libba over Matt.

As stated the rest of my post wasn't aimed at your quote, but just continuing the BC vs TL discussion in general.

I'd take M.Couch of B.Couch too at this stage.

jvalles69

Quote from: Marstar on March 15, 2016, 08:02:34 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 07:50:56 PM
Quote from: Marstar on March 15, 2016, 07:45:36 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 06:15:35 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 15, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Prob won't do it, but Dogs are playing a fairly different type of game plan since Libba last played...so wouldn't be surprised if he drops off from the 110+ scores he used to post.  Still a solid 100 so can't fault that.

No1 here is expecting Libba to get back to 110+ off the bat ... we didn't expect that of Barlow :P

Not aimed at the quote:

Libba is miles ahead of B.Crouch atm ... I know a lot more of what to expect from Lib. If he puts in a 10 tackle game he's tonneing up and if he's putting in a 4 tackle game he's not :P

If you think Libba will struggle cause you actually got to see him play a poor NAB game ... then why the baseless confidence in B.Crouch doing any better ?

Not baseless as I was referring to Matt Crouch...I've considered Matt over Libba or Brad at points...for the record I prob will stick with Libba and Brad.  If you read my earlier post I gave reasons for picking Brad and Libba over Matt.

As stated the rest of my post wasn't aimed at your quote, but just continuing the BC vs TL discussion in general.

I'd take M.Couch of B.Couch too at this stage.

It would be nicer if we had an extra 200K to take on a premo and forget the whole crouch dilemma, haha!

Blues Blues Blues

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 08:10:31 PM
Quote from: Marstar on March 15, 2016, 08:02:34 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 07:50:56 PM
Quote from: Marstar on March 15, 2016, 07:45:36 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 15, 2016, 06:15:35 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 15, 2016, 05:53:54 PM
Dropping Libba?

Pffft, stop letting his last NAB game influence you

Prob won't do it, but Dogs are playing a fairly different type of game plan since Libba last played...so wouldn't be surprised if he drops off from the 110+ scores he used to post.  Still a solid 100 so can't fault that.

No1 here is expecting Libba to get back to 110+ off the bat ... we didn't expect that of Barlow :P

Not aimed at the quote:

Libba is miles ahead of B.Crouch atm ... I know a lot more of what to expect from Lib. If he puts in a 10 tackle game he's tonneing up and if he's putting in a 4 tackle game he's not :P

If you think Libba will struggle cause you actually got to see him play a poor NAB game ... then why the baseless confidence in B.Crouch doing any better ?

Not baseless as I was referring to Matt Crouch...I've considered Matt over Libba or Brad at points...for the record I prob will stick with Libba and Brad.  If you read my earlier post I gave reasons for picking Brad and Libba over Matt.

As stated the rest of my post wasn't aimed at your quote, but just continuing the BC vs TL discussion in general.

I'd take M.Couch of B.Couch too at this stage.

It would be nicer if we had an extra 200K to take on a premo and forget the whole crouch dilemma, haha!

I'd probably still grab the Libba and Crouch combo and use the $200k elsewhere - I love the idea of a bargain and hate the thought of missing out on something!

crowls

hope plenty drop libba.    agree questions exist over fitting in under bevo plan.    but libba has always gone and got the ball and tackled everything that moves.     this will not change.    worst case  90-100  best case 105-110.   great m8