Post-NAB team line-up (critiques and criticisms???)

[NerevousNeurons]

Still have $66K spare

Upgrade options?
PODs?

[lucky]

Still have $66K spare

Upgrade options?
PODs?

Way too many risks for my liking, I understand that PODs are good but you cannot expect all of your mid priced picks to hit. and by the time you work out which are bad mid priced picks you are in the awakward range  where you have to find a rookie atleast or be forced to double trade. i like having 1-3 mid pricers maximum(excluding libba) but having 6 or 7 is way way too many.

[corzer03]

Very ballsy but could pay off in my opinion, i like it

[fanTCfool]

Big fan of Ross, but there's no need for him in your side, you can be fielding Menadue/Kennedy instead and just select another rookie in Ross' place. With the spare change, I would look to upgrade Harwood or bring in Goldy

[jvalles69]

Def:  Fairly solid line, ppl are going to take very different paths in defense, but none are wrong.  Lot of money into those D4 & D5, but it's something we may all have to do.

Mids: Priddis POD is nice, pay for what you get, no less, no more.  I'd be upgrading Crouch and Ross.

Rucks: No goldy? If these are your 2 rucks now, just remember they'll prob be your 2 rucks at R23.

For: Feel like you should only have 1-2 of Gray, Greene, De Goey.

I would put Bennedy and Kerridge in your fwd line and take out your F4 and F5 and use the cash to upgrade Crouch and Ross to premo keepers, replacing some cheaper bench rookies in your mid line.

[NerevousNeurons]

Thanks for the feedback  8)

Revised line-up!!!!

[lucky]

Although your new team is more cookie cutter it feels much better. still love the risk in defence, priddis and hanners I reckon would be good uniques.

[jvalles69]

Although your new team is more cookie cutter it feels much better. still love the risk in defence, priddis and hanners I reckon would be good uniques.

Yeah, less question marks over the team now, good job.